diff mbox series

[v3,4/6] kselftest/alsa: Fix validation of writes to volatile controls

Message ID 20240616073454.16512-5-tiwai@suse.de (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series ALSA: some driver fixes for control input validations | expand

Commit Message

Takashi Iwai June 16, 2024, 7:34 a.m. UTC 
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

When validating writes to controls we check that whatever value we wrote
actually appears in the control.  For volatile controls we cannot assume
that this will be the case, the value may be changed at any time
including between our write and read.  Handle this by moving the check
for volatile controls that we currently do for events to a separate
block and just verifying that whatever value we read is valid for the
control.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240614-alsa-selftest-volatile-v1-1-3874f02964b1@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c | 45 +++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c
index 1c04e5f638a0..dd74f8cc7ece 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c
@@ -625,6 +625,21 @@  static int write_and_verify(struct ctl_data *ctl,
 		return err;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * We can't verify any specific value for volatile controls
+	 * but we should still check that whatever we read is a valid
+	 * vale for the control.
+	 */
+	if (snd_ctl_elem_info_is_volatile(ctl->info)) {
+		if (!ctl_value_valid(ctl, read_val)) {
+			ksft_print_msg("Volatile control %s has invalid value\n",
+				       ctl->name);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Check for an event if the value changed, or confirm that
 	 * there was none if it didn't.  We rely on the kernel
@@ -632,22 +647,20 @@  static int write_and_verify(struct ctl_data *ctl,
 	 * write, this is currently true, should that ever change this
 	 * will most likely break and need updating.
 	 */
-	if (!snd_ctl_elem_info_is_volatile(ctl->info)) {
-		err = wait_for_event(ctl, 0);
-		if (snd_ctl_elem_value_compare(initial_val, read_val)) {
-			if (err < 1) {
-				ksft_print_msg("No event generated for %s\n",
-					       ctl->name);
-				show_values(ctl, initial_val, read_val);
-				ctl->event_missing++;
-			}
-		} else {
-			if (err != 0) {
-				ksft_print_msg("Spurious event generated for %s\n",
-					       ctl->name);
-				show_values(ctl, initial_val, read_val);
-				ctl->event_spurious++;
-			}
+	err = wait_for_event(ctl, 0);
+	if (snd_ctl_elem_value_compare(initial_val, read_val)) {
+		if (err < 1) {
+			ksft_print_msg("No event generated for %s\n",
+				       ctl->name);
+			show_values(ctl, initial_val, read_val);
+			ctl->event_missing++;
+		}
+	} else {
+		if (err != 0) {
+			ksft_print_msg("Spurious event generated for %s\n",
+				       ctl->name);
+			show_values(ctl, initial_val, read_val);
+			ctl->event_spurious++;
 		}
 	}