| Message ID | 20240619142432.573338-1-Igor.A.Artemiev@mcst.ru (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [lvc-project] ASoC: simple-card-utils: Fix error handling in simple_util_init_jack() | expand |
Hi Igor, On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:24:32 +0300 Igor Artemiev <Igor.A.Artemiev@mcst.ru> wrote: > Currently, if snd_soc_card_jack_new_pins() or snd_soc_jack_add_gpios() > fails, the function continues execution without handling the error. > This can lead to unexpected behavior and potential crashes. > > This patch fixes the problem by checking the return value > of these functions. > > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. > > Signed-off-by: Igor Artemiev <Igor.A.Artemiev@mcst.ru> > --- > sound/soc/generic/simple-card-utils.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/generic/simple-card-utils.c b/sound/soc/generic/simple-card-utils.c > index 81077d16d22f..5da0c13858ad 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/generic/simple-card-utils.c > +++ b/sound/soc/generic/simple-card-utils.c > @@ -784,10 +784,14 @@ int simple_util_init_jack(struct snd_soc_card *card, > sjack->gpio.desc = desc; > sjack->gpio.debounce_time = 150; > > - snd_soc_card_jack_new_pins(card, pin_name, mask, &sjack->jack, > + error = snd_soc_card_jack_new_pins(card, pin_name, mask, &sjack->jack, > &sjack->pin, 1); > + if (error) > + return error; > > - snd_soc_jack_add_gpios(&sjack->jack, 1, &sjack->gpio); > + error = snd_soc_jack_add_gpios(&sjack->jack, 1, &sjack->gpio); > + if (error) > + return error; > } > > return 0; Looks correct for me. Reviewed-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com> Best regards, Hervé
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 05:24:32PM +0300, Igor Artemiev wrote: > Currently, if snd_soc_card_jack_new_pins() or snd_soc_jack_add_gpios() > fails, the function continues execution without handling the error. > This can lead to unexpected behavior and potential crashes. This just looks like some static checker thing, I'm just seeing a bald assertation about issues and crashes with no analysis about what those might be. TBH I'd expect this to make things worse not better.
diff --git a/sound/soc/generic/simple-card-utils.c b/sound/soc/generic/simple-card-utils.c index 81077d16d22f..5da0c13858ad 100644 --- a/sound/soc/generic/simple-card-utils.c +++ b/sound/soc/generic/simple-card-utils.c @@ -784,10 +784,14 @@ int simple_util_init_jack(struct snd_soc_card *card, sjack->gpio.desc = desc; sjack->gpio.debounce_time = 150; - snd_soc_card_jack_new_pins(card, pin_name, mask, &sjack->jack, + error = snd_soc_card_jack_new_pins(card, pin_name, mask, &sjack->jack, &sjack->pin, 1); + if (error) + return error; - snd_soc_jack_add_gpios(&sjack->jack, 1, &sjack->gpio); + error = snd_soc_jack_add_gpios(&sjack->jack, 1, &sjack->gpio); + if (error) + return error; } return 0;
Currently, if snd_soc_card_jack_new_pins() or snd_soc_jack_add_gpios() fails, the function continues execution without handling the error. This can lead to unexpected behavior and potential crashes. This patch fixes the problem by checking the return value of these functions. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. Signed-off-by: Igor Artemiev <Igor.A.Artemiev@mcst.ru> --- sound/soc/generic/simple-card-utils.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)