diff mbox series

[2/3] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Use correct queue_id for requesting input pin format

Message ID 20240624121519.91703-3-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit fe836c78ef1ff16da32912c22348091a0d67bda1
Headers show
Series ASoC: SOF: topology/intel improvements | expand

Commit Message

Pierre-Louis Bossart June 24, 2024, 12:15 p.m. UTC
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>

It is incorrect to request the input pin format of the destination widget
using the output pin index of the source module as the indexes are not
necessarily matching.
moduleA.out_pin1 can be connected to moduleB.in_pin0 for example.

Use the dst_queue_id to request the input format of the destination module.

This bug remained unnoticed likely because in nocodec topologies we don't
have process modules after a module copier, thus the pin/queue index is
ignored.
For the process module case, the code was likely have been tested in a
controlled way where all the pin/queue/format properties were present to
work.

Update the debug prints to have better information.

Reviewed-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+
---
 sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Brown June 24, 2024, 12:36 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 02:15:18PM +0200, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+
> ---

Please put fixes at the start of serieses, or send them separately -
it makes things much easier to handle if they're separate.  This ensures
that the fixes don't end up with spurious dependencies on non-fix
changes.
Pierre-Louis Bossart June 24, 2024, 3:26 p.m. UTC | #2
On 6/24/24 14:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 02:15:18PM +0200, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+
>> ---
> 
> Please put fixes at the start of serieses, or send them separately -
> it makes things much easier to handle if they're separate.  This ensures
> that the fixes don't end up with spurious dependencies on non-fix
> changes.

Agree, I wasn't sure if this was really linux-stable material, this
patch fixes problems on to-be-released topologies but it doesn't have
any effect on existing user setups. At the same time, it certainly fixes
a conceptual bug. Not sure if the tag is needed for those cases?
Mark Brown June 24, 2024, 6:11 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 05:26:32PM +0200, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 6/24/24 14:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 02:15:18PM +0200, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> >> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> >> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+

> > Please put fixes at the start of serieses, or send them separately -
> > it makes things much easier to handle if they're separate.  This ensures
> > that the fixes don't end up with spurious dependencies on non-fix
> > changes.

> Agree, I wasn't sure if this was really linux-stable material, this
> patch fixes problems on to-be-released topologies but it doesn't have
> any effect on existing user setups. At the same time, it certainly fixes
> a conceptual bug. Not sure if the tag is needed for those cases?

Given the enthusiasm with which stable backports things it's probably
fine, I suspect the device quirks might end up getting pulled back.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c b/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c
index ce2910f70e65..90f6856ee80c 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c
@@ -2869,7 +2869,7 @@  static void sof_ipc4_put_queue_id(struct snd_sof_widget *swidget, int queue_id,
 static int sof_ipc4_set_copier_sink_format(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
 					   struct snd_sof_widget *src_widget,
 					   struct snd_sof_widget *sink_widget,
-					   int sink_id)
+					   struct snd_sof_route *sroute)
 {
 	struct sof_ipc4_copier_config_set_sink_format format;
 	const struct sof_ipc_ops *iops = sdev->ipc->ops;
@@ -2878,9 +2878,6 @@  static int sof_ipc4_set_copier_sink_format(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
 	struct sof_ipc4_fw_module *fw_module;
 	struct sof_ipc4_msg msg = {{ 0 }};
 
-	dev_dbg(sdev->dev, "%s set copier sink %d format\n",
-		src_widget->widget->name, sink_id);
-
 	if (WIDGET_IS_DAI(src_widget->id)) {
 		struct snd_sof_dai *dai = src_widget->private;
 
@@ -2891,13 +2888,15 @@  static int sof_ipc4_set_copier_sink_format(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
 
 	fw_module = src_widget->module_info;
 
-	format.sink_id = sink_id;
+	format.sink_id = sroute->src_queue_id;
 	memcpy(&format.source_fmt, &src_config->audio_fmt, sizeof(format.source_fmt));
 
-	pin_fmt = sof_ipc4_get_input_pin_audio_fmt(sink_widget, sink_id);
+	pin_fmt = sof_ipc4_get_input_pin_audio_fmt(sink_widget, sroute->dst_queue_id);
 	if (!pin_fmt) {
-		dev_err(sdev->dev, "Unable to get pin %d format for %s",
-			sink_id, sink_widget->widget->name);
+		dev_err(sdev->dev,
+			"Failed to get input audio format of %s:%d for output of %s:%d\n",
+			sink_widget->widget->name, sroute->dst_queue_id,
+			src_widget->widget->name, sroute->src_queue_id);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -2955,7 +2954,8 @@  static int sof_ipc4_route_setup(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, struct snd_sof_route *
 	sroute->src_queue_id = sof_ipc4_get_queue_id(src_widget, sink_widget,
 						     SOF_PIN_TYPE_OUTPUT);
 	if (sroute->src_queue_id < 0) {
-		dev_err(sdev->dev, "failed to get queue ID for source widget: %s\n",
+		dev_err(sdev->dev,
+			"failed to get src_queue_id ID from source widget %s\n",
 			src_widget->widget->name);
 		return sroute->src_queue_id;
 	}
@@ -2963,7 +2963,8 @@  static int sof_ipc4_route_setup(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, struct snd_sof_route *
 	sroute->dst_queue_id = sof_ipc4_get_queue_id(src_widget, sink_widget,
 						     SOF_PIN_TYPE_INPUT);
 	if (sroute->dst_queue_id < 0) {
-		dev_err(sdev->dev, "failed to get queue ID for sink widget: %s\n",
+		dev_err(sdev->dev,
+			"failed to get dst_queue_id ID from sink widget %s\n",
 			sink_widget->widget->name);
 		sof_ipc4_put_queue_id(src_widget, sroute->src_queue_id,
 				      SOF_PIN_TYPE_OUTPUT);
@@ -2972,10 +2973,11 @@  static int sof_ipc4_route_setup(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, struct snd_sof_route *
 
 	/* Pin 0 format is already set during copier module init */
 	if (sroute->src_queue_id > 0 && WIDGET_IS_COPIER(src_widget->id)) {
-		ret = sof_ipc4_set_copier_sink_format(sdev, src_widget, sink_widget,
-						      sroute->src_queue_id);
+		ret = sof_ipc4_set_copier_sink_format(sdev, src_widget,
+						      sink_widget, sroute);
 		if (ret < 0) {
-			dev_err(sdev->dev, "failed to set sink format for %s source queue ID %d\n",
+			dev_err(sdev->dev,
+				"failed to set sink format for source %s:%d\n",
 				src_widget->widget->name, sroute->src_queue_id);
 			goto out;
 		}