Message ID | 874l00yzxm.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | ASoC: soc-dpcm: tidyup for_each_dpcm_xx() macro | expand |
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:10:29AM +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> > > for_each_dpcm_xx() macro is using "dpcm" as parameter (1), > but, it is also struct member (2). This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.
Hi Mark > > From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> > > > > for_each_dpcm_xx() macro is using "dpcm" as parameter (1), > > but, it is also struct member (2). > > This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend. Oops. OK, I will post v2 patch soon. Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
diff --git a/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h b/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h index ff53037..fbe9e3d 100644 --- a/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h +++ b/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h @@ -103,13 +103,13 @@ struct snd_soc_dpcm_runtime { int trigger_pending; /* trigger cmd + 1 if pending, 0 if not */ }; -#define for_each_dpcm_fe(be, stream, dpcm) \ - list_for_each_entry(dpcm, &(be)->dpcm[stream].fe_clients, list_fe) +#define for_each_dpcm_fe(be, stream, _dpcm) \ + list_for_each_entry(_dpcm, &(be)->dpcm[stream].fe_clients, list_fe) -#define for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm) \ - list_for_each_entry(dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be) -#define for_each_dpcm_be_safe(fe, stream, dpcm, _dpcm) \ - list_for_each_entry_safe(dpcm, _dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be) +#define for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, _dpcm) \ + list_for_each_entry(_dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be) +#define for_each_dpcm_be_safe(fe, stream, _dpcm, __dpcm) \ + list_for_each_entry_safe(_dpcm, __dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be) /* can this BE stop and free */ int snd_soc_dpcm_can_be_free_stop(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,