From patchwork Fri Aug 23 00:59:30 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kuninori Morimoto X-Patchwork-Id: 11110299 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33853112C for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 01:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD9772173E for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 01:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="nsBDUeOG" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BD9772173E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=renesas.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10E711677; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 03:05:08 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 10E711677 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1566522358; bh=oT5K30ObbIuqbjL4GT90GkAOqoBQgfIsfHLIT1pxsDs=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=nsBDUeOG6IIRLwPau6wufBp5lgwkusTgQW34JQvas4noh/Phc7I/lcnP9/Jv1JHi9 XQCFsqk8Ke4jovDljC5G1rhXlVF2kTlpRDqgQpcBtz++aZxn5EMksv6gWEf7A2RzbV q2F/3UhR5Ct3sbblxuhDdmVUUmxx1xXZNMQybsVI= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD09DF80673; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 02:59:38 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Delivered-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id CDE82F80673; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 02:59:37 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on alsa1.perex.cz X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from relmlie6.idc.renesas.com (relmlor2.renesas.com [210.160.252.172]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C96F80659 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 02:59:31 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz D1C96F80659 Date: 23 Aug 2019 09:59:30 +0900 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,419,1559487600"; d="scan'208";a="24476550" Received: from unknown (HELO relmlir5.idc.renesas.com) ([10.200.68.151]) by relmlie6.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP; 23 Aug 2019 09:59:30 +0900 Received: from morimoto-PC.renesas.com (unknown [10.166.18.140]) by relmlir5.idc.renesas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F90400D0F5; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 09:59:30 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <87imqo7lah.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> From: Kuninori Morimoto User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 To: Mark Brown In-Reply-To: <87wof47ldc.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> References: <87wof47ldc.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Cc: Linux-ALSA Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 10/16] ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_dai() next to soc_remove_dai() X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" From: Kuninori Morimoto It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to debug. This patch moves soc_probe_dai() next to soc_remove_dai() which is paired function. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto --- sound/soc/soc-core.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c index c4581ba..ab0e4ba 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c @@ -1104,6 +1104,26 @@ static void soc_remove_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int order) dai->probed = 0; } +static int soc_probe_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int order) +{ + int ret; + + if (dai->probed || + dai->driver->probe_order != order) + return 0; + + ret = snd_soc_dai_probe(dai); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dai->dev, "ASoC: failed to probe DAI %s: %d\n", + dai->name, ret); + return ret; + } + + dai->probed = 1; + + return 0; +} + static void soc_rtd_free(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd); /* remove me */ static void soc_remove_link_dais(struct snd_soc_card *card) { @@ -1409,26 +1429,6 @@ static int soc_rtd_init(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, const char *name) return 0; } -static int soc_probe_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int order) -{ - int ret; - - if (dai->probed || - dai->driver->probe_order != order) - return 0; - - ret = snd_soc_dai_probe(dai); - if (ret < 0) { - dev_err(dai->dev, "ASoC: failed to probe DAI %s: %d\n", - dai->name, ret); - return ret; - } - - dai->probed = 1; - - return 0; -} - static int soc_link_dai_pcm_new(struct snd_soc_dai **dais, int num_dais, struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd) {