diff mbox series

ASoC: soc-core: remove verbose check from snd_soc_of_parse_tdm_slot()

Message ID 87o6zf3gg0.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series ASoC: soc-core: remove verbose check from snd_soc_of_parse_tdm_slot() | expand

Commit Message

Kuninori Morimoto Feb. 6, 2025, 3:22 a.m. UTC
The reason of of_property_read_u32() returns error are

	(A) -EINVAL:    if the property does not exist
	(B) -ENODATA:   if property does not have a value
	(C) -EOVERFLOW: if the property data isn't large enough

Property does not exist (A) is not error in this function.
So, current code returns error if (B) or (C) case.

But these are handled by "DT checker". We don't need to check it in the
code. Let's remove it

Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
---
 sound/soc/soc-core.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Brown Feb. 6, 2025, 11:19 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:22:39AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> The reason of of_property_read_u32() returns error are
> 
> 	(A) -EINVAL:    if the property does not exist
> 	(B) -ENODATA:   if property does not have a value
> 	(C) -EOVERFLOW: if the property data isn't large enough
> 
> Property does not exist (A) is not error in this function.
> So, current code returns error if (B) or (C) case.
> 
> But these are handled by "DT checker". We don't need to check it in the
> code. Let's remove it

We're assuming that people actually run the validation tools, which the
reports that Rob sends out from his bot seem to indicate doesn't happen
reliably and I'd expect would be even less relaible with out of tree
DTs.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index af75e59dec377..1db86438abf04 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
@@ -3117,14 +3117,10 @@  int snd_soc_of_parse_tdm_slot(struct device_node *np,
 		snd_soc_of_get_slot_mask(np, "dai-tdm-slot-rx-mask", rx_mask);
 
 	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "dai-tdm-slot-num", &val);
-	if (ret && ret != -EINVAL)
-		return ret;
 	if (!ret && slots)
 		*slots = val;
 
 	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "dai-tdm-slot-width", &val);
-	if (ret && ret != -EINVAL)
-		return ret;
 	if (!ret && slot_width)
 		*slot_width = val;