From patchwork Wed Nov 13 01:16:29 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kuninori Morimoto X-Patchwork-Id: 11240633 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E43213BD for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 01:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A085222CD for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 01:17:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="j0d0Gca2" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8A085222CD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=renesas.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4F821655; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 02:16:53 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz D4F821655 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1573607864; bh=bOKvoipuEsilHELRcvGJbkZsUdqXppMh39e5543nLro=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=j0d0Gca2Me/MAiWqn2o5GgMTYIyYGbKYPr2c+mQTlL8twaa0nRmj2TD2RfldJ5EUP D18tV7og4B5Js0dhBzS7/knDh4c0BEzimvPszD6jZGM1wXYmYFA7h/b3DwwfYPnexF OXzsL7RyMRIFyNi15ouxhHeF+r+wIn+gFqtZAaLA= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3FCF805FC; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 02:16:36 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Delivered-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 21716F805FE; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 02:16:35 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on alsa1.perex.cz X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from relmlie5.idc.renesas.com (relmlor1.renesas.com [210.160.252.171]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5408F805FB for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 02:16:30 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz E5408F805FB Date: 13 Nov 2019 10:16:29 +0900 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,298,1569250800"; d="scan'208";a="31524279" Received: from unknown (HELO relmlir5.idc.renesas.com) ([10.200.68.151]) by relmlie5.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2019 10:16:29 +0900 Received: from morimoto-PC.renesas.com (unknown [10.166.18.140]) by relmlir5.idc.renesas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D5640041AC; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:16:29 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <87r22c4lub.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> From: Kuninori Morimoto User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 To: Mark Brown In-Reply-To: <87sgms4lvf.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> References: <87sgms4lvf.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Cc: Linux-ALSA Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: soc-core: call snd_soc_dapm_shutdown() at soc_cleanup_card_resources() X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" From: Kuninori Morimoto It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to debug. snd_soc_bind_card() is calling snd_soc_dapm_init() for both card and component. Let's call paired snd_soc_dapm_shutdown() at paired soc_cleanup_card_resources(). Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto --- sound/soc/soc-core.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c index 92260a9..216000a 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c @@ -1953,6 +1953,8 @@ static void soc_cleanup_card_resources(struct snd_soc_card *card) card->snd_card = NULL; } + snd_soc_dapm_shutdown(card); + /* remove and free each DAI */ soc_remove_link_dais(card); @@ -2389,7 +2391,6 @@ static void snd_soc_unbind_card(struct snd_soc_card *card, bool unregister) { if (card->instantiated) { card->instantiated = false; - snd_soc_dapm_shutdown(card); snd_soc_flush_all_delayed_work(card); soc_cleanup_card_resources(card);