From patchwork Fri Aug 23 00:58:37 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kuninori Morimoto X-Patchwork-Id: 11110283 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229471395 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 01:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA05623405 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 01:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="V7cd6YqO" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AA05623405 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=renesas.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E70301677; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 02:59:47 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz E70301677 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1566522038; bh=B6WfMUQdKgVYhwVg4X/QVc256IPBLuYDLFDG5xLHwxI=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=V7cd6YqOmNkqB4BnJiScnb4l1ThWw8CS0soP4SfJr5jPCAAKKaa6SMxjBKx7PpRAD /mT1H22mgV46SF8Q1sZbtmXJQiZZ5HEc4WKN4Yt+sO0B0khO1CPOWJRjTX4o4ossD2 FRkT943vNkwZMh5zY6i96vXqQG6dXvywvQ8hfbJs= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0435DF805E2; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 02:58:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Delivered-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 335F9F80391; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 02:58:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on alsa1.perex.cz X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from relmlie5.idc.renesas.com (relmlor1.renesas.com [210.160.252.171]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD3CF80391 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 02:58:37 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz EDD3CF80391 Date: 23 Aug 2019 09:58:37 +0900 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,419,1559487600"; d="scan'208";a="24695121" Received: from unknown (HELO relmlir5.idc.renesas.com) ([10.200.68.151]) by relmlie5.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP; 23 Aug 2019 09:58:37 +0900 Received: from morimoto-PC.renesas.com (unknown [10.166.18.140]) by relmlir5.idc.renesas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72171400D0FF; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 09:58:37 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <87tva87lby.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> From: Kuninori Morimoto User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 To: Mark Brown In-Reply-To: <87wof47ldc.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> References: <87wof47ldc.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Cc: Linux-ALSA Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 02/16] ASoC: soc-core: add soc_rtd_free() X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" From: Kuninori Morimoto It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to debug. soc_rtd_init() was soc_post_component_init(), but there was no its paired soc_post_component_free(), but it is done at soc_remove_link_dais(). This means it is difficult to find related code. This patch adds soc_rtd_free() which is paired soc_rtd_init(). soc_rtd_xxx() will be more cleanuped in the future. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto --- sound/soc/soc-core.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c index 3c087b4..3754a08 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c @@ -975,17 +975,15 @@ static void soc_remove_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int order) dai->probed = 0; } +static void soc_rtd_free(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd); /* remove me */ static void soc_remove_link_dais(struct snd_soc_card *card, struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int order) { int i; struct snd_soc_dai *codec_dai; - /* unregister the rtd device */ - if (rtd->dev_registered) { - device_unregister(rtd->dev); - rtd->dev_registered = 0; - } + /* finalize rtd device */ + soc_rtd_free(rtd); /* remove the CODEC DAI */ for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) @@ -1340,6 +1338,15 @@ static int soc_probe_component(struct snd_soc_card *card, return ret; } +static void soc_rtd_free(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd) +{ + if (rtd->dev_registered) { + /* we don't need to call kfree() for rtd->dev */ + device_unregister(rtd->dev); + rtd->dev_registered = 0; + } +} + static void soc_rtd_release(struct device *dev) { kfree(dev);