From patchwork Wed Sep 4 00:15:06 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kuninori Morimoto X-Patchwork-Id: 11129091 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B92B14DE for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 00:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1C8622DBF for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 00:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="kbS7/BgX" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B1C8622DBF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=renesas.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E38C41689; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 02:17:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz E38C41689 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1567556326; bh=EMGGLBK6k1TVCtPOgZw123Vfs0NAUT8EJqS7Gir2Ci8=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=kbS7/BgX4m0e4BAWExHsuQD70VIymnipDPkvxsqJFegKz2iXJc5+3mMOhyK/A5PL6 dKpPX+qvD70/Cs67IsAi+DXtzhDNFpnsUIn0dgMqyEg19pTHUM5rxDv9KACj9SRih6 SjpvUJS9mVgU5YPj8PFP900CcaXbDOJSYAWsCeJg= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3205BF80612; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 02:15:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Delivered-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id D0CFAF80633; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 02:15:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on alsa1.perex.cz X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from relmlie6.idc.renesas.com (relmlor2.renesas.com [210.160.252.172]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185A5F80610 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 02:15:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 185A5F80610 Date: 04 Sep 2019 09:15:06 +0900 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,464,1559487600"; d="scan'208";a="25447207" Received: from unknown (HELO relmlir5.idc.renesas.com) ([10.200.68.151]) by relmlie6.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP; 04 Sep 2019 09:15:06 +0900 Received: from morimoto-PC.renesas.com (unknown [10.166.18.140]) by relmlir5.idc.renesas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F5A400264F; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 09:15:06 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <87zhjkor1x.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> From: Kuninori Morimoto User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 To: Mark Brown In-Reply-To: <877e6oq5nv.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> References: <877e6oq5nv.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Cc: Linux-ALSA Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH resend 05/11] ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_dai() next to soc_remove_dai() X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" From: Kuninori Morimoto It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to debug. This patch moves soc_probe_dai() next to soc_remove_dai() which is paired function. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto --- sound/soc/soc-core.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c index 0a13f94..3ca5a21b 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c @@ -1106,6 +1106,26 @@ static void soc_remove_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int order) dai->probed = 0; } +static int soc_probe_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int order) +{ + int ret; + + if (dai->probed || + dai->driver->probe_order != order) + return 0; + + ret = snd_soc_dai_probe(dai); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dai->dev, "ASoC: failed to probe DAI %s: %d\n", + dai->name, ret); + return ret; + } + + dai->probed = 1; + + return 0; +} + static void soc_rtd_free(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd); /* remove me */ static void soc_remove_link_dais(struct snd_soc_card *card) { @@ -1411,26 +1431,6 @@ static int soc_rtd_init(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, const char *name) return 0; } -static int soc_probe_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int order) -{ - int ret; - - if (dai->probed || - dai->driver->probe_order != order) - return 0; - - ret = snd_soc_dai_probe(dai); - if (ret < 0) { - dev_err(dai->dev, "ASoC: failed to probe DAI %s: %d\n", - dai->name, ret); - return ret; - } - - dai->probed = 1; - - return 0; -} - static int soc_link_dai_pcm_new(struct snd_soc_dai **dais, int num_dais, struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd) {