diff mbox series

ath11k: Remove unnecessary enum scan_priority

Message ID 20191211192252.35024-1-natechancellor@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series ath11k: Remove unnecessary enum scan_priority | expand

Commit Message

Nathan Chancellor Dec. 11, 2019, 7:22 p.m. UTC
Clang warns:

drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.c:1827:23: warning: implicit
conversion from enumeration type 'enum wmi_scan_priority' to different
enumeration type 'enum scan_priority' [-Wenum-conversion]
        arg->scan_priority = WMI_SCAN_PRIORITY_LOW;
                           ~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.

wmi_scan_priority and scan_priority have the same values but the wmi one
has WMI prefixed to the names. Since that enum is already being used,
get rid of scan_priority and switch its one use to wmi_scan_priority to
fix this warning.

Fixes: d5c65159f289 ("ath11k: driver for Qualcomm IEEE 802.11ax devices")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/808
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h | 11 +----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Nick Desaulniers Dec. 12, 2019, 7:34 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:23 AM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Clang warns:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.c:1827:23: warning: implicit
> conversion from enumeration type 'enum wmi_scan_priority' to different
> enumeration type 'enum scan_priority' [-Wenum-conversion]
>         arg->scan_priority = WMI_SCAN_PRIORITY_LOW;
>                            ~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 1 warning generated.
>
> wmi_scan_priority and scan_priority have the same values but the wmi one
> has WMI prefixed to the names. Since that enum is already being used,
> get rid of scan_priority and switch its one use to wmi_scan_priority to
> fix this warning.
>
> Fixes: d5c65159f289 ("ath11k: driver for Qualcomm IEEE 802.11ax devices")
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/808
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>

Further, it looks like the member `scan_priority` in `struct
wmi_start_scan_arg` and `struct wmi_start_scan_cmd` should probably
use `enum wmi_scan_priority`, rather than `u32`.  Also, I don't know
if the more concisely named enum is preferable?  Either way, thanks
for the patch.
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>

> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h | 11 +----------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h
> index 4a518d406bc5..756101656391 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h
> @@ -2896,15 +2896,6 @@ struct wmi_bcn_offload_ctrl_cmd {
>         u32 bcn_ctrl_op;
>  } __packed;
>
> -enum scan_priority {
> -       SCAN_PRIORITY_VERY_LOW,
> -       SCAN_PRIORITY_LOW,
> -       SCAN_PRIORITY_MEDIUM,
> -       SCAN_PRIORITY_HIGH,
> -       SCAN_PRIORITY_VERY_HIGH,
> -       SCAN_PRIORITY_COUNT,
> -};
> -
>  enum scan_dwelltime_adaptive_mode {
>         SCAN_DWELL_MODE_DEFAULT = 0,
>         SCAN_DWELL_MODE_CONSERVATIVE = 1,
> @@ -3056,7 +3047,7 @@ struct scan_req_params {
>         u32 scan_req_id;
>         u32 vdev_id;
>         u32 pdev_id;
> -       enum scan_priority scan_priority;
> +       enum wmi_scan_priority scan_priority;
>         union {
>                 struct {
>                         u32 scan_ev_started:1,
> --
> 2.24.0
>
> --
Kalle Valo Dec. 18, 2019, 5:51 p.m. UTC | #2
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:

> Clang warns:
> 
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.c:1827:23: warning: implicit
> conversion from enumeration type 'enum wmi_scan_priority' to different
> enumeration type 'enum scan_priority' [-Wenum-conversion]
>         arg->scan_priority = WMI_SCAN_PRIORITY_LOW;
>                            ~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 1 warning generated.
> 
> wmi_scan_priority and scan_priority have the same values but the wmi one
> has WMI prefixed to the names. Since that enum is already being used,
> get rid of scan_priority and switch its one use to wmi_scan_priority to
> fix this warning.
> 
> Fixes: d5c65159f289 ("ath11k: driver for Qualcomm IEEE 802.11ax devices")
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/808
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>

Patch applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks.

509421acab69 ath11k: Remove unnecessary enum scan_priority
Kalle Valo Dec. 19, 2019, 1:31 p.m. UTC | #3
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> writes:

> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:23 AM Nathan Chancellor
> <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Clang warns:
>>
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.c:1827:23: warning: implicit
>> conversion from enumeration type 'enum wmi_scan_priority' to different
>> enumeration type 'enum scan_priority' [-Wenum-conversion]
>>         arg->scan_priority = WMI_SCAN_PRIORITY_LOW;
>>                            ~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> 1 warning generated.
>>
>> wmi_scan_priority and scan_priority have the same values but the wmi one
>> has WMI prefixed to the names. Since that enum is already being used,
>> get rid of scan_priority and switch its one use to wmi_scan_priority to
>> fix this warning.
>>
>> Fixes: d5c65159f289 ("ath11k: driver for Qualcomm IEEE 802.11ax devices")
>> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/808
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
>
> Further, it looks like the member `scan_priority` in `struct
> wmi_start_scan_arg` and `struct wmi_start_scan_cmd` should probably
> use `enum wmi_scan_priority`, rather than `u32`.

struct wmi_start_scan_cmd is sent to firmware and that's why it has u32
to make sure that the size is exactly 32 bits.

> Also, I don't know if the more concisely named enum is preferable?

I didn't get this comment.
Nick Desaulniers Dec. 19, 2019, 5:06 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 5:32 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:23 AM Nathan Chancellor
> > <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> wmi_scan_priority and scan_priority have the same values but the wmi one
> >> has WMI prefixed to the names. Since that enum is already being used,
> >> get rid of scan_priority and switch its one use to wmi_scan_priority to
> >> fix this warning.
> >>
> > Also, I don't know if the more concisely named enum is preferable?
>
> I didn't get this comment.

Given two enums with the same values:
enum scan_priority
enum wmi_scan_priority
wouldn't you prefer to type wmi_ a few times less?  Doesn't really
matter, but that was the point I was making.
Kalle Valo Dec. 20, 2019, 7:19 a.m. UTC | #5
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> writes:

> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 5:32 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:23 AM Nathan Chancellor
>> > <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> wmi_scan_priority and scan_priority have the same values but the wmi one
>> >> has WMI prefixed to the names. Since that enum is already being used,
>> >> get rid of scan_priority and switch its one use to wmi_scan_priority to
>> >> fix this warning.
>> >>
>> > Also, I don't know if the more concisely named enum is preferable?
>>
>> I didn't get this comment.
>
> Given two enums with the same values:
> enum scan_priority
> enum wmi_scan_priority
> wouldn't you prefer to type wmi_ a few times less?  Doesn't really
> matter, but that was the point I was making.

Ah, now I got it :) This enum is part of firmware interface (WMI) so
yes, I prefer to use the wmi_ prefix to make that obvious.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h
index 4a518d406bc5..756101656391 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.h
@@ -2896,15 +2896,6 @@  struct wmi_bcn_offload_ctrl_cmd {
 	u32 bcn_ctrl_op;
 } __packed;
 
-enum scan_priority {
-	SCAN_PRIORITY_VERY_LOW,
-	SCAN_PRIORITY_LOW,
-	SCAN_PRIORITY_MEDIUM,
-	SCAN_PRIORITY_HIGH,
-	SCAN_PRIORITY_VERY_HIGH,
-	SCAN_PRIORITY_COUNT,
-};
-
 enum scan_dwelltime_adaptive_mode {
 	SCAN_DWELL_MODE_DEFAULT = 0,
 	SCAN_DWELL_MODE_CONSERVATIVE = 1,
@@ -3056,7 +3047,7 @@  struct scan_req_params {
 	u32 scan_req_id;
 	u32 vdev_id;
 	u32 pdev_id;
-	enum scan_priority scan_priority;
+	enum wmi_scan_priority scan_priority;
 	union {
 		struct {
 			u32 scan_ev_started:1,