diff mbox series

Bluetooth: Fix: LL PRivacy BLE device fails to connect

Message ID 20201022082304.31757-1-sathish.narasimman@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Bluetooth: Fix: LL PRivacy BLE device fails to connect | expand

Commit Message

Sathish Narasimman Oct. 22, 2020, 8:23 a.m. UTC
When adding device to white list the device is added to resolving list
also it has to be added only when HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY flag is set.
HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY flag has to be tested before adding/deleting devices
to resolving list. use_ll_privacy macro is used only to check if controller
supports LL_Privacy.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209745

Signed-off-by: Sathish Narasimman <sathish.narasimman@intel.com>
---
 net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Sathish Narasimman Oct. 28, 2020, 5:30 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 1:47 PM Sathish Narasimman <nsathish41@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When adding device to white list the device is added to resolving list
> also it has to be added only when HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY flag is set.
> HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY flag has to be tested before adding/deleting devices
> to resolving list. use_ll_privacy macro is used only to check if controller
> supports LL_Privacy.
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209745
>
> Signed-off-by: Sathish Narasimman <sathish.narasimman@intel.com>
> ---
>  net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> index 6f12bab4d2fa..610ed0817bd7 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> @@ -698,7 +698,8 @@ static void del_from_white_list(struct hci_request *req, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
>                    cp.bdaddr_type);
>         hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_DEL_FROM_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp);
>
> -       if (use_ll_privacy(req->hdev)) {
> +       if (use_ll_privacy(req->hdev) &&
> +           hci_dev_test_flag(req->hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY)) {
>                 struct smp_irk *irk;
>
>                 irk = hci_find_irk_by_addr(req->hdev, bdaddr, bdaddr_type);
> @@ -732,7 +733,8 @@ static int add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req,
>                 return -1;
>
>         /* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> -       if (!allow_rpa && !use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
> +       if (!allow_rpa &&
> +           !hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY) &&
>             hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &params->addr, params->addr_type)) {
>                 return -1;
>         }
> @@ -750,7 +752,8 @@ static int add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req,
>                    cp.bdaddr_type);
>         hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_ADD_TO_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp);
>
> -       if (use_ll_privacy(hdev)) {
> +       if (use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
> +           hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY)) {
>                 struct smp_irk *irk;
>
>                 irk = hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &params->addr,
> @@ -812,7 +815,8 @@ static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req)
>                 }
>
>                 /* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> -               if (!allow_rpa && !use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
> +               if (!allow_rpa &&
> +                   !hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY) &&
>                     hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &b->bdaddr, b->bdaddr_type)) {
>                         return 0x00;
>                 }
> --
> 2.17.1
>


Gentle reminder.
Seems Many devices are failing to reconnect after every on 5.9 kernel

This patch will FIX the issue

Regards
Sathish N
Luiz Augusto von Dentz Oct. 29, 2020, 12:20 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Sathish,

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:04 AM Sathish Narasimman <nsathish41@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When adding device to white list the device is added to resolving list
> also it has to be added only when HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY flag is set.
> HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY flag has to be tested before adding/deleting devices
> to resolving list. use_ll_privacy macro is used only to check if controller
> supports LL_Privacy.
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209745
>
> Signed-off-by: Sathish Narasimman <sathish.narasimman@intel.com>
> ---
>  net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> index 6f12bab4d2fa..610ed0817bd7 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> @@ -698,7 +698,8 @@ static void del_from_white_list(struct hci_request *req, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
>                    cp.bdaddr_type);
>         hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_DEL_FROM_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp);
>
> -       if (use_ll_privacy(req->hdev)) {
> +       if (use_ll_privacy(req->hdev) &&
> +           hci_dev_test_flag(req->hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY)) {
>                 struct smp_irk *irk;
>
>                 irk = hci_find_irk_by_addr(req->hdev, bdaddr, bdaddr_type);
> @@ -732,7 +733,8 @@ static int add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req,
>                 return -1;
>
>         /* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> -       if (!allow_rpa && !use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
> +       if (!allow_rpa &&
> +           !hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY) &&
>             hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &params->addr, params->addr_type)) {
>                 return -1;
>         }
> @@ -750,7 +752,8 @@ static int add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req,
>                    cp.bdaddr_type);
>         hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_ADD_TO_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp);
>
> -       if (use_ll_privacy(hdev)) {
> +       if (use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
> +           hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY)) {
>                 struct smp_irk *irk;
>
>                 irk = hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &params->addr,
> @@ -812,7 +815,8 @@ static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req)
>                 }
>
>                 /* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> -               if (!allow_rpa && !use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
> +               if (!allow_rpa &&
> +                   !hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY) &&
>                     hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &b->bdaddr, b->bdaddr_type)) {
>                         return 0x00;
>                 }
> --
> 2.17.1
>

Reviewed-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Luiz Augusto von Dentz Oct. 29, 2020, 12:22 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Sathish,

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 4:46 PM Sathish Narasimman <nsathish41@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 1:47 PM Sathish Narasimman <nsathish41@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > When adding device to white list the device is added to resolving list
> > also it has to be added only when HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY flag is set.
> > HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY flag has to be tested before adding/deleting devices
> > to resolving list. use_ll_privacy macro is used only to check if controller
> > supports LL_Privacy.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209745
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sathish Narasimman <sathish.narasimman@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 12 ++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> > index 6f12bab4d2fa..610ed0817bd7 100644
> > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> > @@ -698,7 +698,8 @@ static void del_from_white_list(struct hci_request *req, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
> >                    cp.bdaddr_type);
> >         hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_DEL_FROM_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp);
> >
> > -       if (use_ll_privacy(req->hdev)) {
> > +       if (use_ll_privacy(req->hdev) &&
> > +           hci_dev_test_flag(req->hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY)) {
> >                 struct smp_irk *irk;
> >
> >                 irk = hci_find_irk_by_addr(req->hdev, bdaddr, bdaddr_type);
> > @@ -732,7 +733,8 @@ static int add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req,
> >                 return -1;
> >
> >         /* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> > -       if (!allow_rpa && !use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
> > +       if (!allow_rpa &&
> > +           !hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY) &&
> >             hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &params->addr, params->addr_type)) {
> >                 return -1;
> >         }
> > @@ -750,7 +752,8 @@ static int add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req,
> >                    cp.bdaddr_type);
> >         hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_ADD_TO_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp);
> >
> > -       if (use_ll_privacy(hdev)) {
> > +       if (use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
> > +           hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY)) {
> >                 struct smp_irk *irk;
> >
> >                 irk = hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &params->addr,
> > @@ -812,7 +815,8 @@ static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req)
> >                 }
> >
> >                 /* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> > -               if (!allow_rpa && !use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
> > +               if (!allow_rpa &&
> > +                   !hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY) &&
> >                     hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &b->bdaddr, b->bdaddr_type)) {
> >                         return 0x00;
> >                 }
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
>
> Gentle reminder.
> Seems Many devices are failing to reconnect after every on 5.9 kernel
>
> This patch will FIX the issue

Btw, you should probably mention the commit id that introduced this regression.
Sathish Narasimman Oct. 29, 2020, 7:27 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi Luiz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 5:52 AM
> To: Sathish Narasimman <nsathish41@gmail.com>
> Cc: Bluez mailing list <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>; Tumkur Narayan,
> Chethan <chethan.tumkur.narayan@intel.com>; Srivatsa, Ravishankar
> <ravishankar.srivatsa@intel.com>; K, Kiran <kiran.k@intel.com>;
> Narasimman, Sathish <sathish.narasimman@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix: LL PRivacy BLE device fails to connect
> 
> Hi Sathish,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 4:46 PM Sathish Narasimman
> <nsathish41@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 1:47 PM Sathish Narasimman
> <nsathish41@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > When adding device to white list the device is added to resolving
> > > list also it has to be added only when HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY flag is set.
> > > HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY flag has to be tested before adding/deleting
> > > devices to resolving list. use_ll_privacy macro is used only to
> > > check if controller supports LL_Privacy.
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209745
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sathish Narasimman <sathish.narasimman@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 12 ++++++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> > > b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c index 6f12bab4d2fa..610ed0817bd7
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> > > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> > > @@ -698,7 +698,8 @@ static void del_from_white_list(struct hci_request
> *req, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
> > >                    cp.bdaddr_type);
> > >         hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_DEL_FROM_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp),
> > > &cp);
> > >
> > > -       if (use_ll_privacy(req->hdev)) {
> > > +       if (use_ll_privacy(req->hdev) &&
> > > +           hci_dev_test_flag(req->hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY)) {
> > >                 struct smp_irk *irk;
> > >
> > >                 irk = hci_find_irk_by_addr(req->hdev, bdaddr,
> > > bdaddr_type); @@ -732,7 +733,8 @@ static int add_to_white_list(struct
> hci_request *req,
> > >                 return -1;
> > >
> > >         /* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> > > -       if (!allow_rpa && !use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
> > > +       if (!allow_rpa &&
> > > +           !hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY) &&
> > >             hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &params->addr, params->addr_type))
> {
> > >                 return -1;
> > >         }
> > > @@ -750,7 +752,8 @@ static int add_to_white_list(struct hci_request
> *req,
> > >                    cp.bdaddr_type);
> > >         hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_ADD_TO_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp),
> > > &cp);
> > >
> > > -       if (use_ll_privacy(hdev)) {
> > > +       if (use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
> > > +           hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY)) {
> > >                 struct smp_irk *irk;
> > >
> > >                 irk = hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &params->addr, @@
> > > -812,7 +815,8 @@ static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req)
> > >                 }
> > >
> > >                 /* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> > > -               if (!allow_rpa && !use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
> > > +               if (!allow_rpa &&
> > > +                   !hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY)
> > > + &&
> > >                     hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &b->bdaddr, b->bdaddr_type)) {
> > >                         return 0x00;
> > >                 }
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
> >
> >
> > Gentle reminder.
> > Seems Many devices are failing to reconnect after every on 5.9 kernel
> >
> > This patch will FIX the issue
> 
> Btw, you should probably mention the commit id that introduced this
> regression.
Will update the same in v2 of the patch

> 
> --
> Luiz Augusto von Dentz
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
index 6f12bab4d2fa..610ed0817bd7 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
@@ -698,7 +698,8 @@  static void del_from_white_list(struct hci_request *req, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
 		   cp.bdaddr_type);
 	hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_DEL_FROM_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp);
 
-	if (use_ll_privacy(req->hdev)) {
+	if (use_ll_privacy(req->hdev) &&
+	    hci_dev_test_flag(req->hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY)) {
 		struct smp_irk *irk;
 
 		irk = hci_find_irk_by_addr(req->hdev, bdaddr, bdaddr_type);
@@ -732,7 +733,8 @@  static int add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req,
 		return -1;
 
 	/* White list can not be used with RPAs */
-	if (!allow_rpa && !use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
+	if (!allow_rpa &&
+	    !hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY) &&
 	    hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &params->addr, params->addr_type)) {
 		return -1;
 	}
@@ -750,7 +752,8 @@  static int add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req,
 		   cp.bdaddr_type);
 	hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_ADD_TO_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp);
 
-	if (use_ll_privacy(hdev)) {
+	if (use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
+	    hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY)) {
 		struct smp_irk *irk;
 
 		irk = hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &params->addr,
@@ -812,7 +815,8 @@  static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req)
 		}
 
 		/* White list can not be used with RPAs */
-		if (!allow_rpa && !use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
+		if (!allow_rpa &&
+		    !hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_ENABLE_LL_PRIVACY) &&
 		    hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &b->bdaddr, b->bdaddr_type)) {
 			return 0x00;
 		}