diff mbox series

[-next] Bluetooth: RFCOMM: Use DEVICE_ATTR_RO macro

Message ID 20210520133235.32244-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [-next] Bluetooth: RFCOMM: Use DEVICE_ATTR_RO macro | expand

Commit Message

Yue Haibing May 20, 2021, 1:32 p.m. UTC
Use DEVICE_ATTR_RO helper instead of plain DEVICE_ATTR,
which makes the code a bit shorter and easier to read.

Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
---
 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

bluez.test.bot@gmail.com May 20, 2021, 2:20 p.m. UTC | #1
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=485799

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    PASS      0.76 seconds
GitLint                       PASS      0.13 seconds
BuildKernel                   PASS      619.14 seconds
TestRunner: Setup             PASS      407.54 seconds
TestRunner: l2cap-tester      PASS      2.93 seconds
TestRunner: bnep-tester       PASS      2.08 seconds
TestRunner: mgmt-tester       PASS      27.63 seconds
TestRunner: rfcomm-tester     PASS      2.29 seconds
TestRunner: sco-tester        PASS      2.26 seconds
TestRunner: smp-tester        PASS      2.41 seconds
TestRunner: userchan-tester   PASS      2.11 seconds

Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - PASS - 0.76 seconds
Run checkpatch.pl script with rule in .checkpatch.conf


##############################
Test: GitLint - PASS - 0.13 seconds
Run gitlint with rule in .gitlint


##############################
Test: BuildKernel - PASS - 619.14 seconds
Build Kernel with minimal configuration supports Bluetooth


##############################
Test: TestRunner: Setup - PASS - 407.54 seconds
Setup environment for running Test Runner


##############################
Test: TestRunner: l2cap-tester - PASS - 2.93 seconds
Run test-runner with l2cap-tester
Total: 40, Passed: 40 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: bnep-tester - PASS - 2.08 seconds
Run test-runner with bnep-tester
Total: 1, Passed: 1 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: mgmt-tester - PASS - 27.63 seconds
Run test-runner with mgmt-tester
Total: 416, Passed: 403 (96.9%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 13

##############################
Test: TestRunner: rfcomm-tester - PASS - 2.29 seconds
Run test-runner with rfcomm-tester
Total: 9, Passed: 9 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: sco-tester - PASS - 2.26 seconds
Run test-runner with sco-tester
Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: smp-tester - PASS - 2.41 seconds
Run test-runner with smp-tester
Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

##############################
Test: TestRunner: userchan-tester - PASS - 2.11 seconds
Run test-runner with userchan-tester
Total: 3, Passed: 3 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0



---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
Marcel Holtmann May 20, 2021, 3:25 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi YueHaibing,

> Use DEVICE_ATTR_RO helper instead of plain DEVICE_ATTR,
> which makes the code a bit shorter and easier to read.
> 
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.

Regards

Marcel
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c
index c76dcc0f679b..4e095746e002 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c
@@ -198,20 +198,22 @@  static void rfcomm_reparent_device(struct rfcomm_dev *dev)
 	hci_dev_put(hdev);
 }
 
-static ssize_t show_address(struct device *tty_dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+static ssize_t address_show(struct device *tty_dev,
+			    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
 	struct rfcomm_dev *dev = dev_get_drvdata(tty_dev);
 	return sprintf(buf, "%pMR\n", &dev->dst);
 }
 
-static ssize_t show_channel(struct device *tty_dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+static ssize_t channel_show(struct device *tty_dev,
+			    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
 	struct rfcomm_dev *dev = dev_get_drvdata(tty_dev);
 	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", dev->channel);
 }
 
-static DEVICE_ATTR(address, 0444, show_address, NULL);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(channel, 0444, show_channel, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(address);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(channel);
 
 static struct rfcomm_dev *__rfcomm_dev_add(struct rfcomm_dev_req *req,
 					   struct rfcomm_dlc *dlc)