diff mbox series

[v5] Bluetooth: btusb: Add MediaTek MT7925-B22M support ID 0x13d3:0x3604

Message ID 20240730220824.224298-3-bearodark@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit bd0b4dae74b0f0ee9ea37818e1c132b56a26d6dd
Headers show
Series [v5] Bluetooth: btusb: Add MediaTek MT7925-B22M support ID 0x13d3:0x3604 | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
tedd_an/pre-ci_am success Success
tedd_an/CheckPatch success CheckPatch PASS
tedd_an/GitLint success Gitlint PASS
tedd_an/SubjectPrefix success Gitlint PASS
tedd_an/BuildKernel success BuildKernel PASS
tedd_an/CheckAllWarning success CheckAllWarning PASS
tedd_an/CheckSparse success CheckSparse PASS
tedd_an/CheckSmatch success CheckSparse PASS
tedd_an/BuildKernel32 success BuildKernel32 PASS
tedd_an/TestRunnerSetup success TestRunnerSetup PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_l2cap-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_iso-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_bnep-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_mgmt-tester fail TestRunner_mgmt-tester: Total: 492, Passed: 489 (99.4%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 2
tedd_an/TestRunner_rfcomm-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_sco-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_ioctl-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_mesh-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_smp-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/TestRunner_userchan-tester success TestRunner PASS
tedd_an/IncrementalBuild success Incremental Build PASS

Commit Message

Alex Hall July 30, 2024, 10:08 p.m. UTC
This patch fixes bluetooth support on the MediaTek MT7925 WiFi 7 +
BT 5.3 M.2 chipset that I purchased from aliexpress (and which
arrived today). The PCB states that it is an MT7925B22M.

Device from /sys/kernel/debug/usb/devices:

T:  Bus=03 Lev=02 Prnt=03 Port=02 Cnt=01 Dev#=  4 Spd=480  MxCh= 0
D:  Ver= 2.10 Cls=ef(misc ) Sub=02 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor=13d3 ProdID=3604 Rev= 1.00
S:  Manufacturer=MediaTek Inc.
S:  Product=Wireless_Device
S:  SerialNumber=000000000
C:* #Ifs= 3 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr=100mA
A:  FirstIf#= 0 IfCount= 3 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01
I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=  16 Ivl=125us
E:  Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
E:  Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
I:* If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=   0 Ivl=1ms
E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=   0 Ivl=1ms
I:  If#= 1 Alt= 1 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=   9 Ivl=1ms
E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=   9 Ivl=1ms
I:  If#= 1 Alt= 2 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  17 Ivl=1ms
E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  17 Ivl=1ms
I:  If#= 1 Alt= 3 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  25 Ivl=1ms
E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  25 Ivl=1ms
I:  If#= 1 Alt= 4 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  33 Ivl=1ms
E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  33 Ivl=1ms
I:  If#= 1 Alt= 5 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  49 Ivl=1ms
E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  49 Ivl=1ms
I:  If#= 1 Alt= 6 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  63 Ivl=1ms
E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  63 Ivl=1ms
I:* If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
E:  Ad=8a(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=  64 Ivl=125us
E:  Ad=0a(O) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=  64 Ivl=125us
I:  If#= 2 Alt= 1 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
E:  Ad=8a(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 512 Ivl=125us
E:  Ad=0a(O) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 512 Ivl=125us

High fidelity images I took of the chip itself for future reference:
https://archive.org/details/MediaTek-MT7925B22M/

Webpage the chip was purchased from, note it is different from the
images taken:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240620021119/https://www.aliexpress.
us/item/3256806821207897.html

Signed-off-by: Alexander Hall <bearodark@gmail.com>
---
Changes from v1:
It was suggested that the (now removed) aliexpress link be run through
  archive.org, however aliexpress is incompatible with waybacks
  scraping tool, and as an alternative I have taken high resolution
  images of the actual chip I received and put them on archive.org.
The prefix of this patch was changed to `Bluetooth:` as suggested
Maintainers and open lists have been auto CC'd as suggested, via
  get_maintainers.pl
Changes from v2:
  the commit name has been updated to include the device:vendor id to be
  clearer
  web archive eventually came through so I have readded the link to that
  aswell
Changes from v3:
  tabs replaced with spaces, Signed-off-by now matches From sender
Changes from v4:
  remove trailing whitespace that gitlint failed on


 drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Comments

bluez.test.bot@gmail.com July 30, 2024, 10:33 p.m. UTC | #1
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=875239

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    PASS      0.60 seconds
GitLint                       PASS      0.28 seconds
SubjectPrefix                 PASS      0.10 seconds
BuildKernel                   PASS      30.26 seconds
CheckAllWarning               PASS      32.87 seconds
CheckSparse                   PASS      38.26 seconds
CheckSmatch                   PASS      103.58 seconds
BuildKernel32                 PASS      29.18 seconds
TestRunnerSetup               PASS      532.97 seconds
TestRunner_l2cap-tester       PASS      24.24 seconds
TestRunner_iso-tester         PASS      37.44 seconds
TestRunner_bnep-tester        PASS      5.00 seconds
TestRunner_mgmt-tester        FAIL      110.67 seconds
TestRunner_rfcomm-tester      PASS      7.70 seconds
TestRunner_sco-tester         PASS      15.18 seconds
TestRunner_ioctl-tester       PASS      8.14 seconds
TestRunner_mesh-tester        PASS      6.16 seconds
TestRunner_smp-tester         PASS      7.12 seconds
TestRunner_userchan-tester    PASS      5.19 seconds
IncrementalBuild              PASS      28.22 seconds

Details
##############################
Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL
Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner
Output:
Total: 492, Passed: 489 (99.4%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 2

Failed Test Cases
LL Privacy - Start Discovery 2 (Disable RL)          Failed       0.175 seconds


---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
Alex Hall July 31, 2024, 2:50 a.m. UTC | #2
I'm confused on why TestRunner_mgmt-tester is now failing, it seems to 
be a test on the

patch itself (and on v3 of this patch it did not fail, which has an 
identical codechange).

I do not wish to resend an identical patch and waste CI time if there is 
indeed something wrong with the patch,

but I would like to be advised if this is a spurious/unrelated failure, 
and if so should I resend the patch? or is there a mechanism to rerun 
these tests

On 7/30/24 3:33 PM, bluez.test.bot@gmail.com wrote:
> This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
>
> Dear submitter,
>
> Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
> This is a CI test results with your patch series:
> PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=875239
>
> ---Test result---
>
> Test Summary:
> CheckPatch                    PASS      0.60 seconds
> GitLint                       PASS      0.28 seconds
> SubjectPrefix                 PASS      0.10 seconds
> BuildKernel                   PASS      30.26 seconds
> CheckAllWarning               PASS      32.87 seconds
> CheckSparse                   PASS      38.26 seconds
> CheckSmatch                   PASS      103.58 seconds
> BuildKernel32                 PASS      29.18 seconds
> TestRunnerSetup               PASS      532.97 seconds
> TestRunner_l2cap-tester       PASS      24.24 seconds
> TestRunner_iso-tester         PASS      37.44 seconds
> TestRunner_bnep-tester        PASS      5.00 seconds
> TestRunner_mgmt-tester        FAIL      110.67 seconds
> TestRunner_rfcomm-tester      PASS      7.70 seconds
> TestRunner_sco-tester         PASS      15.18 seconds
> TestRunner_ioctl-tester       PASS      8.14 seconds
> TestRunner_mesh-tester        PASS      6.16 seconds
> TestRunner_smp-tester         PASS      7.12 seconds
> TestRunner_userchan-tester    PASS      5.19 seconds
> IncrementalBuild              PASS      28.22 seconds
>
> Details
> ##############################
> Test: TestRunner_mgmt-tester - FAIL
> Desc: Run mgmt-tester with test-runner
> Output:
> Total: 492, Passed: 489 (99.4%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 2
>
> Failed Test Cases
> LL Privacy - Start Discovery 2 (Disable RL)          Failed       0.175 seconds
>
>
> ---
> Regards,
> Linux Bluetooth
>
patchwork-bot+bluetooth@kernel.org Aug. 6, 2024, 8:28 p.m. UTC | #3
Hello:

This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master)
by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>:

On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:08:25 -0700 you wrote:
> This patch fixes bluetooth support on the MediaTek MT7925 WiFi 7 +
> BT 5.3 M.2 chipset that I purchased from aliexpress (and which
> arrived today). The PCB states that it is an MT7925B22M.
> 
> Device from /sys/kernel/debug/usb/devices:
> 
> T:  Bus=03 Lev=02 Prnt=03 Port=02 Cnt=01 Dev#=  4 Spd=480  MxCh= 0
> D:  Ver= 2.10 Cls=ef(misc ) Sub=02 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs=  1
> P:  Vendor=13d3 ProdID=3604 Rev= 1.00
> S:  Manufacturer=MediaTek Inc.
> S:  Product=Wireless_Device
> S:  SerialNumber=000000000
> C:* #Ifs= 3 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr=100mA
> A:  FirstIf#= 0 IfCount= 3 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01
> I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
> E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=  16 Ivl=125us
> E:  Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> E:  Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> I:* If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
> E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=   0 Ivl=1ms
> E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=   0 Ivl=1ms
> I:  If#= 1 Alt= 1 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
> E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=   9 Ivl=1ms
> E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=   9 Ivl=1ms
> I:  If#= 1 Alt= 2 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
> E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  17 Ivl=1ms
> E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  17 Ivl=1ms
> I:  If#= 1 Alt= 3 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
> E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  25 Ivl=1ms
> E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  25 Ivl=1ms
> I:  If#= 1 Alt= 4 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
> E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  33 Ivl=1ms
> E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  33 Ivl=1ms
> I:  If#= 1 Alt= 5 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
> E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  49 Ivl=1ms
> E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  49 Ivl=1ms
> I:  If#= 1 Alt= 6 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb
> E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  63 Ivl=1ms
> E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS=  63 Ivl=1ms
> I:* If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
> E:  Ad=8a(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=  64 Ivl=125us
> E:  Ad=0a(O) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=  64 Ivl=125us
> I:  If#= 2 Alt= 1 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(wlcon) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none)
> E:  Ad=8a(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 512 Ivl=125us
> E:  Ad=0a(O) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 512 Ivl=125us
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v5] Bluetooth: btusb: Add MediaTek MT7925-B22M support ID 0x13d3:0x3604
    https://git.kernel.org/bluetooth/bluetooth-next/c/bd0b4dae74b0

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
index e384ef6ff..2ea46a0e6 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
@@ -691,6 +691,9 @@  static const struct usb_device_id quirks_table[] = {
 	{ USB_DEVICE(0x13d3, 0x3603), .driver_info = BTUSB_MEDIATEK |
 						     BTUSB_WIDEBAND_SPEECH |
 						     BTUSB_VALID_LE_STATES },
+	{ USB_DEVICE(0x13d3, 0x3604), .driver_info = BTUSB_MEDIATEK |
+						     BTUSB_WIDEBAND_SPEECH |
+						     BTUSB_VALID_LE_STATES },
 
 	/* Additional Realtek 8723AE Bluetooth devices */
 	{ USB_DEVICE(0x0930, 0x021d), .driver_info = BTUSB_REALTEK },