From patchwork Wed Sep 15 13:26:56 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jeff Layton X-Patchwork-Id: 12496299 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B88C4332F for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50FC610FF for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233802AbhION2T (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:28:19 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37274 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233612AbhION2S (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:28:18 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3904C61247; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:26:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1631712419; bh=JqinzSvxFEOcqMrRbSmB935l22a2vBjFqpWuWEHBfWw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SgycvFKIXgsl2qm1pAxlbBVH6/RhS8mf/L48zkH7uuP4eW/RWR/4XjCwLVpICrEm8 NDEZTFBPs7vZkecTarZPLJjARNpLYmqXsp6+13umlVQrSWPQVcFsz0z/dnCmaBzqC/ Yj4gyhUvfhXi0qzb52Qa/iOhjBb3RJZCRi5yfGxv+XYubYsMmjD2e/WKX5A2UAUmSl HwXor+Dt/vHLI3Q8/8tqtZlVJDYNYW6YnbhbrWb6yI0ekVYxpKXz32zq9HSpmPcyya 1ZFYL11PVhg0K3/sDcBZySHNrVxUzMbKKVJ3DgNsnATGutip5z1Aw9bU5Dx8+zZ25X J3wXuyOrE/voA== From: Jeff Layton To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: idryomov@gmail.com, mnelson@redhat.com Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/2] libceph: allow tasks to submit messages without taking con->mutex Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:26:56 -0400 Message-Id: <20210915132656.30347-3-jlayton@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210915132656.30347-1-jlayton@kernel.org> References: <20210915132656.30347-1-jlayton@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Currently, the out_queue is protected by the con->mutex. ceph_con_send takes the mutex but just does some in-memory operations, followed by kicking the workqueue job to do the actual send. This means that while the workqueue job is operating, any task that wants to send a new message will end up blocked. Given that none of ceph_con_send's operations aside from the mutex acquisition will block, we should be able to allow tasks to submit new messages under a spinlock rather than taking the mutex, which should reduce this contention and (hopefully) improve throughput for both cephfs and rbd in highly contended situations. Add a new spinlock to protect the out_queue, and ensure we take it while holding the con->mutex when accessing the out_queue. Stop taking the con->mutex in ceph_con_send, and instead just take the spinlock around the list_add to the out_queue. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- include/linux/ceph/messenger.h | 1 + net/ceph/messenger.c | 16 +++++++++++----- net/ceph/messenger_v1.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++----------------- net/ceph/messenger_v2.c | 5 +++++ 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h b/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h index 0a455b05f17e..155dd8a8e8ce 100644 --- a/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h +++ b/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h @@ -448,6 +448,7 @@ struct ceph_connection { struct mutex mutex; /* out queue */ + spinlock_t out_queue_lock; /* protects out_queue */ struct list_head out_queue; struct list_head out_sent; /* sending or sent but unacked */ u64 out_seq; /* last message queued for send */ diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger.c b/net/ceph/messenger.c index d14ff578cace..b539d3359ef4 100644 --- a/net/ceph/messenger.c +++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c @@ -633,6 +633,7 @@ void ceph_con_init(struct ceph_connection *con, void *private, con_sock_state_init(con); mutex_init(&con->mutex); + spin_lock_init(&con->out_queue_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&con->out_queue); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&con->out_sent); INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&con->work, ceph_con_workfn); @@ -691,6 +692,7 @@ void ceph_con_discard_requeued(struct ceph_connection *con, u64 reconnect_seq) u64 seq; dout("%s con %p reconnect_seq %llu\n", __func__, con, reconnect_seq); + spin_lock(&con->out_queue_lock); while (!list_empty(&con->out_queue)) { msg = list_first_entry(&con->out_queue, struct ceph_msg, list_head); @@ -704,6 +706,7 @@ void ceph_con_discard_requeued(struct ceph_connection *con, u64 reconnect_seq) msg, seq); ceph_msg_remove(msg); } + spin_unlock(&con->out_queue_lock); } #ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK @@ -1601,16 +1604,19 @@ static void con_fault(struct ceph_connection *con) } /* Requeue anything that hasn't been acked */ + spin_lock(&con->out_queue_lock); list_splice_init(&con->out_sent, &con->out_queue); /* If there are no messages queued or keepalive pending, place * the connection in a STANDBY state */ if (list_empty(&con->out_queue) && !ceph_con_flag_test(con, CEPH_CON_F_KEEPALIVE_PENDING)) { + spin_unlock(&con->out_queue_lock); dout("fault %p setting STANDBY clearing WRITE_PENDING\n", con); ceph_con_flag_clear(con, CEPH_CON_F_WRITE_PENDING); con->state = CEPH_CON_S_STANDBY; } else { + spin_unlock(&con->out_queue_lock); /* retry after a delay. */ con->state = CEPH_CON_S_PREOPEN; if (!con->delay) { @@ -1691,19 +1697,18 @@ void ceph_con_send(struct ceph_connection *con, struct ceph_msg *msg) BUG_ON(msg->front.iov_len != le32_to_cpu(msg->hdr.front_len)); msg->needs_out_seq = true; - mutex_lock(&con->mutex); - - if (con->state == CEPH_CON_S_CLOSED) { + if (READ_ONCE(con->state) == CEPH_CON_S_CLOSED) { dout("con_send %p closed, dropping %p\n", con, msg); ceph_msg_put(msg); - mutex_unlock(&con->mutex); return; } msg_con_set(msg, con); BUG_ON(!list_empty(&msg->list_head)); + spin_lock(&con->out_queue_lock); list_add_tail(&msg->list_head, &con->out_queue); + spin_unlock(&con->out_queue_lock); dout("----- %p to %s%lld %d=%s len %d+%d+%d -----\n", msg, ENTITY_NAME(con->peer_name), le16_to_cpu(msg->hdr.type), ceph_msg_type_name(le16_to_cpu(msg->hdr.type)), @@ -1712,7 +1717,6 @@ void ceph_con_send(struct ceph_connection *con, struct ceph_msg *msg) le32_to_cpu(msg->hdr.data_len)); ceph_con_flag_set(con, CEPH_CON_F_CLEAR_STANDBY); - mutex_unlock(&con->mutex); /* if there wasn't anything waiting to send before, queue * new work */ @@ -2058,6 +2062,8 @@ void ceph_con_get_out_msg(struct ceph_connection *con) { struct ceph_msg *msg; + lockdep_assert_held(&con->out_queue_lock); + BUG_ON(list_empty(&con->out_queue)); msg = list_first_entry(&con->out_queue, struct ceph_msg, list_head); WARN_ON(msg->con != con); diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger_v1.c b/net/ceph/messenger_v1.c index 2cb5ffdf071a..db864be73b60 100644 --- a/net/ceph/messenger_v1.c +++ b/net/ceph/messenger_v1.c @@ -194,25 +194,9 @@ static void prepare_write_message_footer(struct ceph_connection *con) */ static void prepare_write_message(struct ceph_connection *con) { - struct ceph_msg *m; + struct ceph_msg *m = con->out_msg; u32 crc; - con_out_kvec_reset(con); - con->v1.out_msg_done = false; - - /* Sneak an ack in there first? If we can get it into the same - * TCP packet that's a good thing. */ - if (con->in_seq > con->in_seq_acked) { - con->in_seq_acked = con->in_seq; - con_out_kvec_add(con, sizeof (tag_ack), &tag_ack); - con->v1.out_temp_ack = cpu_to_le64(con->in_seq_acked); - con_out_kvec_add(con, sizeof(con->v1.out_temp_ack), - &con->v1.out_temp_ack); - } - - ceph_con_get_out_msg(con); - m = con->out_msg; - dout("prepare_write_message %p seq %lld type %d len %d+%d+%zd\n", m, con->out_seq, le16_to_cpu(m->hdr.type), le32_to_cpu(m->hdr.front_len), le32_to_cpu(m->hdr.middle_len), @@ -1427,10 +1411,27 @@ int ceph_con_v1_try_write(struct ceph_connection *con) goto more; } /* is anything else pending? */ + spin_lock(&con->out_queue_lock); if (!list_empty(&con->out_queue)) { + con_out_kvec_reset(con); + con->v1.out_msg_done = false; + + /* Sneak an ack in there first? If we can get it into the same + * TCP packet that's a good thing. */ + if (con->in_seq > con->in_seq_acked) { + con->in_seq_acked = con->in_seq; + con_out_kvec_add(con, sizeof (tag_ack), &tag_ack); + con->v1.out_temp_ack = cpu_to_le64(con->in_seq_acked); + con_out_kvec_add(con, sizeof(con->v1.out_temp_ack), + &con->v1.out_temp_ack); + } + + ceph_con_get_out_msg(con); + spin_unlock(&con->out_queue_lock); prepare_write_message(con); goto more; } + spin_unlock(&con->out_queue_lock); if (con->in_seq > con->in_seq_acked) { prepare_write_ack(con); goto more; diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c b/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c index cc40ce4e02fb..1a1c2c282120 100644 --- a/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c +++ b/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c @@ -3001,7 +3001,9 @@ static int populate_out_iter(struct ceph_connection *con) } WARN_ON(con->v2.out_state != OUT_S_GET_NEXT); + spin_lock(&con->out_queue_lock); if (ceph_con_flag_test_and_clear(con, CEPH_CON_F_KEEPALIVE_PENDING)) { + spin_unlock(&con->out_queue_lock); ret = prepare_keepalive2(con); if (ret) { pr_err("prepare_keepalive2 failed: %d\n", ret); @@ -3009,18 +3011,21 @@ static int populate_out_iter(struct ceph_connection *con) } } else if (!list_empty(&con->out_queue)) { ceph_con_get_out_msg(con); + spin_unlock(&con->out_queue_lock); ret = prepare_message(con); if (ret) { pr_err("prepare_message failed: %d\n", ret); return ret; } } else if (con->in_seq > con->in_seq_acked) { + spin_unlock(&con->out_queue_lock); ret = prepare_ack(con); if (ret) { pr_err("prepare_ack failed: %d\n", ret); return ret; } } else { + spin_unlock(&con->out_queue_lock); goto nothing_pending; }