Message ID | 20221130131245.v8.1.If7926fcbad397bc6990dd725690229bed403948c@changeid (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [v8,1/3] platform/chrome: cros_ec_uart: Add cros-ec-uart transport layer | expand |
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 01:12:54PM -0700, Mark Hasemeyer wrote: > This patch does following: > 1. Adds a new cros-ec-uart driver. This driver can send EC requests on > UART and process response packets received on UART transport. [...] > > Signed-off-by: Bhanu Prakash Maiya <bhanumaiya@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@chromium.org> Overall the series looks good to me. I would defer it for a while for people in the mailing list to review and queue it for next next merge window (i.e. for 6.3). > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 2585e7edc3358..8ed08316fd11e 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -4918,6 +4918,13 @@ S: Maintained > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/google,cros-ec-codec.yaml > F: sound/soc/codecs/cros_ec_codec.* > > +CHROMEOS EC UART DRIVER > +M: Bhanu Prakash Maiya <bhanumaiya@chromium.org> > +R: Benson Leung <bleung@google.com> Looking around the MAINTAINERS file, I am not sure if Benson would prefer to use chromium.org account.
Hi, On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 12:13 PM Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@chromium.org> wrote: > > This patch does following: > 1. Adds a new cros-ec-uart driver. This driver can send EC requests on > UART and process response packets received on UART transport. > 2. Once probed, this driver will initialize the serdev device based on > the underlying information in the ACPI resource. After serdev device > properties are set, this driver will register itself cros-ec. > 3. High level driver can use this implementation to talk to ChromeOS > Embedded Controller device in case it supports UART as transport. > 4. When cros-ec driver initiates a request packet, outgoing message is > processed in buffer and sent via serdev. Once bytes are sent, driver > enables a wait_queue. > 5. Since ChromeOS EC device sends response asynchronously, AP's TTY > driver accumulates response bytes and calls the registered callback. > TTY driver can send multiple callback for bytes ranging from 1 to MAX > bytes supported by EC device. > 6. Driver waits for EC_MSG_DEADLINE_MS to collect and process received > bytes. It wakes wait_queue if expected bytes are received or else > wait_queue timeout. Based on the error condition, driver returns > data_len or error to cros_ec. > > Signed-off-by: Bhanu Prakash Maiya <bhanumaiya@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@chromium.org> > --- > > Changes in v8: > - Combine for loops used for xsum calculation > - Use ec_dev->dev instead of serdev->dev > - Sort includes > - Swap struct var order to match doc order > - fix whitespace > - Update contact information in MAINTAINERS > - Update copyright date > > Changes in v7: > - Use ACPI ID matching > - Change MODULE_LICENSE from GPL v2 to GPL > > Changes in v6: > - Tuning EC_MSG_DEADLINE_MS from 1 sec to 500 msec. Since the EC's UART > response buffer was tuned and redeuced to 256 byte, 500 msec timeout > should give enough time for 256 bytes to be recieved from SoC UART > buffer. > > Changes in v5: > - Fixed checkpatch.pl warnings. > > Changes in v4: > - Change EC_MSG_DEADLINE_MS from 3 secs to 1 sec. 3 secs timeout prevents > driver from intercepting EC in RO stage. In case of request failure, 1 > sec allows driver to retry and send HC when EC is in RO. > - Add more information in commit message. > > Changes in v3: > - checkpatch.pl script warns about char len 80 even though we have > relaxed view guideline for line below 100 chars. Currently sticking > with 80 chars in v3. > - Fixed style issues > > Changes in v2: > - Fixed build error on v1. > - Changed EC timeout for response packet to 3 Sec and added comments. > - Fixed cros_ec_uart_rx_bytes function to handle rx buffer < size of response header. > > --- > MAINTAINERS | 7 + > drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig | 10 + > drivers/platform/chrome/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_uart.c | 411 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 429 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_uart.c > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 2585e7edc3358..8ed08316fd11e 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -4918,6 +4918,13 @@ S: Maintained > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/google,cros-ec-codec.yaml > F: sound/soc/codecs/cros_ec_codec.* > > +CHROMEOS EC UART DRIVER > +M: Bhanu Prakash Maiya <bhanumaiya@chromium.org> > +R: Benson Leung <bleung@google.com> > +R: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> > +S: Maintained > +F: drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_uart.c > + > CHROMEOS EC SUBDRIVERS > M: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org> > R: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig > index 6b954c5acadb1..d4a95ec261ed3 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig > @@ -119,6 +119,16 @@ config CROS_EC_SPI > response time cannot be guaranteed, we support ignoring > 'pre-amble' bytes before the response actually starts. > > +config CROS_EC_UART > + tristate "ChromeOS Embedded Controller (UART)" > + depends on CROS_EC && ACPI && SERIAL_DEV_BUS > + help > + If you say Y here, you get support for talking to the ChromeOS EC > + through a UART, using a byte-level protocol. > + > + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the > + module will be called cros_ec_uart. > + > config CROS_EC_LPC > tristate "ChromeOS Embedded Controller (LPC)" > depends on CROS_EC && ACPI && (X86 || COMPILE_TEST) > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/Makefile b/drivers/platform/chrome/Makefile > index 2950610101f15..6f5b6f01940db 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/Makefile > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_EC_ISHTP) += cros_ec_ishtp.o > obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_TYPEC_SWITCH) += cros_typec_switch.o > obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_EC_RPMSG) += cros_ec_rpmsg.o > obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_EC_SPI) += cros_ec_spi.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_EC_UART) += cros_ec_uart.o > cros_ec_lpcs-objs := cros_ec_lpc.o cros_ec_lpc_mec.o > obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_EC_TYPEC) += cros_ec_typec.o > obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_EC_LPC) += cros_ec_lpcs.o > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_uart.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_uart.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000000..ef9ac7ace04b6 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_uart.c > @@ -0,0 +1,411 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > +/* > + * UART interface for ChromeOS Embedded Controller > + * > + * Copyright 2020-2022 Google LLC. > + */ > + > +#include <linux/acpi.h> > +#include <linux/delay.h> > +#include <linux/errno.h> > +#include <linux/init.h> > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h> > +#include <linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h> > +#include <linux/serdev.h> > +#include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <uapi/linux/sched/types.h> > + > +#include "cros_ec.h" > + > +/* > + * EC sends contiguous bytes of response packet on UART AP RX. > + * TTY driver in AP accumulates incoming bytes and calls the registered callback > + * function. Byte count can range from 1 to MAX bytes supported by EC. > + * This driver should wait for long time for all callbacks to be processed. > + * Considering the worst case scenario, wait for 500 msec. This timeout should > + * account for max latency and some additional guard time. > + * Best case: Entire packet is received in ~200 ms, wait queue will be released > + * and packet will be processed. > + * Worst case: TTY driver sends bytes in multiple callbacks. In this case this > + * driver will wait for ~1 sec beyond which it will timeout. > + * This timeout value should not exceed ~500 msec because in case if > + * EC_CMD_REBOOT_EC sent, high level driver should be able to intercept EC > + * in RO. > + */ > +#define EC_MSG_DEADLINE_MS 500 > + > +/** > + * struct response_info - Encapsulate EC response related > + * information for passing between function > + * cros_ec_uart_pkt_xfer() and cros_ec_uart_rx_bytes() > + * callback. > + * @data: Copy the data received from EC here. > + * @max_size: Max size allocated for the @data buffer. If the > + * received data exceeds this value, we log an error. > + * @size: Actual size of data received from EC. This is also > + * used to accumulate byte count with response is received > + * in dma chunks. > + * @exp_len: Expected bytes of response from EC including header. > + * @error: 0 for success, negative error code for a failure. > + * @received: Set to true on receiving a valid EC response. > + * @wait_queue: Wait queue EC response where the cros_ec sends request > + * to EC and waits > + */ > +struct response_info { > + void *data; > + size_t max_size; > + size_t size; > + size_t exp_len; > + int error; > + bool received; > + wait_queue_head_t wait_queue; > +}; > + > +/** > + * struct cros_ec_uart - information about a uart-connected EC > + * > + * @serdev_device: serdev uart device we are connected to. > + * @baudrate: UART baudrate of attached EC device. > + * @flowcontrol: UART flowcontrol of attached device. > + * @irq: Linux IRQ number of associated serial device. > + * @response: Response info passing between cros_ec_uart_pkt_xfer() > + * and cros_ec_uart_rx_bytes() > + */ > +struct cros_ec_uart { > + struct serdev_device *serdev; > + u32 baudrate; > + u8 flowcontrol; > + u32 irq; > + struct response_info response; > +}; > + > +static int cros_ec_uart_rx_bytes(struct serdev_device *serdev, > + const u8 *data, > + size_t count) > +{ > + struct ec_host_response *response; > + struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(serdev); > + struct cros_ec_uart *ec_uart = ec_dev->priv; > + > + /* Check if bytes were sent out of band */ > + if (!ec_uart->response.data) > + /* Discard all bytes */ > + return count; > + > + /* > + * Check if incoming bytes + response.size are less than allocated > + * buffer in din by cros_ec. This will ensure that if EC sends more > + * bytes than max_size, waiting process will be notified with an error. > + */ Please try to avoid over-commenting (here and elsewhere in the file) [1]; it shouldn't be necessary to comment every block of code, where the intention can be surmised purely by looking at the code. > + if (ec_uart->response.size + count <= ec_uart->response.max_size) { > + /* Copy bytes in data in buffer */ This comment seems unnecessary. > + memcpy((void *)ec_uart->response.data + ec_uart->response.size, > + (void *)data, count); > + > + /* Add incoming bytes in size */ > + ec_uart->response.size += count; > + > + /* > + * Read data_len if we received response header and if exp_len > + * was not read before. > + */ > + if (ec_uart->response.size >= sizeof(*response) && > + ec_uart->response.exp_len == 0) { > + /* Get expected response length from response header */ > + response = (struct ec_host_response *) > + ec_uart->response.data; > + > + ec_uart->response.exp_len = response->data_len + > + sizeof(*response); > + } > + > + /* > + * If driver received response header and payload from EC, > + * Wake up the wait queue. > + */ > + if (ec_uart->response.size >= sizeof(*response) && > + ec_uart->response.size == ec_uart->response.exp_len) { > + /* Set flag before waking up the caller */ > + ec_uart->response.received = true; > + > + /* Wake the calling thread */ > + wake_up_interruptible(&ec_uart->response.wait_queue); > + } You can save 1 level of indentation by inverting the if block and making it a guard clause: if (ec_uart->response_size + count > ec_uart->response_max_size) { ec_uart->response.error = -EMSGSIZE; wake_up_interruptible(...); return; } memcpy(...); ec_uart->response.size += count; > + } else { > + /* Received bytes are more the allocated buffer*/ > + ec_uart->response.error = -EMSGSIZE; > + > + /* Wake the calling thread */ Same issue as earlier. There is no need to add a comment for single lines like these where what is happening is obvious. > + wake_up_interruptible(&ec_uart->response.wait_queue); > + } > + > + return count; > +} > + > +static int cros_ec_uart_pkt_xfer(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > + struct cros_ec_command *ec_msg) > +{ > + struct cros_ec_uart *ec_uart = ec_dev->priv; > + struct serdev_device *serdev = ec_uart->serdev; > + struct ec_host_response *response; > + unsigned int len; > + int ret, i; > + u8 sum = 0; > + > + /* Prepare an outgoing message in the output buffer */ Superfluous comment. > + len = cros_ec_prepare_tx(ec_dev, ec_msg); > + dev_dbg(ec_dev->dev, "Prepared len=%d\n", len); > + > + /* Setup for incoming response */ > + ec_uart->response.data = ec_dev->din; > + ec_uart->response.max_size = ec_dev->din_size; > + ec_uart->response.size = 0; > + ec_uart->response.error = 0; > + ec_uart->response.exp_len = 0; > + ec_uart->response.received = false; > + > + /* Write serial device buffer */ Superfluous comment. > + ret = serdev_device_write_buf(serdev, ec_dev->dout, len); > + if (ret < len) { > + dev_err(ec_dev->dev, "Unable to write data"); > + > + /* Return EIO as controller had issues writing buffer */ > + ret = -EIO; > + goto exit; > + } > + > + /* Once request is successfully sent to EC, wait to wait_queue */ > + wait_event_interruptible_timeout(ec_uart->response.wait_queue, > + ec_uart->response.received, > + msecs_to_jiffies(EC_MSG_DEADLINE_MS)); wait_event_interruptible_timeout() returns a value indicating if a timeout occurred and/or if the condition evaluated to true[3]. Can that not be used here, instead of re-writing the timeout/error check mechanism? > + > + /* Check if wait_queue was interrupted due to an error */ > + if (ec_uart->response.error < 0) { > + dev_warn(ec_dev->dev, "Response error detected.\n"); > + > + ret = ec_uart->response.error; > + goto exit; > + } > + > + /* Check if valid response was received or there was a timeout */ > + if (!ec_uart->response.received) { > + dev_warn(ec_dev->dev, "EC failed to respond in time.\n"); > + > + ret = -ETIMEDOUT; > + goto exit; > + } > + > + /* Check response error code */ > + response = (struct ec_host_response *)ec_dev->din; > + ec_msg->result = response->result; > + > + /* Check if received response is longer than expected */ > + if (response->data_len > ec_msg->insize) { > + dev_err(ec_dev->dev, "Resp too long (%d bytes, expected %d)", > + response->data_len, > + ec_msg->insize); > + ret = -ENOSPC; > + goto exit; > + } > + > + /* Validate checksum */ > + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*response) + response->data_len; i++) > + sum += ec_dev->din[i]; > + > + if (sum) { > + dev_err(ec_dev->dev, > + "Bad packet checksum calculated %x\n", > + sum); Line length allowances are 100 chars now [2]. I think this should fit on 1 line. > + ret = -EBADMSG; > + goto exit; > + } > + > + /* Copy response packet to ec_msg data buffer */ Superfluous comment. > + memcpy(ec_msg->data, > + ec_dev->din + sizeof(*response), > + response->data_len); > + > + /* Return data_len to cros_ec */ > + ret = response->data_len; > + > +exit: > + /* Reset ec_uart */ > + ec_uart->response.data = NULL; > + ec_uart->response.max_size = 0; > + ec_uart->response.size = 0; > + ec_uart->response.error = 0; > + ec_uart->response.exp_len = 0; > + ec_uart->response.received = false; Sorry if I'm missing something, but are you expecting some other access to these variables (before the next call to cros_ec_uart_pkt_xfer()) ? If not, we shouldn't need to reset everything here (re-initializing it on the next call to cros_ec_uart_pkt_xfer() should be sufficient) > + > + if (ec_msg->command == EC_CMD_REBOOT_EC) > + msleep(EC_REBOOT_DELAY_MS); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int cros_ec_uart_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data) > +{ > + struct cros_ec_uart *ec_uart = data; > + struct acpi_resource_uart_serialbus *sb; > + > + switch (ares->type) { > + case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS: > + sb = &ares->data.uart_serial_bus; > + if (sb->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_SERIAL_TYPE_UART) { > + ec_uart->baudrate = sb->default_baud_rate; > + dev_dbg(&ec_uart->serdev->dev, "Baudrate %d\n", > + ec_uart->baudrate); > + > + ec_uart->flowcontrol = sb->flow_control; > + dev_dbg(&ec_uart->serdev->dev, "Flow control %d\n", > + ec_uart->flowcontrol); > + } > + break; > + default: > + break; > + } Is a switch necessary here? An if statement could accomplish the same thing struct cros_ec_uart *ec_uart = data; struct acpi_resource_uart_serialbus *sb = &ares->data.uart_serial_bus; if (ares->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPEC_SERIAL_BUS && sb->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_SERIAL_TYPE_UART) { ec_uart->baudrate = sb->default_baud_rate; .... } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int cros_ec_uart_acpi_probe(struct cros_ec_uart *ec_uart) > +{ > + LIST_HEAD(resources); > + struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&ec_uart->serdev->dev); > + int ret; It's not a strict requirement, but it's always nice to list the initializer list in decreasing (or increasing) order of line length; > + > + /* Retrieve UART ACPI info */ Unnecessary comment. > + ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resources, > + cros_ec_uart_resource, ec_uart); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resources); > + > + /* Retrieve GpioInt and translate it to Linux IRQ number */ > + ret = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(adev, 0); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + ec_uart->irq = ret; > + dev_dbg(&ec_uart->serdev->dev, "IRQ number %d\n", ec_uart->irq); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct serdev_device_ops cros_ec_uart_client_ops = { > + .receive_buf = cros_ec_uart_rx_bytes, > +}; > + > +static int cros_ec_uart_probe(struct serdev_device *serdev) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &serdev->dev; > + struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev; > + struct cros_ec_uart *ec_uart; > + int ret; > + > + ec_uart = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ec_uart), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!ec_uart) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + ec_dev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ec_dev), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!ec_dev) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + ec_uart->serdev = serdev; > + > + /* Open the serial device */ > + ret = devm_serdev_device_open(dev, ec_uart->serdev); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "Unable to open UART device"); > + return ret; > + } > + > + serdev_device_set_drvdata(serdev, ec_dev); > + Unnecessary newline. > + serdev_device_set_client_ops(serdev, &cros_ec_uart_client_ops); > + > + /* Initialize wait queue */ > + init_waitqueue_head(&ec_uart->response.wait_queue); > + > + ret = cros_ec_uart_acpi_probe(ec_uart); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get ACPI info (%d)", ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > + /* Set baud rate of serial device */ > + ret = serdev_device_set_baudrate(serdev, ec_uart->baudrate); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set up host baud rate (%d)", ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > + /* Set flow control of serial device */ > + serdev_device_set_flow_control(serdev, ec_uart->flowcontrol); > + > + /* Initialize ec_dev for cros_ec */ > + ec_dev->phys_name = dev_name(dev); > + ec_dev->dev = dev; > + ec_dev->priv = ec_uart; > + ec_dev->irq = ec_uart->irq; > + ec_dev->cmd_xfer = NULL; > + ec_dev->pkt_xfer = cros_ec_uart_pkt_xfer; > + ec_dev->din_size = sizeof(struct ec_host_response) + > + sizeof(struct ec_response_get_protocol_info); > + ec_dev->dout_size = sizeof(struct ec_host_request); > + > + /* Register a new cros_ec device */ > + return cros_ec_register(ec_dev); > +} > + > +static void cros_ec_uart_remove(struct serdev_device *serdev) > +{ > + struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(serdev); > + > + cros_ec_unregister(ec_dev); > +}; > + > +static int __maybe_unused cros_ec_uart_suspend(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + > + return cros_ec_suspend(ec_dev); > +} > + > +static int __maybe_unused cros_ec_uart_resume(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + > + return cros_ec_resume(ec_dev); > +} > + > +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(cros_ec_uart_pm_ops, cros_ec_uart_suspend, > + cros_ec_uart_resume); > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > +static const struct acpi_device_id cros_ec_uart_acpi_id[] = { > + { "GOOG0019", 0 }, > + { /* sentinel */ } > +}; > + > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, cros_ec_uart_acpi_id); > +#endif > + > +static struct serdev_device_driver cros_ec_uart_driver = { > + .driver = { > + .name = "cros-ec-uart", > + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(cros_ec_uart_acpi_id), > + .pm = &cros_ec_uart_pm_ops, > + }, > + .probe = cros_ec_uart_probe, > + .remove = cros_ec_uart_remove, > +}; > + > +module_serdev_device_driver(cros_ec_uart_driver); > + > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("UART interface for ChromeOS Embedded Controller"); > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Bhanu Prakash Maiya <bhanumaiya@chromium.org>"); > -- > 2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog > > Best regards, [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#commenting [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bdc48fa11e46f867ea4d75fa59ee87a7f48be144 [3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1-rc7/source/include/linux/wait.h#L510
Sorry, one other thing: On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 1:12 PM Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 12:13 PM Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > This patch does following: > > 1. Adds a new cros-ec-uart driver. This driver can send EC requests on > > UART and process response packets received on UART transport. > > 2. Once probed, this driver will initialize the serdev device based on > > the underlying information in the ACPI resource. After serdev device > > properties are set, this driver will register itself cros-ec. > > 3. High level driver can use this implementation to talk to ChromeOS > > Embedded Controller device in case it supports UART as transport. > > 4. When cros-ec driver initiates a request packet, outgoing message is > > processed in buffer and sent via serdev. Once bytes are sent, driver > > enables a wait_queue. > > 5. Since ChromeOS EC device sends response asynchronously, AP's TTY > > driver accumulates response bytes and calls the registered callback. > > TTY driver can send multiple callback for bytes ranging from 1 to MAX > > bytes supported by EC device. > > 6. Driver waits for EC_MSG_DEADLINE_MS to collect and process received > > bytes. It wakes wait_queue if expected bytes are received or else > > wait_queue timeout. Based on the error condition, driver returns > > data_len or error to cros_ec. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bhanu Prakash Maiya <bhanumaiya@chromium.org> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@chromium.org> It is not clear who is the author of this patch. I'm guessing it is Mark Hasemayer, since they're the sender, but in that case their Signed-off-by tag should be first [4]. If it is Bhanu Prakash Maiya, then the git commit should list them as the author. Also note that for patches which are developed by > 1 person, Co-developed-by is an option to share attribution. > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#commenting > [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bdc48fa11e46f867ea4d75fa59ee87a7f48be144 > [3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1-rc7/source/include/linux/wait.h#L510 [4] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html?highlight=signed%20off#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin
> + /* Received bytes are more the allocated buffer*/ > + ec_uart->response.error = -EMSGSIZE; > + > + /* Wake the calling thread */ > + wake_up_interruptible(&ec_uart->response.wait_queue); I believe the "received" conditional variable should be set before calling wake_up_interruptible. Otherwise the calling thread will not be (immediately) awakened as the condition is still false. Currently, the calling thread will wait until it times out in this case.
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 2585e7edc3358..8ed08316fd11e 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -4918,6 +4918,13 @@ S: Maintained F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/google,cros-ec-codec.yaml F: sound/soc/codecs/cros_ec_codec.* +CHROMEOS EC UART DRIVER +M: Bhanu Prakash Maiya <bhanumaiya@chromium.org> +R: Benson Leung <bleung@google.com> +R: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> +S: Maintained +F: drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_uart.c + CHROMEOS EC SUBDRIVERS M: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org> R: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig index 6b954c5acadb1..d4a95ec261ed3 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig @@ -119,6 +119,16 @@ config CROS_EC_SPI response time cannot be guaranteed, we support ignoring 'pre-amble' bytes before the response actually starts. +config CROS_EC_UART + tristate "ChromeOS Embedded Controller (UART)" + depends on CROS_EC && ACPI && SERIAL_DEV_BUS + help + If you say Y here, you get support for talking to the ChromeOS EC + through a UART, using a byte-level protocol. + + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the + module will be called cros_ec_uart. + config CROS_EC_LPC tristate "ChromeOS Embedded Controller (LPC)" depends on CROS_EC && ACPI && (X86 || COMPILE_TEST) diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/Makefile b/drivers/platform/chrome/Makefile index 2950610101f15..6f5b6f01940db 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/Makefile +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/Makefile @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_EC_ISHTP) += cros_ec_ishtp.o obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_TYPEC_SWITCH) += cros_typec_switch.o obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_EC_RPMSG) += cros_ec_rpmsg.o obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_EC_SPI) += cros_ec_spi.o +obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_EC_UART) += cros_ec_uart.o cros_ec_lpcs-objs := cros_ec_lpc.o cros_ec_lpc_mec.o obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_EC_TYPEC) += cros_ec_typec.o obj-$(CONFIG_CROS_EC_LPC) += cros_ec_lpcs.o diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_uart.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_uart.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..ef9ac7ace04b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_uart.c @@ -0,0 +1,411 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * UART interface for ChromeOS Embedded Controller + * + * Copyright 2020-2022 Google LLC. + */ + +#include <linux/acpi.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/errno.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h> +#include <linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h> +#include <linux/serdev.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <uapi/linux/sched/types.h> + +#include "cros_ec.h" + +/* + * EC sends contiguous bytes of response packet on UART AP RX. + * TTY driver in AP accumulates incoming bytes and calls the registered callback + * function. Byte count can range from 1 to MAX bytes supported by EC. + * This driver should wait for long time for all callbacks to be processed. + * Considering the worst case scenario, wait for 500 msec. This timeout should + * account for max latency and some additional guard time. + * Best case: Entire packet is received in ~200 ms, wait queue will be released + * and packet will be processed. + * Worst case: TTY driver sends bytes in multiple callbacks. In this case this + * driver will wait for ~1 sec beyond which it will timeout. + * This timeout value should not exceed ~500 msec because in case if + * EC_CMD_REBOOT_EC sent, high level driver should be able to intercept EC + * in RO. + */ +#define EC_MSG_DEADLINE_MS 500 + +/** + * struct response_info - Encapsulate EC response related + * information for passing between function + * cros_ec_uart_pkt_xfer() and cros_ec_uart_rx_bytes() + * callback. + * @data: Copy the data received from EC here. + * @max_size: Max size allocated for the @data buffer. If the + * received data exceeds this value, we log an error. + * @size: Actual size of data received from EC. This is also + * used to accumulate byte count with response is received + * in dma chunks. + * @exp_len: Expected bytes of response from EC including header. + * @error: 0 for success, negative error code for a failure. + * @received: Set to true on receiving a valid EC response. + * @wait_queue: Wait queue EC response where the cros_ec sends request + * to EC and waits + */ +struct response_info { + void *data; + size_t max_size; + size_t size; + size_t exp_len; + int error; + bool received; + wait_queue_head_t wait_queue; +}; + +/** + * struct cros_ec_uart - information about a uart-connected EC + * + * @serdev_device: serdev uart device we are connected to. + * @baudrate: UART baudrate of attached EC device. + * @flowcontrol: UART flowcontrol of attached device. + * @irq: Linux IRQ number of associated serial device. + * @response: Response info passing between cros_ec_uart_pkt_xfer() + * and cros_ec_uart_rx_bytes() + */ +struct cros_ec_uart { + struct serdev_device *serdev; + u32 baudrate; + u8 flowcontrol; + u32 irq; + struct response_info response; +}; + +static int cros_ec_uart_rx_bytes(struct serdev_device *serdev, + const u8 *data, + size_t count) +{ + struct ec_host_response *response; + struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(serdev); + struct cros_ec_uart *ec_uart = ec_dev->priv; + + /* Check if bytes were sent out of band */ + if (!ec_uart->response.data) + /* Discard all bytes */ + return count; + + /* + * Check if incoming bytes + response.size are less than allocated + * buffer in din by cros_ec. This will ensure that if EC sends more + * bytes than max_size, waiting process will be notified with an error. + */ + if (ec_uart->response.size + count <= ec_uart->response.max_size) { + /* Copy bytes in data in buffer */ + memcpy((void *)ec_uart->response.data + ec_uart->response.size, + (void *)data, count); + + /* Add incoming bytes in size */ + ec_uart->response.size += count; + + /* + * Read data_len if we received response header and if exp_len + * was not read before. + */ + if (ec_uart->response.size >= sizeof(*response) && + ec_uart->response.exp_len == 0) { + /* Get expected response length from response header */ + response = (struct ec_host_response *) + ec_uart->response.data; + + ec_uart->response.exp_len = response->data_len + + sizeof(*response); + } + + /* + * If driver received response header and payload from EC, + * Wake up the wait queue. + */ + if (ec_uart->response.size >= sizeof(*response) && + ec_uart->response.size == ec_uart->response.exp_len) { + /* Set flag before waking up the caller */ + ec_uart->response.received = true; + + /* Wake the calling thread */ + wake_up_interruptible(&ec_uart->response.wait_queue); + } + } else { + /* Received bytes are more the allocated buffer*/ + ec_uart->response.error = -EMSGSIZE; + + /* Wake the calling thread */ + wake_up_interruptible(&ec_uart->response.wait_queue); + } + + return count; +} + +static int cros_ec_uart_pkt_xfer(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, + struct cros_ec_command *ec_msg) +{ + struct cros_ec_uart *ec_uart = ec_dev->priv; + struct serdev_device *serdev = ec_uart->serdev; + struct ec_host_response *response; + unsigned int len; + int ret, i; + u8 sum = 0; + + /* Prepare an outgoing message in the output buffer */ + len = cros_ec_prepare_tx(ec_dev, ec_msg); + dev_dbg(ec_dev->dev, "Prepared len=%d\n", len); + + /* Setup for incoming response */ + ec_uart->response.data = ec_dev->din; + ec_uart->response.max_size = ec_dev->din_size; + ec_uart->response.size = 0; + ec_uart->response.error = 0; + ec_uart->response.exp_len = 0; + ec_uart->response.received = false; + + /* Write serial device buffer */ + ret = serdev_device_write_buf(serdev, ec_dev->dout, len); + if (ret < len) { + dev_err(ec_dev->dev, "Unable to write data"); + + /* Return EIO as controller had issues writing buffer */ + ret = -EIO; + goto exit; + } + + /* Once request is successfully sent to EC, wait to wait_queue */ + wait_event_interruptible_timeout(ec_uart->response.wait_queue, + ec_uart->response.received, + msecs_to_jiffies(EC_MSG_DEADLINE_MS)); + + /* Check if wait_queue was interrupted due to an error */ + if (ec_uart->response.error < 0) { + dev_warn(ec_dev->dev, "Response error detected.\n"); + + ret = ec_uart->response.error; + goto exit; + } + + /* Check if valid response was received or there was a timeout */ + if (!ec_uart->response.received) { + dev_warn(ec_dev->dev, "EC failed to respond in time.\n"); + + ret = -ETIMEDOUT; + goto exit; + } + + /* Check response error code */ + response = (struct ec_host_response *)ec_dev->din; + ec_msg->result = response->result; + + /* Check if received response is longer than expected */ + if (response->data_len > ec_msg->insize) { + dev_err(ec_dev->dev, "Resp too long (%d bytes, expected %d)", + response->data_len, + ec_msg->insize); + ret = -ENOSPC; + goto exit; + } + + /* Validate checksum */ + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*response) + response->data_len; i++) + sum += ec_dev->din[i]; + + if (sum) { + dev_err(ec_dev->dev, + "Bad packet checksum calculated %x\n", + sum); + ret = -EBADMSG; + goto exit; + } + + /* Copy response packet to ec_msg data buffer */ + memcpy(ec_msg->data, + ec_dev->din + sizeof(*response), + response->data_len); + + /* Return data_len to cros_ec */ + ret = response->data_len; + +exit: + /* Reset ec_uart */ + ec_uart->response.data = NULL; + ec_uart->response.max_size = 0; + ec_uart->response.size = 0; + ec_uart->response.error = 0; + ec_uart->response.exp_len = 0; + ec_uart->response.received = false; + + if (ec_msg->command == EC_CMD_REBOOT_EC) + msleep(EC_REBOOT_DELAY_MS); + + return ret; +} + +static int cros_ec_uart_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data) +{ + struct cros_ec_uart *ec_uart = data; + struct acpi_resource_uart_serialbus *sb; + + switch (ares->type) { + case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS: + sb = &ares->data.uart_serial_bus; + if (sb->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_SERIAL_TYPE_UART) { + ec_uart->baudrate = sb->default_baud_rate; + dev_dbg(&ec_uart->serdev->dev, "Baudrate %d\n", + ec_uart->baudrate); + + ec_uart->flowcontrol = sb->flow_control; + dev_dbg(&ec_uart->serdev->dev, "Flow control %d\n", + ec_uart->flowcontrol); + } + break; + default: + break; + } + + return 0; +} + +static int cros_ec_uart_acpi_probe(struct cros_ec_uart *ec_uart) +{ + LIST_HEAD(resources); + struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&ec_uart->serdev->dev); + int ret; + + /* Retrieve UART ACPI info */ + ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resources, + cros_ec_uart_resource, ec_uart); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resources); + + /* Retrieve GpioInt and translate it to Linux IRQ number */ + ret = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(adev, 0); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + ec_uart->irq = ret; + dev_dbg(&ec_uart->serdev->dev, "IRQ number %d\n", ec_uart->irq); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct serdev_device_ops cros_ec_uart_client_ops = { + .receive_buf = cros_ec_uart_rx_bytes, +}; + +static int cros_ec_uart_probe(struct serdev_device *serdev) +{ + struct device *dev = &serdev->dev; + struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev; + struct cros_ec_uart *ec_uart; + int ret; + + ec_uart = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ec_uart), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ec_uart) + return -ENOMEM; + + ec_dev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ec_dev), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ec_dev) + return -ENOMEM; + + ec_uart->serdev = serdev; + + /* Open the serial device */ + ret = devm_serdev_device_open(dev, ec_uart->serdev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "Unable to open UART device"); + return ret; + } + + serdev_device_set_drvdata(serdev, ec_dev); + + serdev_device_set_client_ops(serdev, &cros_ec_uart_client_ops); + + /* Initialize wait queue */ + init_waitqueue_head(&ec_uart->response.wait_queue); + + ret = cros_ec_uart_acpi_probe(ec_uart); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get ACPI info (%d)", ret); + return ret; + } + + /* Set baud rate of serial device */ + ret = serdev_device_set_baudrate(serdev, ec_uart->baudrate); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set up host baud rate (%d)", ret); + return ret; + } + + /* Set flow control of serial device */ + serdev_device_set_flow_control(serdev, ec_uart->flowcontrol); + + /* Initialize ec_dev for cros_ec */ + ec_dev->phys_name = dev_name(dev); + ec_dev->dev = dev; + ec_dev->priv = ec_uart; + ec_dev->irq = ec_uart->irq; + ec_dev->cmd_xfer = NULL; + ec_dev->pkt_xfer = cros_ec_uart_pkt_xfer; + ec_dev->din_size = sizeof(struct ec_host_response) + + sizeof(struct ec_response_get_protocol_info); + ec_dev->dout_size = sizeof(struct ec_host_request); + + /* Register a new cros_ec device */ + return cros_ec_register(ec_dev); +} + +static void cros_ec_uart_remove(struct serdev_device *serdev) +{ + struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(serdev); + + cros_ec_unregister(ec_dev); +}; + +static int __maybe_unused cros_ec_uart_suspend(struct device *dev) +{ + struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + + return cros_ec_suspend(ec_dev); +} + +static int __maybe_unused cros_ec_uart_resume(struct device *dev) +{ + struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + + return cros_ec_resume(ec_dev); +} + +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(cros_ec_uart_pm_ops, cros_ec_uart_suspend, + cros_ec_uart_resume); + +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI +static const struct acpi_device_id cros_ec_uart_acpi_id[] = { + { "GOOG0019", 0 }, + { /* sentinel */ } +}; + +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, cros_ec_uart_acpi_id); +#endif + +static struct serdev_device_driver cros_ec_uart_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "cros-ec-uart", + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(cros_ec_uart_acpi_id), + .pm = &cros_ec_uart_pm_ops, + }, + .probe = cros_ec_uart_probe, + .remove = cros_ec_uart_remove, +}; + +module_serdev_device_driver(cros_ec_uart_driver); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("UART interface for ChromeOS Embedded Controller"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Bhanu Prakash Maiya <bhanumaiya@chromium.org>");