From patchwork Thu Nov 9 18:54:36 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kuan-Wei Chiu X-Patchwork-Id: 13451642 Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com (mail-pl1-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A235D2ED for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 18:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="cWblSsI0" Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1ca85ff26afso2564255ad.1 for ; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 10:55:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1699556107; x=1700160907; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=PRi+qAy0bRoafy49vwIjB8vcVV09afunArSCgU/jH/8=; b=cWblSsI05tDOMypX8xc1WVNcFcYPSAC7D3nTWdbC+1jZb/Ihvsn/kHaavWKw8gs147 xN/ElTPi/CfWdh4eyxzgXPDcjfLlUL5IJSwPCFeNFGGZ5GsIBiQ+cuUFwCcOJFWpt3bK 4tdTXRbsWWExy6zZlneiX8Os5w/nv2DeOtXelShrQ985VAkb+3OvCZoh3L7ymC0JYzZL B79TDj5bLyJaoF5be0zjFUOAGhxkUzDnmh462fxhXiEM6mh/nbTX8HY6Fu2cz7VZGCc4 mcf/AUmCRMmXPwDunjQ5dYR4xNdbDLLbks7ZH5ndTguowIPVdgzgiMOVCGw5ur30CQmm ET6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699556107; x=1700160907; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PRi+qAy0bRoafy49vwIjB8vcVV09afunArSCgU/jH/8=; b=h3vG75N8cuGqebYz9lTnwKn+18fdxbslRaUX6P2sA1iGLcYzqA2YcySrneNheAQBUV oz/SjCEvi4nRJc0LBbzPcItTjgwoOc7rgUCPpI0DCjmkvX4ynZ4c0uBor5X8s5Mxv+vp jwFkVnVPykQK94071vmlthIdYNR2Bbpt5xIk7EtQNel27TqCtNsx+1eSRjcvMrzR9Xxc Nt+09GOU1HhVqmM1dn9sSZN+HBo7k4cM2dNFwcYBK59UECqW81VMF7WJWljK/u4tRc8/ peMdulMayE4W/8rsR6pH9/w9IY0c0g+EBHFIAwivlJsemVH2XjTYOLEkfvZW+3U07o06 ONoA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzcMT+nJ5jKEwagjze3NEJigPwhyNHrM/CEDUcXk2amhr0iU0p3 SA8++UzBGQ3oGvtYV26PIWY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEjlXJkC2bw7tWXPOMaDfWHKiPmPN5r1CPOZIEmM6XpA/df2WMR8wr6JLELmvE8T9Bj+So2cQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c943:b0:1c7:5581:f9c with SMTP id i3-20020a170902c94300b001c755810f9cmr6369730pla.0.1699556106845; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 10:55:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([140.116.154.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w19-20020a170902d71300b001c61921d4d2sm3821837ply.302.2023.11.09.10.55.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Nov 2023 10:55:06 -0800 (PST) From: Kuan-Wei Chiu To: bleung@chromium.org, tzungbi@kernel.org Cc: groeck@chromium.org, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kuan-Wei Chiu Subject: [PATCH 4/7] platform/chrome: Fix typo 'lantency' in comment Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 02:54:36 +0800 Message-Id: <20231109185439.1535962-5-visitorckw@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20231109185439.1535962-1-visitorckw@gmail.com> References: <20231109185439.1535962-1-visitorckw@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Replace 'lantency' with 'latency' in the comment. Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu --- drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c index 85764e62cbe4..92faf701b8f0 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static s64 cros_ec_sensor_ring_median(s64 *array, size_t length) * While a and b are recorded at accurate times (due to the EC real time * nature); c is pretty untrustworthy, even though it's recorded the * first thing in ec_irq_handler(). There is a very good change we'll get - * added lantency due to: + * added latency due to: * other irqs * ddrfreq * cpuidle