@@ -314,6 +314,13 @@ static int cros_ec_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(cros_ec_rtc_pm_ops, cros_ec_rtc_suspend,
cros_ec_rtc_resume);
+static void cros_ec_disable_wakeup(void *data)
+{
+ struct device *dev = data;
+
+ device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
+}
+
static int cros_ec_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct cros_ec_dev *ec_dev = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
@@ -343,6 +350,11 @@ static int cros_ec_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
}
+ ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, cros_ec_disable_wakeup,
+ &pdev->dev);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
cros_ec_rtc->rtc = devm_rtc_allocate_device(&pdev->dev);
if (IS_ERR(cros_ec_rtc->rtc))
return PTR_ERR(cros_ec_rtc->rtc);
Current code leaves the device's wakeup enabled in the error path of .probe(), which results in a memory leak. Fix it by calling devm_add_action_or_reset() with a callback which calls device_init_wakeup(dev, false). This bug was found by an experimental static analysis tool that I am developing. Fixes: 6f2a71a31afd ("rtc: cros-ec: add cros-ec-rtc driver.") Signed-off-by: Joe Hattori <joe@pf.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> --- drivers/rtc/rtc-cros-ec.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)