@@ -2646,6 +2646,21 @@ wdata_send_pages(struct cifs_writedata *wdata, unsigned int nr_pages,
return rc;
}
+static int
+cifs_writepage_locked(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc);
+
+static int cifs_write_one_page(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc,
+ void *data)
+{
+ struct address_space *mapping = data;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = cifs_writepage_locked(page, wbc);
+ unlock_page(page);
+ mapping_set_error(mapping, ret);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int cifs_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
@@ -2662,10 +2677,11 @@ static int cifs_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
/*
* If wsize is smaller than the page cache size, default to writing
- * one page at a time via cifs_writepage
+ * one page at a time.
*/
if (cifs_sb->ctx->wsize < PAGE_SIZE)
- return generic_writepages(mapping, wbc);
+ return write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, cifs_write_one_page,
+ mapping);
xid = get_xid();
if (wbc->range_cyclic) {
generic_writepages is just a wrapper that calls ->writepages on a range, and thus in the way of eventually removing ->writepage. Switch cifs to just open code it in preparation of removing ->writepage. [note: I suspect just integrating the small wsize case with the rest of the writeback code might be a better idea here, but that needs someone more familiar with the code] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> --- fs/cifs/file.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)