Message ID | 20241216204124.3752367-14-dhowells@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EE921EF084 for <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 20:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734381803; cv=none; b=tW//83DiSTNUhSAVcbosYnMmdmKm48OatN3VmWIRzMjPcb5XP+Fb4sebpvb0YVY2/GzxSzF9XvXGfh64sXkmboUGX8ZREVEdLHSpHXvGFzXM2BmbjdI+11XzZGB95ZjRvXtZqeGBoLP8T0zcBqjZpw/DKQdM1pPP0UYpN79+VTc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734381803; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5o211Bs9aPlGXgBOv9ZEWRYTJwfzYdkVK8vs4FoRbiQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=k4zTYWbzxNLsLrjwxJQZ5fllKSB3sBh/azOTwJ9NXuTKUW9QqwWeI7x40RsgpukeVxkV6OCJ0ImdOYZ+X6JyMk96LuBLnS3BZYf1TmnW2mAZyuvXDzaRJGJ8yPat4h9s8kpT2ClsCCMPsvyulGdWjb7kdOjrL10+KC834gc0YXs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=UmeuCrr7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="UmeuCrr7" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1734381801; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HO1trrAUxh6ged928OSrE9rZIbGVfYli8k1F5yQtGbY=; b=UmeuCrr7d3vwkXMjSIYIAsom+5iLNYP3ahyp2T9/aXsmR19BcOZ23zd6mkFIOPhclkvvvz 5r1/NATewULVHDOMfoM2Qcyk8rQ+Q4JaisD6Mp0hz9m/h1aY8M+h9UpB/Og7iBvF8fMJeT hxIuJa3yPpQSU6/vwQzBzfPgJd18Nwg= Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-556-BIkIYcVIPqyGpZGyQNMtTQ-1; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 15:43:16 -0500 X-MC-Unique: BIkIYcVIPqyGpZGyQNMtTQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: BIkIYcVIPqyGpZGyQNMtTQ Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4724195609D; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 20:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.com (unknown [10.42.28.48]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5B6300F9B5; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 20:43:06 +0000 (UTC) From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>, Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>, Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>, Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>, Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>, netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 13/32] afs: Fix directory format encoding struct Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 20:41:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20241216204124.3752367-14-dhowells@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20241216204124.3752367-1-dhowells@redhat.com> References: <20241216204124.3752367-1-dhowells@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: <linux-cifs.vger.kernel.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-cifs+subscribe@vger.kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-cifs+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 |
Series |
netfs: Read performance improvements and "single-blob" support
|
expand
|
diff --git a/fs/afs/xdr_fs.h b/fs/afs/xdr_fs.h index 8ca868164507..cc5f143d21a3 100644 --- a/fs/afs/xdr_fs.h +++ b/fs/afs/xdr_fs.h @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ union afs_xdr_dir_block { struct { struct afs_xdr_dir_hdr hdr; - u8 alloc_ctrs[AFS_DIR_MAX_BLOCKS]; + u8 alloc_ctrs[AFS_DIR_BLOCKS_WITH_CTR]; __be16 hashtable[AFS_DIR_HASHTBL_SIZE]; } meta;
The AFS directory format structure, union afs_xdr_dir_block::meta, has too many alloc counter slots declared and so pushes the hash table along and over the data. This doesn't cause a problem at the moment because I'm currently ignoring the hash table and only using the correct number of alloc_ctrs in the code anyway. In future, however, I should start using the hash table to try and speed up afs_lookup(). Fix this by using the correct constant to declare the counter array. Fixes: 4ea219a839bf ("afs: Split the directory content defs into a header") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org --- fs/afs/xdr_fs.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)