Message ID | 20200909044233.4115-1-wens@csie.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ti-cpufreq backport | expand |
Hi! > This is the final part of MOXA's PM / OPP / ti-cpufreq backport series. > Part 2, which consisted of OPP / cpufreq-dt cleanups, is abandoned in > favor of directly backporting the ti-cpufreq driver. > > This part includes a couple of patches to the PM / OPP subsystem to > expose required APIs, and deal with the v1/v2 mixed OPP table used > by am33xx. The rest are the backport of the ti-cpufreq driver, and > fixes for this driver. The fixes were requested by CIP kernel > maintainers as part of MOXA's previous attempt to backport ti-cpufreq. > They are included as separate patches, as there are quite a few of them > spread over multiple kernel releases. > > The result is that my BeagleBone Black can run at higher speeds than > without the ti-cpufreq driver due to having a better silicon > revision. The series looks good to me. I can apply it if it passes testing and there are no other comments. Best regards, Pavel
Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel@denx.de] > Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 4:04 PM > To: Chen-Yu Tsai (Moxa) <wens@csie.org> > Cc: iwamatsu nobuhiro(岩松 信洋 □SWC◯ACT) <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>; pavel@denx.de; > cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org; JohnsonCH.Chen@moxa.com; victor.yu@moxa.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4.y-cip 00/11] ti-cpufreq backport > > Hi! > > > This is the final part of MOXA's PM / OPP / ti-cpufreq backport series. > > Part 2, which consisted of OPP / cpufreq-dt cleanups, is abandoned in > > favor of directly backporting the ti-cpufreq driver. > > > > This part includes a couple of patches to the PM / OPP subsystem to > > expose required APIs, and deal with the v1/v2 mixed OPP table used > > by am33xx. The rest are the backport of the ti-cpufreq driver, and > > fixes for this driver. The fixes were requested by CIP kernel > > maintainers as part of MOXA's previous attempt to backport ti-cpufreq. > > They are included as separate patches, as there are quite a few of them > > spread over multiple kernel releases. > > > > The result is that my BeagleBone Black can run at higher speeds than > > without the ti-cpufreq driver due to having a better silicon > > revision. > > The series looks good to me. I can apply it if it passes testing and > there are no other comments. This patch series looks good to me too. So, I applied and pushed. > > Best regards, > Pavel Best regards, Nobuhiro -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#5438): https://lists.cip-project.org/g/cip-dev/message/5438 Mute This Topic: https://lists.cip-project.org/mt/76726426/4520428 Group Owner: cip-dev+owner@lists.cip-project.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.cip-project.org/g/cip-dev/leave/8129116/1171672734/xyzzy [patchwork-cip-dev@patchwork.kernel.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-