From patchwork Tue Oct 20 14:57:16 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Lad Prabhakar X-Patchwork-Id: 11847145 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0A9C5517A for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web01.groups.io (web01.groups.io [66.175.222.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0428C206DB for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lists.cip-project.org header.i=@lists.cip-project.org header.b="aWCI9ewB" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0428C206DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bp.renesas.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bounce+64572+5607+4520388+8129055@lists.cip-project.org X-Received: by 127.0.0.2 with SMTP id 8ndMYY4521723xHo02iDaDLu; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:57:52 -0700 X-Received: from relmlie6.idc.renesas.com (relmlie6.idc.renesas.com []) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web09.8061.1603205857454945281 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:57:50 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,397,1596466800"; d="scan'208";a="60088194" X-Received: from unknown (HELO relmlir6.idc.renesas.com) ([10.200.68.152]) by relmlie6.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2020 23:57:50 +0900 X-Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [10.226.36.204]) by relmlir6.idc.renesas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B858433DEA0; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 23:57:48 +0900 (JST) From: "Lad Prabhakar" To: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu , Pavel Machek Cc: Biju Das , Lad Prabhakar Subject: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.19.y-cip 10/26] PCI: pci-epf-test: Do not allocate next BARs memory if current BAR is 64Bit Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:57:16 +0100 Message-Id: <20201020145732.30343-11-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> In-Reply-To: <20201020145732.30343-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> References: <20201020145732.30343-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> Precedence: Bulk List-Unsubscribe: Sender: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org List-Id: Mailing-List: list cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org; contact cip-dev+owner@lists.cip-project.org Reply-To: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org X-Gm-Message-State: dAsSS8ripNr2It85DIj1QMwfx4520388AA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lists.cip-project.org; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1603205872; bh=Pz5W8jdlUL6DWtg4kxBjsqByIyPI7o151zTSZYzf5yM=; h=Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=aWCI9ewBd4O/Q9M474UH/jCfbsqyOqnXwE0YiIG74C7f9wz4wsa3cD7r8sNaQTQrxTi Au4d76+nWrvjRMas/sy7gqRZZpjzTZCYcXCz/Vq7V13FO+duLoOEbo/Rac1+jIqZMXg5M vtT+1N5+cRhT9RtW9850cEEv1bfF9gwa/Hs= From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I commit b866c56b66d88a632e2fa6b922c4ea051937acbd upstream. It's useless to allocate memory for next BAR if the current BAR is a 64Bit BAR. Stop allocating memory for the next BAR, if the current BARs flag indicates this is a 64Bit BAR. Tested-by: Gustavo Pimentel Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar --- drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c index ad0efa4446ba..a385927a9239 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c @@ -429,6 +429,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf) { struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = epf_get_drvdata(epf); struct device *dev = &epf->dev; + struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar; void *base; int bar; enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = epf_test->test_reg_bar; @@ -442,6 +443,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf) epf_test->reg[test_reg_bar] = base; for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) { + epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar]; if (bar == test_reg_bar) continue; base = pci_epf_alloc_space(epf, bar_size[bar], bar); @@ -449,6 +451,8 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf) dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate space for BAR%d\n", bar); epf_test->reg[bar] = base; + if (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) + bar++; } return 0;