| Message ID | 20220830140156.2326-1-Sai.Sathujoda@toshiba-tsip.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Handled Elsewhere |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [isar-cip-core] cip-core-image-security.bb: Add duplicity package to enable IEC requirement | expand |
On 30.08.22 16:01, Sai.Sathujoda@toshiba-tsip.com wrote: > From: Sai <Sai.Sathujoda@toshiba-tsip.com> > > Duplicity package provides below features in order to implement IEC > requirement "Control System Backup" > 1. Backup and restore > 2. Encryption of backup > 3. Checks integrity before restore > > Python3-paramiko package is required to enable remote backups. > > Signed-off-by: Sai <Sai.Sathujoda@toshiba-tsip.com> > --- > recipes-core/images/cip-core-image-security.bb | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/recipes-core/images/cip-core-image-security.bb b/recipes-core/images/cip-core-image-security.bb > index 24b1f46..9e9e43a 100644 > --- a/recipes-core/images/cip-core-image-security.bb > +++ b/recipes-core/images/cip-core-image-security.bb > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ IMAGE_PREINSTALL += " \ > sudo \ > aide-common \ > libpam-google-authenticator \ > + duplicity python3-paramiko \ > " > > OVERRIDES_append = ":${BASE_DISTRO_CODENAME}" What was the status of the related discussion again? Didn't we decide against such a tool? I mean, most embedded devices in the field are stateless or only contain state that is not critical to back up. In that case, this tool is completely useless. Jan
diff --git a/recipes-core/images/cip-core-image-security.bb b/recipes-core/images/cip-core-image-security.bb index 24b1f46..9e9e43a 100644 --- a/recipes-core/images/cip-core-image-security.bb +++ b/recipes-core/images/cip-core-image-security.bb @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ IMAGE_PREINSTALL += " \ sudo \ aide-common \ libpam-google-authenticator \ + duplicity python3-paramiko \ " OVERRIDES_append = ":${BASE_DISTRO_CODENAME}"