Message ID | 170449229696.3779673.18384234151739803343.stgit@djiang5-mobl3 |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | cxl: find_cxl_root() related cleanups | expand |
Dave Jiang wrote: > v6: > - Fix breakage in previous series for device_find_child() (Dan) > - Move DEFINE_FREE() for put_cxl_root() to first patch (Dan) > - Don't touch put_device() until final cleanup. (Dan) > - Add review tag from Ira. > > This series provides a number of small cleanups to make fix_cxl_root() > and related code more readable and safer. Looks good, Dave! Thanks for the spins.
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 14:35:14 -0800 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > Dave Jiang wrote: > > v6: > > - Fix breakage in previous series for device_find_child() (Dan) > > - Move DEFINE_FREE() for put_cxl_root() to first patch (Dan) > > - Don't touch put_device() until final cleanup. (Dan) > > - Add review tag from Ira. > > > > This series provides a number of small cleanups to make fix_cxl_root() > > and related code more readable and safer. > > Looks good, Dave! Thanks for the spins. > Subject to Robert's note on removing the root variable in patch 5 as it now appears unused, this series looks fine to me (and I guess Dan can probably just fix that up in the tree) FWIW given this is already queued in in cxl/next Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 14:35:14 -0800 > Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > Dave Jiang wrote: > > > v6: > > > - Fix breakage in previous series for device_find_child() (Dan) > > > - Move DEFINE_FREE() for put_cxl_root() to first patch (Dan) > > > - Don't touch put_device() until final cleanup. (Dan) > > > - Add review tag from Ira. > > > > > > This series provides a number of small cleanups to make fix_cxl_root() > > > and related code more readable and safer. > > > > Looks good, Dave! Thanks for the spins. > > > Subject to Robert's note on removing the root variable in patch 5 as it > now appears unused, this series looks fine to me (and I guess Dan can > probably just fix that up in the tree) > > FWIW given this is already queued in in cxl/next > > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Thanks Jonathan, will add that to the pull request.