| Message ID | 20230616161309.22387-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | dax: include bus.h for definition of run_dax() | expand |
Ben Dooks wrote: > The run_dax() prototype is defined in "bus.h" but drivers/dax/super.c > does not include this. Include bus.h to silece the following sparse > warning: > > drivers/dax/super.c:337:6: warning: symbol 'run_dax' was not declared. Should it be static? A different version of this fix has already been queued up. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm.git/commit/?h=libnvdimm-fixes&id=2d5153526f929838b0912ded26862840f72745f4 Thank you anyway, Ira
diff --git a/drivers/dax/super.c b/drivers/dax/super.c index c4c4728a36e4..8c05dae19bfe 100644 --- a/drivers/dax/super.c +++ b/drivers/dax/super.c @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include <linux/dax.h> #include <linux/fs.h> #include "dax-private.h" +#include "bus.h" /** * struct dax_device - anchor object for dax services
The run_dax() prototype is defined in "bus.h" but drivers/dax/super.c does not include this. Include bus.h to silece the following sparse warning: drivers/dax/super.c:337:6: warning: symbol 'run_dax' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> --- drivers/dax/super.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)