diff mbox series

[v4,1/4] cxl/pci: Fix to record only non-zero ranges

Message ID 20240828084231.1378789-2-yanfei.xu@intel.com
State Accepted
Commit 55e268694e8b07026c88191f9b6949b6887d9ce3
Headers show
Series cxl: Fixes for hdm decoder initialization from DVSEC ranges | expand

Commit Message

Yanfei Xu Aug. 28, 2024, 8:42 a.m. UTC
The function cxl_dvsec_rr_decode() retrieves and records DVSEC ranges
into info->dvsec_range[], regardless of whether it is non-zero range,
and the variable info->ranges indicates the number of non-zero ranges.
However, in cxl_hdm_decode_init(), the validation for
info->dvsec_range[] occurs in a for loop that iterates based on
info->ranges. It may result in zero range to be validated but non-zero
range not be validated, in turn, the number of allowed ranges is to be
0. Address it by only record non-zero ranges.

This fix is not urgent as it requires a configuration that zeroes out
the first dvsec range while populating the second. This has not been
observed, but it is theoretically possible. If this gets picked up for
-stable, no harm done, but there is no urgency to backport.

Fixes: 560f78559006 ("cxl/pci: Retrieve CXL DVSEC memory info")
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Alison Schofield Aug. 29, 2024, 9:49 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 04:42:28PM +0800, Yanfei Xu wrote:
> The function cxl_dvsec_rr_decode() retrieves and records DVSEC ranges
> into info->dvsec_range[], regardless of whether it is non-zero range,
> and the variable info->ranges indicates the number of non-zero ranges.
> However, in cxl_hdm_decode_init(), the validation for
> info->dvsec_range[] occurs in a for loop that iterates based on
> info->ranges. It may result in zero range to be validated but non-zero
> range not be validated, in turn, the number of allowed ranges is to be
> 0. Address it by only record non-zero ranges.
> 
> This fix is not urgent as it requires a configuration that zeroes out
> the first dvsec range while populating the second. This has not been
> observed, but it is theoretically possible. If this gets picked up for
> -stable, no harm done, but there is no urgency to backport.
> 

I'd prefer the commit msg be:
	cxl/pci: Record only non-zero DVSEC ranges

but either way -
Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>


> Fixes: 560f78559006 ("cxl/pci: Retrieve CXL DVSEC memory info")
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 8 +-------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

snip
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
index 51132a575b27..73b6498d5e5c 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
@@ -390,10 +390,6 @@  int cxl_dvsec_rr_decode(struct device *dev, int d,
 
 		size |= temp & CXL_DVSEC_MEM_SIZE_LOW_MASK;
 		if (!size) {
-			info->dvsec_range[i] = (struct range) {
-				.start = 0,
-				.end = CXL_RESOURCE_NONE,
-			};
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -411,12 +407,10 @@  int cxl_dvsec_rr_decode(struct device *dev, int d,
 
 		base |= temp & CXL_DVSEC_MEM_BASE_LOW_MASK;
 
-		info->dvsec_range[i] = (struct range) {
+		info->dvsec_range[ranges++] = (struct range) {
 			.start = base,
 			.end = base + size - 1
 		};
-
-		ranges++;
 	}
 
 	info->ranges = ranges;