From patchwork Thu Feb 29 00:54:49 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Fan Wu X-Patchwork-Id: 13576169 X-Patchwork-Delegate: snitzer@redhat.com Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7C92D60A for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=13.77.154.182 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709168124; cv=none; b=klrQKH//m/ZN7+rIuygE81lWYdpRZSQ5lpxMjT4ya8iKEm9rFc9Y9xFY7tcf8AelI/hAJ2Bk59h4qK9qikQn039pKXDmKAw1vXweTmcLRyhSRAwFIRqD2NWNWDMBL+yXwEOJF0T6UIrAvzkdhc+koN/PhyI0OD50+1oGC2pTWKc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709168124; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2A+DXjwEJJi7aKY/CFAlV71nJEqDfLJcHOOVwKIVAe0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References; b=lhvr614R86ZNzvovmueJS+WIXyFniR3QA1QRcZPlr1SD4tjXNhGuo1Gx/l3FeNr5R5ZyMQiK9s9EM8fhi86XWO6fg7KitfJImiQroYpz3X1iWLCcjx/YqfmGX+h9bo7VfNKQ2QJSlAn+Ji8RSHzJXZJSnVANCog0QlU9+ucBa48= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.microsoft.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b=mGYDI7uY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=13.77.154.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b="mGYDI7uY" Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1052) id C583020B74CD; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:55:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com C583020B74CD DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1709168118; bh=E1OuSZSaokICKhn+FmVzEp1tXTBWcoBKv0avlYzbfkQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mGYDI7uYsiryGkUmnFuKzdlzqQANNmc+HLkDROAGqfRacLnrMQrsTFE4pAnJLTHOm rRry7ucrVvuZI+4xU0k0CItaZmVQlVeJ7+osBnCceXtPqPakMacqARfiml1dj2tdsl zrJ+eCLw7uaEAaOu/j2bxG15+gOFZeVsMZ2bSFH4= From: Fan Wu To: corbet@lwn.net, zohar@linux.ibm.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, tytso@mit.edu, ebiggers@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org, eparis@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, audit@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fan Wu Subject: [RFC PATCH v13 07/20] security: add new securityfs delete function Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:54:49 -0800 Message-Id: <1709168102-7677-8-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1709168102-7677-1-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com> References: <1709168102-7677-1-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: When deleting a directory in the security file system, the existing securityfs_remove requires the directory to be empty, otherwise it will do nothing. This leads to a potential risk that the security file system might be in an unclean state when the intended deletion did not happen. This commit introduces a new function securityfs_recursive_remove to recursively delete a directory without leaving an unclean state. Co-developed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) Signed-off-by: Fan Wu --- v1-v8: + Not present v9: + Introduced v10: + No changes v11: + Fix code style issues v12: + No changes v13: + No changes --- include/linux/security.h | 1 + security/inode.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h index 619e17e59532..e74e8b2a07f4 100644 --- a/include/linux/security.h +++ b/include/linux/security.h @@ -2029,6 +2029,7 @@ struct dentry *securityfs_create_symlink(const char *name, const char *target, const struct inode_operations *iops); extern void securityfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry); +extern void securityfs_recursive_remove(struct dentry *dentry); #else /* CONFIG_SECURITYFS */ diff --git a/security/inode.c b/security/inode.c index 9e7cde913667..f21847badb7d 100644 --- a/security/inode.c +++ b/security/inode.c @@ -313,6 +313,31 @@ void securityfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(securityfs_remove); +static void remove_one(struct dentry *victim) +{ + simple_release_fs(&mount, &mount_count); +} + +/** + * securityfs_recursive_remove - recursively removes a file or directory + * + * @dentry: a pointer to a the dentry of the file or directory to be removed. + * + * This function recursively removes a file or directory in securityfs that was + * previously created with a call to another securityfs function (like + * securityfs_create_file() or variants thereof.) + */ +void securityfs_recursive_remove(struct dentry *dentry) +{ + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry)) + return; + + simple_pin_fs(&fs_type, &mount, &mount_count); + simple_recursive_removal(dentry, remove_one); + simple_release_fs(&mount, &mount_count); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(securityfs_recursive_remove); + #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY static struct dentry *lsm_dentry; static ssize_t lsm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, size_t count,