Message ID | 20140131154042.GA17221@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Delegated to: | Mike Snitzer |
Headers | show |
On 01/31/2014 04:40 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31 2014 at 4:10am -0500, > Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote: > >> There is no reason why multipath needs to queue requests >> internally for queue_if_no_path or pg_init; we should >> rather push them back onto the request queue. >> >> And while we're at it we can simplify the conditional >> statement in map_io() to make it easier to read. >> >> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> >> Cc: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com> >> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> >> --- >> drivers/md/dm-mpath.c | 115 ++++++++++++++---------------------------- >> drivers/md/dm.c | 13 +++++ >> include/linux/device-mapper.h | 1 + >> 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) > > ... > >> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c >> index 0704c52..291491b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/md/dm.c >> +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c >> @@ -1912,6 +1912,19 @@ static int dm_any_congested(void *congested_data, int bdi_bits) >> return r; >> } >> >> +void dm_table_run_queue(struct dm_table *t) >> +{ >> + struct mapped_device *md = dm_table_get_md(t); >> + unsigned long flags; >> + >> + if (md->queue) { >> + spin_lock_irqsave(md->queue->queue_lock, flags); >> + blk_run_queue_async(md->queue); >> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(md->queue->queue_lock, flags); >> + } >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dm_table_run_queue); >> + > > I think I agree with Junichi's previous point that this should live in > dm-table.c. You don't need the mapped_device, only the associated > request_queue, so... I know I implemented something like > dm_get_md_queue() before, but obviously it never went in for whatever > reason. > > Anyway, I think something like this would be ideal (I renamed to > dm_table_run_md_queue_async). Please feel free to fold this in and > repost with v4 of your patchset (assuming you'll be fixing up patch 3 > after you get Jun'ichi's feedback): > As mentioned, I don't mind. The layering conventions in the device-mapper code still confuses me occasionally. I'll be folding it in. Cheers, Hannes
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c index 6a7f2b8..72362ce 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-table.c @@ -1618,6 +1618,20 @@ struct mapped_device *dm_table_get_md(struct dm_table *t) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dm_table_get_md); +void dm_table_run_md_queue_async(struct dm_table *t) +{ + struct mapped_device *md = dm_table_get_md(t); + struct request_queue *queue = dm_get_md_queue(md); + unsigned long flags; + + if (queue) { + spin_lock_irqsave(queue->queue_lock, flags); + blk_run_queue_async(queue); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(queue->queue_lock, flags); + } +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dm_table_run_md_queue_async); + static int device_discard_capable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev, sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data) { diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c index b49c762..10cae7f 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c @@ -475,6 +475,11 @@ sector_t dm_get_size(struct mapped_device *md) return get_capacity(md->disk); } +struct request_queue *dm_get_md_queue(struct mapped_device *md) +{ + return md->queue; +} + struct dm_stats *dm_get_stats(struct mapped_device *md) { return &md->stats; diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.h b/drivers/md/dm.h index c4569f0..1b2ca8a 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm.h +++ b/drivers/md/dm.h @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ int dm_lock_for_deletion(struct mapped_device *md, bool mark_deferred, bool only int dm_cancel_deferred_remove(struct mapped_device *md); int dm_request_based(struct mapped_device *md); sector_t dm_get_size(struct mapped_device *md); +struct request_queue *dm_get_md_queue(struct mapped_device *md); struct dm_stats *dm_get_stats(struct mapped_device *md); int dm_kobject_uevent(struct mapped_device *md, enum kobject_action action,