From patchwork Fri Jun 23 15:27:01 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Heinz Mauelshagen X-Patchwork-Id: 9806785 X-Patchwork-Delegate: snitzer@redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA51C60329 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFB5285E8 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:27:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 6E14E28651; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:27:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EEE2285E8 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAD5530C43E; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:27:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com CAD5530C43E Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com CAD5530C43E Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 521556EC80; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB698263; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v5NFR6Y9007431 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:27:06 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 9573753C6A; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: dm-devel@redhat.com Received: from redhat.com.com (ovpn-117-242.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.242]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE9353C3A; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:27:03 +0000 (UTC) From: heinzm@redhat.com To: dm-devel@redhat.com Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 17:27:01 +0200 Message-Id: <20170623152701.20977-1-heinzm@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: heinzm@redhat.com Subject: [dm-devel] [PATCH] dm raid: fix oops on upgrading to extended superblock format X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:27:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Heinz Mauelshagen When a RAID set was created on dm-raid version < 1.9.0 (old RAID superblock format), none of the new members of the superblock have been set including the device sectors member needed to support shrinking. Don't access such member unconditionally. Add respective comments. Resolves: rhbz1464274 diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c index 7d89322..2e15623 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c @@ -1927,7 +1927,7 @@ struct dm_raid_superblock { /******************************************************************** * BELOW FOLLOW V1.9.0 EXTENSIONS TO THE PRISTINE SUPERBLOCK FORMAT!!! * - * FEATURE_FLAG_SUPPORTS_V190 in the features member indicates that those exist + * FEATURE_FLAG_SUPPORTS_V190 in the compat_features member indicates that those exist */ __le32 flags; /* Flags defining array states for reshaping */ @@ -2092,6 +2092,11 @@ static void super_sync(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev) sb->layout = cpu_to_le32(mddev->layout); sb->stripe_sectors = cpu_to_le32(mddev->chunk_sectors); + /******************************************************************** + * BELOW FOLLOW V1.9.0 EXTENSIONS TO THE PRISTINE SUPERBLOCK FORMAT!!! + * + * FEATURE_FLAG_SUPPORTS_V190 in the compat_features member indicates that those exist + */ sb->new_level = cpu_to_le32(mddev->new_level); sb->new_layout = cpu_to_le32(mddev->new_layout); sb->new_stripe_sectors = cpu_to_le32(mddev->new_chunk_sectors); @@ -2438,8 +2443,17 @@ static int super_validate(struct raid_set *rs, struct md_rdev *rdev) mddev->bitmap_info.default_offset = mddev->bitmap_info.offset; if (!test_and_clear_bit(FirstUse, &rdev->flags)) { - /* Retrieve device size stored in superblock to be prepared for shrink */ - rdev->sectors = le64_to_cpu(sb->sectors); + /* + * Retrieve rdev size stored in superblock to be prepared for shrink. + * + * Check extended superblock members present to + * access the size member or it will not be set! + * + * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1464274 + */ + if (le32_to_cpu(sb->compat_features) & FEATURE_FLAG_SUPPORTS_V190) + rdev->sectors = le64_to_cpu(sb->sectors); + rdev->recovery_offset = le64_to_cpu(sb->disk_recovery_offset); if (rdev->recovery_offset == MaxSector) set_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags);