From patchwork Fri Jun 22 15:06:16 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Bart Van Assche X-Patchwork-Id: 10482387 X-Patchwork-Delegate: snitzer@redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C0D6023A for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1475128EC7 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 0946E28F3C; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:07:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72AB928EC7 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA2B54E4CB; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEEA1308BDB6; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491C64A460; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w5MF7H1A003942 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 11:07:17 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 05E1A2010CC1; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: dm-devel@redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx12.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.41]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D95922010CA0; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from esa1.hgst.iphmx.com (esa1.hgst.iphmx.com [68.232.141.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (112/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A33BC308A94F; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:06:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wdc.com; i=@wdc.com; q=dns/txt; s=dkim.wdc.com; t=1529680010; x=1561216010; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=hYPM1FNcUrZwMpnt4uPkW7tFVmAYhbkUSWPrxK8nh3o=; b=itGUpG3Vw2+i6gOp8cV5ud4d1jha5iOQIqg7RfovvHJiWahweDhJIBI5 3tsMAwZnIZ32XvBbtAs11RoSMMDzxD4RmHinZq2hfwfKa+zhPwQRLgVMr 3yDAO+bSQLsYD2Woezs2uYI6NkydaJBTfnzK8NjNO26uPrD5ekWTL2cb4 elHX31nQ/OVruYjsvYQRYmvUtlInsJEjBitxXfmbxhTaeUPObDjKEzDSQ 0TtGA99uX3iBKabo2xtkA60IHtdPwMUCu80/1ThAz0jC9rw7JTzTsoS3x CV2OS5USyM4rITrOmv50nrbrr/BWdw7IjgBkd9Gcpff9cc/EM0k7wC97N w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,257,1526313600"; d="scan'208";a="184755296" Received: from h199-255-45-14.hgst.com (HELO uls-op-cesaep01.wdc.com) ([199.255.45.14]) by ob1.hgst.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2018 23:06:16 +0800 Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com ([10.248.3.37]) by uls-op-cesaep01.wdc.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2018 07:56:04 -0700 Received: from thinkpad-bart.sdcorp.global.sandisk.com ([10.111.67.248]) by uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2018 08:06:17 -0700 From: Bart Van Assche To: Mike Snitzer Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:06:16 -0700 Message-Id: <20180622150616.5937-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com> X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, Sender IP whitelisted by DNSRBL, ACL 207 matched, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.41]); Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:06:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.41]); Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:06:50 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'68.232.141.245' DOMAIN:'esa1.hgst.iphmx.com' HELO:'esa1.hgst.iphmx.com' FROM:'bart.vanassche@wdc.com' RCPT:'' X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -0.59 (DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID) 68.232.141.245 esa1.hgst.iphmx.com 68.232.141.245 esa1.hgst.iphmx.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.110.41 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.25 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: Bart Van Assche , dm-devel@redhat.com, Mikulas Patocka , Damien Le Moal Subject: [dm-devel] [PATCH] dm-zoned: Avoid triggering reclaim from inside dmz_map() X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.24 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:07:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP This patch avoids that lockdep reports the following: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.18.0-rc1 #62 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/84 is trying to acquire lock: 00000000c313516d (&xfs_nondir_ilock_class){++++}, at: xfs_free_eofblocks+0xa2/0x1e0 but task is already holding lock: 00000000591c83ae (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}: kmem_cache_alloc+0x2c/0x2b0 radix_tree_node_alloc.constprop.19+0x3d/0xc0 __radix_tree_create+0x161/0x1c0 __radix_tree_insert+0x45/0x210 dmz_map+0x245/0x2d0 [dm_zoned] __map_bio+0x40/0x260 __split_and_process_non_flush+0x116/0x220 __split_and_process_bio+0x81/0x180 __dm_make_request.isra.32+0x5a/0x100 generic_make_request+0x36e/0x690 submit_bio+0x6c/0x140 mpage_readpages+0x19e/0x1f0 read_pages+0x6d/0x1b0 __do_page_cache_readahead+0x21b/0x2d0 force_page_cache_readahead+0xc4/0x100 generic_file_read_iter+0x7c6/0xd20 __vfs_read+0x102/0x180 vfs_read+0x9b/0x140 ksys_read+0x55/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #1 (&dmz->chunk_lock){+.+.}: dmz_map+0x133/0x2d0 [dm_zoned] __map_bio+0x40/0x260 __split_and_process_non_flush+0x116/0x220 __split_and_process_bio+0x81/0x180 __dm_make_request.isra.32+0x5a/0x100 generic_make_request+0x36e/0x690 submit_bio+0x6c/0x140 _xfs_buf_ioapply+0x31c/0x590 xfs_buf_submit_wait+0x73/0x520 xfs_buf_read_map+0x134/0x2f0 xfs_trans_read_buf_map+0xc3/0x580 xfs_read_agf+0xa5/0x1e0 xfs_alloc_read_agf+0x59/0x2b0 xfs_alloc_pagf_init+0x27/0x60 xfs_bmap_longest_free_extent+0x43/0xb0 xfs_bmap_btalloc_nullfb+0x7f/0xf0 xfs_bmap_btalloc+0x428/0x7c0 xfs_bmapi_write+0x598/0xcc0 xfs_iomap_write_allocate+0x15a/0x330 xfs_map_blocks+0x1cf/0x3f0 xfs_do_writepage+0x15f/0x7b0 write_cache_pages+0x1ca/0x540 xfs_vm_writepages+0x65/0xa0 do_writepages+0x48/0xf0 __writeback_single_inode+0x58/0x730 writeback_sb_inodes+0x249/0x5c0 wb_writeback+0x11e/0x550 wb_workfn+0xa3/0x670 process_one_work+0x228/0x670 worker_thread+0x3c/0x390 kthread+0x11c/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 -> #0 (&xfs_nondir_ilock_class){++++}: down_read_nested+0x43/0x70 xfs_free_eofblocks+0xa2/0x1e0 xfs_fs_destroy_inode+0xac/0x270 dispose_list+0x51/0x80 prune_icache_sb+0x52/0x70 super_cache_scan+0x127/0x1a0 shrink_slab.part.47+0x1bd/0x590 shrink_node+0x3b5/0x470 balance_pgdat+0x158/0x3b0 kswapd+0x1ba/0x600 kthread+0x11c/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &xfs_nondir_ilock_class --> &dmz->chunk_lock --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&dmz->chunk_lock); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/84: #0: 00000000591c83ae (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: 000000000f8208f5 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}, at: shrink_slab.part.47+0x3f/0x590 #2: 00000000cacefa54 (&type->s_umount_key#43){.+.+}, at: trylock_super+0x16/0x50 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 PID: 84 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 4.18.0-rc1 #62 Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X10SRL-F, BIOS 2.0 12/17/2015 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x85/0xcb print_circular_bug.isra.36+0x1ce/0x1db __lock_acquire+0x124e/0x1310 lock_acquire+0x9f/0x1f0 down_read_nested+0x43/0x70 xfs_free_eofblocks+0xa2/0x1e0 xfs_fs_destroy_inode+0xac/0x270 dispose_list+0x51/0x80 prune_icache_sb+0x52/0x70 super_cache_scan+0x127/0x1a0 shrink_slab.part.47+0x1bd/0x590 shrink_node+0x3b5/0x470 balance_pgdat+0x158/0x3b0 kswapd+0x1ba/0x600 kthread+0x11c/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 Reported-by: Masato Suzuki Fixes: 4218a9554653 ("dm zoned: use GFP_NOIO in I/O path") Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche Cc: Damien Le Moal Cc: Mikulas Patocka --- drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c index 3c0e45f4dcf5..a44183ff4be0 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c @@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ static int dmz_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv) /* Chunk BIO work */ mutex_init(&dmz->chunk_lock); - INIT_RADIX_TREE(&dmz->chunk_rxtree, GFP_KERNEL); + INIT_RADIX_TREE(&dmz->chunk_rxtree, GFP_NOIO); dmz->chunk_wq = alloc_workqueue("dmz_cwq_%s", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_UNBOUND, 0, dev->name); if (!dmz->chunk_wq) {