From patchwork Tue Jul 2 16:48:15 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ard Biesheuvel X-Patchwork-Id: 11028343 X-Patchwork-Delegate: snitzer@redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CFA14F6 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E408B2897A for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:50:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id D848E2897E; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:50:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4330928972 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:50:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3499E356E4; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 101211001B1B; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BE8206D3; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x62GmqBN011552 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 12:48:52 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 27F8C87A3; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:48:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: dm-devel@redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx14.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.43]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2224E422C for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:48:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lj1-f193.google.com (mail-lj1-f193.google.com [209.85.208.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 899A33092664 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 16:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f193.google.com with SMTP id x25so17657003ljh.2 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 09:48:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=PaewssBrh9ZwuFTMe5pwBNB69EEBwT/0ojsMygR82GE=; b=ZuSakWJ/bgPPUz2bvqfYv/H8E2Vs+nwroNU5EIkCegHWji4HmJXyH+OFKGZwFJ5yGJ xPNvVfmYiErkUb4c/f1pBj8slkrW1mNFuk1oUXLawcpIdpEWMoMwuZn7GQegjQVYAZlF 2MUDRWxhjBplraljlxNTu1MxAXCwn0s7nqisNo6MnB2Pu/WTVqijXJeBAcqmQHz8Eytn 53miT0GxDerJm8+MGPr/mRzHDvWULn0aEjIZGhpu+iI1RkYeL2kGFQrlIAyIVQNnj8qB Y4NaSvlTKLFizEr2AYCR3puhn+HjG4OYzp3XCqJdeRbjlTQe3LqOkYdJl3VBUzc9IL7L ZPSA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=PaewssBrh9ZwuFTMe5pwBNB69EEBwT/0ojsMygR82GE=; b=oET7i2EogVaTWRabkS3gMiWLbzAkNtKCzmpZpARSAxkFor/wL/OqN5/l5o+76EOR0F iqXtSY9djLq9EgXwwUx6HL1d6QgvIggMdKEfCTWXxg0wkugandgC6HdnWpICRw/O+RHB S9D9k5QnzN1r1XfIp5pvjySW+HtXIStotTbJTLp4iGqVP7DSGVQvnjzsl/UlwZKWCOAi k+jIS6D1Em1ast/4I1D6qU+OF7q8T9pSLJv2K3rKxIr2KVcVlX6qGt5dRp63ULgE/8+C tuPUwRUbKKB91mdM8k8XYrdipeOq2Ft6n32VPdD3d74XVyfQ5BuRtnFejnHpB4Xzty15 LdsA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWku+L9sLfyUykyynA2PKu4MUwUnSM+T/7R5kcIHcwe5vdyY/gH JDNKkXGMvqTp8bOINtQ1EgESKfzQ16E7MjTK X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz2ujB/W/fKh6VkbxhCOVcIiwLNh2QIwEPtZtMH6b6Tsh6WBfT1XrxAz4hBahb8Erz/OwPT+w== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:4a1a:: with SMTP id x26mr15577667lja.207.1562086118968; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 09:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e111045-lin.arm.com (89-212-78-239.static.t-2.net. [89.212.78.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r17sm3906055ljc.85.2019.07.02.09.48.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 Jul 2019 09:48:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Ard Biesheuvel To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 18:48:15 +0200 Message-Id: <20190702164815.6341-8-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <20190702164815.6341-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> References: <20190702164815.6341-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.43]); Tue, 02 Jul 2019 16:48:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.43]); Tue, 02 Jul 2019 16:48:40 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'209.85.208.193' DOMAIN:'mail-lj1-f193.google.com' HELO:'mail-lj1-f193.google.com' FROM:'ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org' RCPT:'' X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -0.229 (DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_PASS) 209.85.208.193 mail-lj1-f193.google.com 209.85.208.193 mail-lj1-f193.google.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.110.43 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: Herbert Xu , Eric Biggers , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, Gilad Ben-Yossef , dm-devel@redhat.com, Milan Broz Subject: [dm-devel] [PATCH v7 7/7] crypto: arm64/aes - implement accelerated ESSIV/CBC mode X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Tue, 02 Jul 2019 16:50:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Add an accelerated version of the 'essiv(cbc(aes),aes,sha256' skcipher, which is used by fscrypt or dm-crypt on systems where CBC mode is signficantly more performant than XTS mode (e.g., when using a h/w accelerator which supports the former but not the latter) This avoids a separate call into the AES cipher for every invocation. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel --- arch/arm64/crypto/aes-glue.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/crypto/aes-modes.S | 29 ++++- 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-glue.c b/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-glue.c index 11b85ce02d7a..7097739e7cd9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-glue.c +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-glue.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -34,6 +35,8 @@ #define aes_cbc_decrypt ce_aes_cbc_decrypt #define aes_cbc_cts_encrypt ce_aes_cbc_cts_encrypt #define aes_cbc_cts_decrypt ce_aes_cbc_cts_decrypt +#define aes_essiv_cbc_encrypt ce_aes_essiv_cbc_encrypt +#define aes_essiv_cbc_decrypt ce_aes_essiv_cbc_decrypt #define aes_ctr_encrypt ce_aes_ctr_encrypt #define aes_xts_encrypt ce_aes_xts_encrypt #define aes_xts_decrypt ce_aes_xts_decrypt @@ -50,6 +53,8 @@ MODULE_DESCRIPTION("AES-ECB/CBC/CTR/XTS using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions"); #define aes_cbc_decrypt neon_aes_cbc_decrypt #define aes_cbc_cts_encrypt neon_aes_cbc_cts_encrypt #define aes_cbc_cts_decrypt neon_aes_cbc_cts_decrypt +#define aes_essiv_cbc_encrypt neon_aes_essiv_cbc_encrypt +#define aes_essiv_cbc_decrypt neon_aes_essiv_cbc_decrypt #define aes_ctr_encrypt neon_aes_ctr_encrypt #define aes_xts_encrypt neon_aes_xts_encrypt #define aes_xts_decrypt neon_aes_xts_decrypt @@ -93,6 +98,13 @@ asmlinkage void aes_xts_decrypt(u8 out[], u8 const in[], u32 const rk1[], int rounds, int blocks, u32 const rk2[], u8 iv[], int first); +asmlinkage void aes_essiv_cbc_encrypt(u8 out[], u8 const in[], u32 const rk1[], + int rounds, int blocks, u8 iv[], + u32 const rk2[]); +asmlinkage void aes_essiv_cbc_decrypt(u8 out[], u8 const in[], u32 const rk1[], + int rounds, int blocks, u8 iv[], + u32 const rk2[]); + asmlinkage void aes_mac_update(u8 const in[], u32 const rk[], int rounds, int blocks, u8 dg[], int enc_before, int enc_after); @@ -108,6 +120,12 @@ struct crypto_aes_xts_ctx { struct crypto_aes_ctx __aligned(8) key2; }; +struct crypto_aes_essiv_cbc_ctx { + struct crypto_aes_ctx key1; + struct crypto_aes_ctx __aligned(8) key2; + struct crypto_shash *hash; +}; + struct mac_tfm_ctx { struct crypto_aes_ctx key; u8 __aligned(8) consts[]; @@ -145,6 +163,31 @@ static int xts_set_key(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm, const u8 *in_key, return -EINVAL; } +static int essiv_cbc_set_key(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm, const u8 *in_key, + unsigned int key_len) +{ + struct crypto_aes_essiv_cbc_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm); + SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(desc, ctx->hash); + u8 digest[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE]; + int ret; + + ret = aes_expandkey(&ctx->key1, in_key, key_len); + if (ret) + goto out; + + desc->tfm = ctx->hash; + crypto_shash_digest(desc, in_key, key_len, digest); + + ret = aes_expandkey(&ctx->key2, digest, sizeof(digest)); + if (ret) + goto out; + + return 0; +out: + crypto_skcipher_set_flags(tfm, CRYPTO_TFM_RES_BAD_KEY_LEN); + return -EINVAL; +} + static int ecb_encrypt(struct skcipher_request *req) { struct crypto_skcipher *tfm = crypto_skcipher_reqtfm(req); @@ -359,6 +402,68 @@ static int cts_cbc_decrypt(struct skcipher_request *req) return skcipher_walk_done(&walk, 0); } +static int essiv_cbc_init_tfm(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm) +{ + struct crypto_aes_essiv_cbc_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm); + + ctx->hash = crypto_alloc_shash("sha256", 0, 0); + if (IS_ERR(ctx->hash)) + return PTR_ERR(ctx->hash); + + return 0; +} + +static void essiv_cbc_exit_tfm(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm) +{ + struct crypto_aes_essiv_cbc_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm); + + crypto_free_shash(ctx->hash); +} + +static int essiv_cbc_encrypt(struct skcipher_request *req) +{ + struct crypto_skcipher *tfm = crypto_skcipher_reqtfm(req); + struct crypto_aes_essiv_cbc_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm); + int err, rounds = 6 + ctx->key1.key_length / 4; + struct skcipher_walk walk; + unsigned int blocks; + + err = skcipher_walk_virt(&walk, req, false); + + blocks = walk.nbytes / AES_BLOCK_SIZE; + if (blocks) { + kernel_neon_begin(); + aes_essiv_cbc_encrypt(walk.dst.virt.addr, walk.src.virt.addr, + ctx->key1.key_enc, rounds, blocks, + req->iv, ctx->key2.key_enc); + kernel_neon_end(); + err = skcipher_walk_done(&walk, walk.nbytes % AES_BLOCK_SIZE); + } + return err ?: cbc_encrypt_walk(req, &walk); +} + +static int essiv_cbc_decrypt(struct skcipher_request *req) +{ + struct crypto_skcipher *tfm = crypto_skcipher_reqtfm(req); + struct crypto_aes_essiv_cbc_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm); + int err, rounds = 6 + ctx->key1.key_length / 4; + struct skcipher_walk walk; + unsigned int blocks; + + err = skcipher_walk_virt(&walk, req, false); + + blocks = walk.nbytes / AES_BLOCK_SIZE; + if (blocks) { + kernel_neon_begin(); + aes_essiv_cbc_decrypt(walk.dst.virt.addr, walk.src.virt.addr, + ctx->key1.key_dec, rounds, blocks, + req->iv, ctx->key2.key_enc); + kernel_neon_end(); + err = skcipher_walk_done(&walk, walk.nbytes % AES_BLOCK_SIZE); + } + return err ?: cbc_decrypt_walk(req, &walk); +} + static int ctr_encrypt(struct skcipher_request *req) { struct crypto_skcipher *tfm = crypto_skcipher_reqtfm(req); @@ -502,6 +607,24 @@ static struct skcipher_alg aes_algs[] = { { .encrypt = cts_cbc_encrypt, .decrypt = cts_cbc_decrypt, .init = cts_cbc_init_tfm, +}, { + .base = { + .cra_name = "__essiv(cbc(aes),aes,sha256)", + .cra_driver_name = "__essiv-cbc-aes-sha256-" MODE, + .cra_priority = PRIO + 1, + .cra_flags = CRYPTO_ALG_INTERNAL, + .cra_blocksize = AES_BLOCK_SIZE, + .cra_ctxsize = sizeof(struct crypto_aes_essiv_cbc_ctx), + .cra_module = THIS_MODULE, + }, + .min_keysize = AES_MIN_KEY_SIZE, + .max_keysize = AES_MAX_KEY_SIZE, + .ivsize = AES_BLOCK_SIZE, + .setkey = essiv_cbc_set_key, + .encrypt = essiv_cbc_encrypt, + .decrypt = essiv_cbc_decrypt, + .init = essiv_cbc_init_tfm, + .exit = essiv_cbc_exit_tfm, }, { .base = { .cra_name = "__ctr(aes)", diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-modes.S b/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-modes.S index 4c7ce231963c..2ef3d7244ea8 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-modes.S +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-modes.S @@ -91,10 +91,25 @@ AES_ENDPROC(aes_ecb_decrypt) * int blocks, u8 iv[]) * aes_cbc_decrypt(u8 out[], u8 const in[], u8 const rk[], int rounds, * int blocks, u8 iv[]) + * aes_essiv_cbc_encrypt(u8 out[], u8 const in[], u32 const rk1[], + * int rounds, int blocks, u8 iv[], + * u32 const rk2[]); + * aes_essiv_cbc_decrypt(u8 out[], u8 const in[], u32 const rk1[], + * int rounds, int blocks, u8 iv[], + * u32 const rk2[]); */ +AES_ENTRY(aes_essiv_cbc_encrypt) + ld1 {v4.16b}, [x5] /* get iv */ + + mov w8, #14 /* AES-256: 14 rounds */ + enc_prepare w8, x6, x7 + encrypt_block v4, w8, x6, x7, w9 + b .Lessivcbcencstart + AES_ENTRY(aes_cbc_encrypt) ld1 {v4.16b}, [x5] /* get iv */ +.Lessivcbcencstart: enc_prepare w3, x2, x6 .Lcbcencloop4x: @@ -126,13 +141,25 @@ AES_ENTRY(aes_cbc_encrypt) st1 {v4.16b}, [x5] /* return iv */ ret AES_ENDPROC(aes_cbc_encrypt) +AES_ENDPROC(aes_essiv_cbc_encrypt) +AES_ENTRY(aes_essiv_cbc_decrypt) + stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! + mov x29, sp + + ld1 {v7.16b}, [x5] /* get iv */ + + mov w8, #14 /* AES-256: 14 rounds */ + enc_prepare w8, x6, x7 + encrypt_block v7, w8, x6, x7, w9 + b .Lessivcbcdecstart AES_ENTRY(aes_cbc_decrypt) stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! mov x29, sp ld1 {v7.16b}, [x5] /* get iv */ +.Lessivcbcdecstart: dec_prepare w3, x2, x6 .LcbcdecloopNx: @@ -168,6 +195,7 @@ AES_ENTRY(aes_cbc_decrypt) ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16 ret AES_ENDPROC(aes_cbc_decrypt) +AES_ENDPROC(aes_essiv_cbc_decrypt) /* @@ -247,7 +275,6 @@ AES_ENDPROC(aes_cbc_cts_decrypt) .byte 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff .previous - /* * aes_ctr_encrypt(u8 out[], u8 const in[], u8 const rk[], int rounds, * int blocks, u8 ctr[])