| Message ID | 20200828015704.6629-3-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Delegated to: | Mike Snitzer |
| Headers | show |
| Series | IMA: Infrastructure for measurement of critical kernel data | expand |
On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 18:57 -0700, Tushar Sugandhi wrote: > process_buffer_measurement() does not return the result of the operation. > Therefore, the consumers of this function cannot act on it, if needed. > > Update return type of process_buffer_measurement() from void to int. Failure to measure may be audited, but should never fail. This is one of the main differences between secure and trusted boot concepts. Notice in process_measurement() that -EACCES is only returned for appraisal. Returning a failure from process_buffer_measurement() in itself isn't a problem, as long as the failure isn't returned to the LSM/IMA hook. However, just as the callers of process_measurement() originally processed the result, that processing was moved into process_measurement() [1]. Mimi [1] 750943a30714 ima: remove enforce checking duplication > > Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com> > --- > security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 6 +++--- > security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 14 +++++++------- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h > index 8875085db689..83ed57147e68 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h > @@ -265,9 +265,9 @@ void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, > struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value, > int xattr_len, const struct modsig *modsig, int pcr, > struct ima_template_desc *template_desc); > -void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, > - const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func, > - int pcr, const char *func_data); > +int process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, > + const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func, > + int pcr, const char *func_data); > void ima_audit_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, > const unsigned char *filename); > int ima_alloc_init_template(struct ima_event_data *event_data, > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > index c870fd6d2f83..0979a62a9257 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > @@ -736,9 +736,9 @@ int ima_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id) > * > * Based on policy, the buffer is measured into the ima log. > */ > -void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, > - const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func, > - int pcr, const char *func_data) > +int process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, > + const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func, > + int pcr, const char *func_data) > { > int ret = 0; > const char *audit_cause = "ENOMEM"; > @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, > u32 secid; > > if (!ima_policy_flag) > - return; > + return 0; > > /* > * Both LSM hooks and auxilary based buffer measurements are > @@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, > action = ima_get_action(inode, current_cred(), secid, 0, func, > &pcr, &template, func_data); > if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE)) > - return; > + return 0; > } > > if (!pcr) > @@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, > pr_err("template %s init failed, result: %d\n", > (strlen(template->name) ? > template->name : template->fmt), ret); > - return; > + return ret; > } > } > > @@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, > func_measure_str(func), > audit_cause, ret, 0, ret); > > - return; > + return ret; > } > > /** -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
On 2020-08-31 4:36 a.m., Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 18:57 -0700, Tushar Sugandhi wrote: >> process_buffer_measurement() does not return the result of the operation. >> Therefore, the consumers of this function cannot act on it, if needed. >> >> Update return type of process_buffer_measurement() from void to int. > > Failure to measure may be audited, but should never fail. This is one > of the main differences between secure and trusted boot concepts. > Notice in process_measurement() that -EACCES is only returned for > appraisal. > > Returning a failure from process_buffer_measurement() in itself isn't a > problem, as long as the failure isn't returned to the LSM/IMA hook. > However, just as the callers of process_measurement() originally > processed the result, that processing was moved into > process_measurement() [1]. > > Mimi > > [1] 750943a30714 ima: remove enforce checking duplication > I can ignore the result of process_buffer_measurement() in ima_measure_critical_data(), and make ima_measure_critical_data() return type "void". But currently ima_measure_critical_data() is the only place where the results of p_b_m() are being used. So I might as well just revert back the return type of p_b_m() to the original "void". -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index 8875085db689..83ed57147e68 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -265,9 +265,9 @@ void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value, int xattr_len, const struct modsig *modsig, int pcr, struct ima_template_desc *template_desc); -void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, - const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func, - int pcr, const char *func_data); +int process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, + const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func, + int pcr, const char *func_data); void ima_audit_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, const unsigned char *filename); int ima_alloc_init_template(struct ima_event_data *event_data, diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index c870fd6d2f83..0979a62a9257 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -736,9 +736,9 @@ int ima_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id) * * Based on policy, the buffer is measured into the ima log. */ -void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, - const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func, - int pcr, const char *func_data) +int process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, + const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func, + int pcr, const char *func_data) { int ret = 0; const char *audit_cause = "ENOMEM"; @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, u32 secid; if (!ima_policy_flag) - return; + return 0; /* * Both LSM hooks and auxilary based buffer measurements are @@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, action = ima_get_action(inode, current_cred(), secid, 0, func, &pcr, &template, func_data); if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE)) - return; + return 0; } if (!pcr) @@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, pr_err("template %s init failed, result: %d\n", (strlen(template->name) ? template->name : template->fmt), ret); - return; + return ret; } } @@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, func_measure_str(func), audit_cause, ret, 0, ret); - return; + return ret; } /**
process_buffer_measurement() does not return the result of the operation. Therefore, the consumers of this function cannot act on it, if needed. Update return type of process_buffer_measurement() from void to int. Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com> --- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 6 +++--- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 14 +++++++------- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)