From patchwork Sat Feb 20 11:06:29 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jingbo Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 12098107 X-Patchwork-Delegate: snitzer@redhat.com Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54C0C433E0 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 209F064E77 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:51:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 209F064E77 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-563-dbJOTWXIOWuRy1EMYIQP3g-1; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 03:51:43 -0500 X-MC-Unique: dbJOTWXIOWuRy1EMYIQP3g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53C1518449FC; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C4F63CC5; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21F718095CE; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:51:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 11KB6pxT010440 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:06:51 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 8FB8D121156; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 11:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast04.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A75913E790 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 11:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 721041022F09 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 11:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out30-57.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-57.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.57]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-404-a7jetn46OQmywrhwhyzV4Q-1; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:06:47 -0500 X-MC-Unique: a7jetn46OQmywrhwhyzV4Q-1 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R171e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01e04420; MF=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=9; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---0UP1XFxp_1613819201 Received: from localhost(mailfrom:jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UP1XFxp_1613819201) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:06:42 +0800 From: Jeffle Xu To: snitzer@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:06:29 +0800 Message-Id: <20210220110637.50305-5-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> In-Reply-To: <20210220110637.50305-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20210220110637.50305-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Mimecast-Bulk-Signature: yes X-Mimecast-Spam-Signature: bulk X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 03:49:50 -0500 Cc: caspar@linux.alibaba.com, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, ming.lei@redhat.com, hch@lst.de Subject: [dm-devel] [PATCH v4 04/12] block: add poll_capable method to support bio-based IO polling X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com This method can be used to check if bio-based device supports IO polling or not. For mq devices, checking for hw queue in polling mode is adequate, while the sanity check shall be implementation specific for bio-based devices. For example, dm device needs to check if all underlying devices are capable of IO polling. Though bio-based device may have done the sanity check during the device initialization phase, cacheing the result of this sanity check (such as by cacheing in the queue_flags) may not work. Because for dm devices, users could change the state of the underlying devices through '/sys/block//io_poll', bypassing the dm device above. In this case, the cached result of the very beginning sanity check could be out-of-date. Thus the sanity check needs to be done every time 'io_poll' is to be modified. Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu --- block/blk-sysfs.c | 14 +++++++++++--- include/linux/blkdev.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c index b513f1683af0..f11fedefc37d 100644 --- a/block/blk-sysfs.c +++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c @@ -420,9 +420,17 @@ static ssize_t queue_poll_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *page, unsigned long poll_on; ssize_t ret; - if (!q->tag_set || q->tag_set->nr_maps <= HCTX_TYPE_POLL || - !q->tag_set->map[HCTX_TYPE_POLL].nr_queues) - return -EINVAL; + if (queue_is_mq(q)) { + if (!q->tag_set || q->tag_set->nr_maps <= HCTX_TYPE_POLL || + !q->tag_set->map[HCTX_TYPE_POLL].nr_queues) + return -EINVAL; + } else { + struct gendisk *disk = queue_to_disk(q); + + if (!disk->fops->poll_capable || + !disk->fops->poll_capable(disk)) + return -EINVAL; + } ret = queue_var_store(&poll_on, page, count); if (ret < 0) diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h index ebe16f55cba4..8a84088642ce 100644 --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h @@ -1854,6 +1854,7 @@ static inline void blk_ksm_unregister(struct request_queue *q) { } struct block_device_operations { blk_qc_t (*submit_bio) (struct bio *bio); int (*poll)(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie); + bool (*poll_capable)(struct gendisk *disk); int (*open) (struct block_device *, fmode_t); void (*release) (struct gendisk *, fmode_t); int (*rw_page)(struct block_device *, sector_t, struct page *, unsigned int);