From patchwork Fri Jul 30 08:52:37 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Shiyang Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 12411287 X-Patchwork-Delegate: snitzer@redhat.com Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8D6C4320A for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21F3C60EFF for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:54:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 21F3C60EFF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=fujitsu.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-231-_x3AIRauPeiYEECJEtfc3Q-1; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:54:40 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _x3AIRauPeiYEECJEtfc3Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 754951006C80; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E57910074E1; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B046C4A7C8; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 16U8r8tL013531 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 04:53:08 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 7329720FE6D7; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast04.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D98720FE6DE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 937D41066686 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from heian.cn.fujitsu.com (mail.cn.fujitsu.com [183.91.158.132]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-564-rWv1laGxMZeOp7nOueIUtw-1; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 04:52:59 -0400 X-MC-Unique: rWv1laGxMZeOp7nOueIUtw-1 IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:/bXRoatMwuDDEEGi9Nk4VGJ27skDStV00zEX/kB9WHVpm62j5qSTdZEguCMc5wx+ZJheo7q90cW7IE80lqQFhLX5X43SPzUO0VHARO5fBODZsl/d8kPFltJ15ONJdqhSLJnKB0FmsMCS2mKFOudl7N6Z0K3Av4vj80s= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,281,1620662400"; d="scan'208";a="112070559" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2021 16:52:52 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.204]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797D44D0D4A3; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:52:50 +0800 (CST) Received: from G08CNEXJMPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.202) by G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:52:52 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD09.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.85) by G08CNEXJMPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:52:50 +0800 Received: from irides.mr.mr.mr (10.167.225.141) by G08CNEXCHPEKD09.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.23 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:52:48 +0800 From: Shiyang Ruan To: , , , , , Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:52:37 +0800 Message-ID: <20210730085245.3069812-2-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20210730085245.3069812-1-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> References: <20210730085245.3069812-1-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 797D44D0D4A3.A11DE X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:53:42 -0400 Cc: snitzer@redhat.com, david@fromorbit.com, djwong@kernel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@lst.de, agk@redhat.com Subject: [dm-devel] [PATCH v6 1/9] pagemap: Introduce ->memory_failure() X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com When memory-failure occurs, we call this function which is implemented by each kind of devices. For the fsdax case, pmem device driver implements it. Pmem device driver will find out the filesystem in which the corrupted page located in. And finally call filesystem handler to deal with this error. The filesystem will try to recover the corrupted data if necessary. Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan --- include/linux/memremap.h | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/memremap.h b/include/linux/memremap.h index c0e9d35889e8..ed6980087db5 100644 --- a/include/linux/memremap.h +++ b/include/linux/memremap.h @@ -87,6 +87,15 @@ struct dev_pagemap_ops { * the page back to a CPU accessible page. */ vm_fault_t (*migrate_to_ram)(struct vm_fault *vmf); + + /* + * Handle the memory failure happens on a range of pfns. Notify the + * processes who are using these pfns, and try to recover the data on + * them if necessary. The flag is finally passed to the recover + * function through the whole notify routine. + */ + int (*memory_failure)(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, unsigned long pfn, + unsigned long nr_pfns, int flags); }; #define PGMAP_ALTMAP_VALID (1 << 0)