diff mbox series

[07/29] target/iblock: use bdev_nr_sectors instead of open coding it

Message ID 20211013051042.1065752-8-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Delegated to: Mike Snitzer
Headers show
Series [01/29] bcache: remove bdev_sectors | expand

Commit Message

Christoph Hellwig Oct. 13, 2021, 5:10 a.m. UTC
Use the proper helper to read the block device size.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Bodo Stroesser Oct. 13, 2021, 9:31 a.m. UTC | #1
On 13.10.21 07:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Use the proper helper to read the block device size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>   drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c | 5 +++--
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> index 31df20abe141f..ab7f5678ebc44 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> @@ -232,8 +232,9 @@ static unsigned long long iblock_emulate_read_cap_with_block_size(
>   	struct block_device *bd,
>   	struct request_queue *q)
>   {
> -	unsigned long long blocks_long = (div_u64(i_size_read(bd->bd_inode),
> -					bdev_logical_block_size(bd)) - 1);
> +	loff_t size = bdev_nr_sectors(bd) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> +	unsigned long long blocks_long =
> +		div_u64(size, bdev_logical_block_size(bd)) - 1;
>   	u32 block_size = bdev_logical_block_size(bd);

To enhance readability, would it make sense to shift the new lines
behind "u32 block_size = ...", so block_size can be used in div_u64
instead of using bdev_logical_block_size twice?

>   
>   	if (block_size == dev->dev_attrib.block_size)
> 

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
Chaitanya Kulkarni Oct. 13, 2021, 10:37 p.m. UTC | #2
On 10/12/2021 10:10 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Use the proper helper to read the block device size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---

Bodo's comment is good for the code reliability.

Either way, looks good.

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>



--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
index 31df20abe141f..ab7f5678ebc44 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
@@ -232,8 +232,9 @@  static unsigned long long iblock_emulate_read_cap_with_block_size(
 	struct block_device *bd,
 	struct request_queue *q)
 {
-	unsigned long long blocks_long = (div_u64(i_size_read(bd->bd_inode),
-					bdev_logical_block_size(bd)) - 1);
+	loff_t size = bdev_nr_sectors(bd) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
+	unsigned long long blocks_long =
+		div_u64(size, bdev_logical_block_size(bd)) - 1;
 	u32 block_size = bdev_logical_block_size(bd);
 
 	if (block_size == dev->dev_attrib.block_size)