diff mbox series

[1/2] dm integrity: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() for dm-integrity-wait

Message ID 87ddcac4c4e017a42e20dbbfcb8343468a0efc12.1641857023.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [1/2] dm integrity: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() for dm-integrity-wait | expand

Commit Message

Michał Mirosław Jan. 10, 2022, 11:25 p.m. UTC 
Make the requirement for ordering of dm-integrity-wait work
explicit.  No behaviour change because of commit 5c0338c68706
("workqueue: restore WQ_UNBOUND/max_active==1 to be ordered").

Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
---
 drivers/md/dm-integrity.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
index 7af242de3202..6dc9aebf8487 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
@@ -4212,7 +4212,7 @@  static int dm_integrity_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
 	 * If this workqueue were percpu, it would cause bio reordering
 	 * and reduced performance.
 	 */
-	ic->wait_wq = alloc_workqueue("dm-integrity-wait", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_UNBOUND, 1);
+	ic->wait_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("dm-integrity-wait", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
 	if (!ic->wait_wq) {
 		ti->error = "Cannot allocate workqueue";
 		r = -ENOMEM;