diff mbox

dm: make dm_table_alloc_md_mempools static

Message ID alpine.LRH.2.02.1402131343110.22991@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Mike Snitzer
Headers show

Commit Message

Mikulas Patocka Feb. 13, 2014, 6:43 p.m. UTC
Make the function dm_table_alloc_md_mempools static because it is not
called from another module.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>

---
 drivers/md/dm-table.c |    2 +-
 drivers/md/dm.h       |    1 -
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)


--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Comments

Mike Snitzer Feb. 13, 2014, 7:16 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Feb 13 2014 at  1:43pm -0500,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:

> Make the function dm_table_alloc_md_mempools static because it is not
> called from another module.

Doesn't the same apply to dm_table_free_md_mempools?

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
Mikulas Patocka Feb. 13, 2014, 7:19 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Mike Snitzer wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 13 2014 at  1:43pm -0500,
> Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Make the function dm_table_alloc_md_mempools static because it is not
> > called from another module.
> 
> Doesn't the same apply to dm_table_free_md_mempools?

No, it is called from dm.c and defined in dm-table.c

Mikulas

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
Mike Snitzer Feb. 13, 2014, 7:20 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Feb 13 2014 at  2:19pm -0500,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 13 2014 at  1:43pm -0500,
> > Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Make the function dm_table_alloc_md_mempools static because it is not
> > > called from another module.
> > 
> > Doesn't the same apply to dm_table_free_md_mempools?
> 
> No, it is called from dm.c and defined in dm-table.c

Ah, yeah.. I was thinking of exports.. sorry.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
diff mbox

Patch

Index: linux-3.14-rc1/drivers/md/dm-table.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.14-rc1.orig/drivers/md/dm-table.c	2014-02-06 13:37:06.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-3.14-rc1/drivers/md/dm-table.c	2014-02-06 13:37:17.000000000 +0100
@@ -957,7 +957,7 @@  bool dm_table_request_based(struct dm_ta
 	return dm_table_get_type(t) == DM_TYPE_REQUEST_BASED;
 }
 
-int dm_table_alloc_md_mempools(struct dm_table *t)
+static int dm_table_alloc_md_mempools(struct dm_table *t)
 {
 	unsigned type = dm_table_get_type(t);
 	unsigned per_bio_data_size = 0;
Index: linux-3.14-rc1/drivers/md/dm.h
===================================================================
--- linux-3.14-rc1.orig/drivers/md/dm.h	2014-02-06 13:36:53.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-3.14-rc1/drivers/md/dm.h	2014-02-06 13:37:01.000000000 +0100
@@ -73,7 +73,6 @@  unsigned dm_table_get_type(struct dm_tab
 struct target_type *dm_table_get_immutable_target_type(struct dm_table *t);
 bool dm_table_request_based(struct dm_table *t);
 bool dm_table_supports_discards(struct dm_table *t);
-int dm_table_alloc_md_mempools(struct dm_table *t);
 void dm_table_free_md_mempools(struct dm_table *t);
 struct dm_md_mempools *dm_table_get_md_mempools(struct dm_table *t);