diff mbox series

[v2,4/4] brd: implement secure erase and write zeroes

Message ID alpine.LRH.2.02.2209201358580.26535@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series brd: implement discard | expand

Commit Message

Mikulas Patocka Sept. 20, 2022, 5:59 p.m. UTC
This patch implements REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE and REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES on brd.
Write zeroes will free the pages just like discard, but the difference is
that it writes zeroes to the preceding and following page if the range is
not aligned on page boundary. Secure erase is just like write zeroes,
except that it clears the page content before freeing the page.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>

---
 drivers/block/brd.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)


--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Comments

Chaitanya Kulkarni Sept. 21, 2022, 5:03 a.m. UTC | #1
>   /*
> @@ -300,23 +303,34 @@ out:
>   
>   void brd_do_discard(struct brd_device *brd, struct bio *bio)
>   {
> -	sector_t sector, len, front_pad;
> +	bool zero_padding;
> +	sector_t sector, len, front_pad, end_pad;
>   
>   	if (unlikely(!discard)) {
>   		bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_NOTSUPP;
>   		return;
>   	}
>   
> +	zero_padding = bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE || bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES;
>   	sector = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
>   	len = bio_sectors(bio);
>   	front_pad = -sector & (PAGE_SECTORS - 1);
> +
> +	if (zero_padding && unlikely(front_pad != 0))
> +		copy_to_brd(brd, page_address(ZERO_PAGE(0)), sector, min(len, front_pad) << SECTOR_SHIFT);
> +
>   	sector += front_pad;
>   	if (unlikely(len <= front_pad))
>   		return;
>   	len -= front_pad;
> -	len = round_down(len, PAGE_SECTORS);
> +
> +	end_pad = len & (PAGE_SECTORS - 1);
> +	if (zero_padding && unlikely(end_pad != 0))
> +		copy_to_brd(brd, page_address(ZERO_PAGE(0)), sector + len - end_pad, end_pad << SECTOR_SHIFT);
> +	len -= end_pad;
> +
>
Is it possible to avoid these long lines ?

-ck


--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
Pankaj Raghav Sept. 21, 2022, 9:09 a.m. UTC | #2
> @@ -330,7 +344,9 @@ static void brd_submit_bio(struct bio *b
>  	struct bio_vec bvec;
>  	struct bvec_iter iter;
>  
> -	if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) {
> +	if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD ||
> +	    bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE ||
> +	    bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES) {
>  		brd_do_discard(brd, bio);
>  		goto endio;
>  	}
> @@ -464,6 +480,8 @@ static int brd_alloc(int i)
>  	if (discard) {
>  		disk->queue->limits.discard_granularity = PAGE_SIZE;
>  		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(disk->queue, UINT_MAX);
> +		blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(disk->queue, UINT_MAX);
> +		blk_queue_max_secure_erase_sectors(disk->queue, UINT_MAX);
>  	}
>  
The previous patch has the following description for the discard module
param:
MODULE_PARM_DESC(discard, "Support discard");

But you are reusing it here to enable write zeroes and sec erase.
MODULE_PARM_DESC's "desc" parameter also needs to be updated in this patch.

I understand that all these operations kind of do the same thing at the
end, so it is upto you to decide if you want to add individual module param
for each operation or club them together as you have done here. If you
do the latter, then changing the module param variable `discard` to
something more generic would give more clarity as well.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
Christoph Hellwig Sept. 23, 2022, 3:54 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 01:59:46PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> This patch implements REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE and REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES on brd.
> Write zeroes will free the pages just like discard, but the difference is
> that it writes zeroes to the preceding and following page if the range is
> not aligned on page boundary. Secure erase is just like write zeroes,
> except that it clears the page content before freeing the page.

So while I can see the use case for the simple discard you mentioned,
and maybe even the WRITE_ZEROES, I'd rather have a really good
justification for REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE.  It is a bad interface,
and there are alsmost no good reasons for ever using it.  So sprinkling
it in random drivers just we can is not helpful.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
diff mbox series

Patch

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/block/brd.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/block/brd.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/block/brd.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@  static void brd_free_page_rcu(struct rcu
 	__free_page(page);
 }
 
-static void brd_free_page(struct brd_device *brd, sector_t sector)
+static void brd_free_page(struct brd_device *brd, sector_t sector, bool secure)
 {
 	struct page *page;
 	pgoff_t idx;
@@ -124,8 +124,11 @@  static void brd_free_page(struct brd_dev
 	idx = sector >> PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT;
 	page = radix_tree_delete(&brd->brd_pages, idx);
 	spin_unlock(&brd->brd_lock);
-	if (page)
+	if (page) {
+		if (secure)
+			clear_highpage(page);
 		call_rcu(&page->rcu_head, brd_free_page_rcu);
+	}
 }
 
 /*
@@ -300,23 +303,34 @@  out:
 
 void brd_do_discard(struct brd_device *brd, struct bio *bio)
 {
-	sector_t sector, len, front_pad;
+	bool zero_padding;
+	sector_t sector, len, front_pad, end_pad;
 
 	if (unlikely(!discard)) {
 		bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_NOTSUPP;
 		return;
 	}
 
+	zero_padding = bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE || bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES;
 	sector = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
 	len = bio_sectors(bio);
 	front_pad = -sector & (PAGE_SECTORS - 1);
+
+	if (zero_padding && unlikely(front_pad != 0))
+		copy_to_brd(brd, page_address(ZERO_PAGE(0)), sector, min(len, front_pad) << SECTOR_SHIFT);
+
 	sector += front_pad;
 	if (unlikely(len <= front_pad))
 		return;
 	len -= front_pad;
-	len = round_down(len, PAGE_SECTORS);
+
+	end_pad = len & (PAGE_SECTORS - 1);
+	if (zero_padding && unlikely(end_pad != 0))
+		copy_to_brd(brd, page_address(ZERO_PAGE(0)), sector + len - end_pad, end_pad << SECTOR_SHIFT);
+	len -= end_pad;
+
 	while (len) {
-		brd_free_page(brd, sector);
+		brd_free_page(brd, sector, bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE);
 		sector += PAGE_SECTORS;
 		len -= PAGE_SECTORS;
 		cond_resched();
@@ -330,7 +344,9 @@  static void brd_submit_bio(struct bio *b
 	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct bvec_iter iter;
 
-	if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) {
+	if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD ||
+	    bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE ||
+	    bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES) {
 		brd_do_discard(brd, bio);
 		goto endio;
 	}
@@ -464,6 +480,8 @@  static int brd_alloc(int i)
 	if (discard) {
 		disk->queue->limits.discard_granularity = PAGE_SIZE;
 		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(disk->queue, UINT_MAX);
+		blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(disk->queue, UINT_MAX);
+		blk_queue_max_secure_erase_sectors(disk->queue, UINT_MAX);
 	}
 
 	/* Tell the block layer that this is not a rotational device */