mbox series

[resend,00/15] staging: vboxvideo: Convert to atomic modesetting API

Message ID 20180929121825.25765-1-hdegoede@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series staging: vboxvideo: Convert to atomic modesetting API | expand

Message

Hans de Goede Sept. 29, 2018, 12:18 p.m. UTC
Hi All,

This series converts the vboxvideo driver to the modesetting API, once this
is merged I will submit a patch to move the driver out of staging and into
drivers/gpu/drm.

This series consists of 3 parts:

1) More cleanups / prep work for atomic conversion
2) The actual atomic conversion, this is modelled after the atomic conversion
   of the qxl driver done by Gabriel Krisman Bertazi. Gabriel if you are
   reading this, thank you for providing a roadmap how to go about this.
3) Restore some features which were lost by the atomic conversion +
   more cleanups

Regards,

Hans

Comments

Dan Carpenter Oct. 1, 2018, 7:25 a.m. UTC | #1
Why are you resending this?  It's because you added some more patches
on the end?  Just send those as a new series...

regards,
dan carpenter
Hans de Goede Oct. 1, 2018, 9:20 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi,

On 01-10-18 09:25, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Why are you resending this?  It's because you added some more patches
> on the end?  Just send those as a new series...

I accidentally numbered the cover-letter of the original series
01/15 instea dof 00/15 this confused Greg, so he asked for a resend.

Nothing is changed in the resend, otherwise I would have made
the series a v2 and not a resend.

Regards,

Hans
Daniel Vetter Oct. 5, 2018, 4:01 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 11:20:04AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 01-10-18 09:25, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Why are you resending this?  It's because you added some more patches
> > on the end?  Just send those as a new series...
> 
> I accidentally numbered the cover-letter of the original series
> 01/15 instea dof 00/15 this confused Greg, so he asked for a resend.
> 
> Nothing is changed in the resend, otherwise I would have made
> the series a v2 and not a resend.

I'm assuming this all lands for 4.20/5.0, since I've just merged the
series to nuke the transitional helpers for good for 2.21/5.1. Worst case
we just need to pull this in as a topic branch, based on a sufficiently
old-enough kernel.

Cheers, Daniel
Hans de Goede Oct. 6, 2018, 8:12 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi,

On 05-10-18 18:01, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 11:20:04AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 01-10-18 09:25, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> Why are you resending this?  It's because you added some more patches
>>> on the end?  Just send those as a new series...
>>
>> I accidentally numbered the cover-letter of the original series
>> 01/15 instea dof 00/15 this confused Greg, so he asked for a resend.
>>
>> Nothing is changed in the resend, otherwise I would have made
>> the series a v2 and not a resend.
> 
> I'm assuming this all lands for 4.20/5.0,

Yes Greg has the entire series queued up in staging-next.

Regards,

Hans