Message ID | 20210129095604.32423-1-tzimmermann@suse.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | drm/gma500: Remove Moorestown/Medfield | expand |
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:56 AM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> wrote: > > Support for Moorestown and Medfield platforms is being removed from > the kernel. So here's a patch to remove the related code from the > gma500 driver. On top of that I also cleaned up the configuration > a bit. > > Note that Poulsbo and Cedartrail is still there and will remain. With > the MID platforms gone, there's actually a chance of cleaning up the > code for the desktop chips. > > I smoke tested the patchset by running Xorg and Weston on a Cedartrail > system. Hi Thomas, It is correct that Moorestown platform support is removed in the kernel but Oaktrail and Moorestown aren't interchangeable. They share the same CPU/GPU but not platform. I still have an Oaktrail device (Minnowboard v1) which needs to be supported. Medfield on the other hand can go as far as I'm concerned. I'll have a closer look at the patches this afternoon. Thanks Patrik
Hi Am 29.01.21 um 11:46 schrieb Patrik Jakobsson: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:56 AM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> wrote: >> >> Support for Moorestown and Medfield platforms is being removed from >> the kernel. So here's a patch to remove the related code from the >> gma500 driver. On top of that I also cleaned up the configuration >> a bit. >> >> Note that Poulsbo and Cedartrail is still there and will remain. With >> the MID platforms gone, there's actually a chance of cleaning up the >> code for the desktop chips. >> >> I smoke tested the patchset by running Xorg and Weston on a Cedartrail >> system. > > Hi Thomas, > It is correct that Moorestown platform support is removed in the > kernel but Oaktrail and Moorestown aren't interchangeable. They share > the same CPU/GPU but not platform. I still have an Oaktrail device > (Minnowboard v1) which needs to be supported. Medfield on the other > hand can go as far as I'm concerned. I see. So patch 2 would have to be removed. Best regards Thomas > > I'll have a closer look at the patches this afternoon. > > Thanks > Patrik >