Message ID | 20220420235228.2767816-1-tjmercier@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Proposal for a GPU cgroup controller | expand |
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 11:52:18PM +0000, T.J. Mercier wrote: > This patch series revisits the proposal for a GPU cgroup controller to > track and limit memory allocations by various device/allocator > subsystems. The patch series also contains a simple prototype to > illustrate how Android intends to implement DMA-BUF allocator > attribution using the GPU cgroup controller. The prototype does not > include resource limit enforcements. > > Changelog: > v5: > Rebase on top of v5.18-rc3 Why is a "RFC" series on v5? I treat "RFC" as "not ready to be merged, if people are interested, please look at it". But v5 seems like you think this is real. confused, greg k-h
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 7:53 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 11:52:18PM +0000, T.J. Mercier wrote: > > This patch series revisits the proposal for a GPU cgroup controller to > > track and limit memory allocations by various device/allocator > > subsystems. The patch series also contains a simple prototype to > > illustrate how Android intends to implement DMA-BUF allocator > > attribution using the GPU cgroup controller. The prototype does not > > include resource limit enforcements. > > > > Changelog: > > v5: > > Rebase on top of v5.18-rc3 > > Why is a "RFC" series on v5? I treat "RFC" as "not ready to be merged, > if people are interested, please look at it". But v5 seems like you > think this is real. > > confused, > > greg k-h I'm sorry for the confusion. I'll change this to PATCH in future revisions.