Message ID | 20241001-patchv3_1-v3-0-d23284f45977@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Display enablement changes for Qualcomm SA8775P platform | expand |
On 01/10/2024 08:41, Mahadevan via B4 Relay wrote: > This series introduces support to enable the Mobile Display Subsystem (MDSS) > and Display Processing Unit (DPU) for the Qualcomm SA8775P target. It > includes the addition of the hardware catalog, compatible string, > relevant device tree changes, and their YAML bindings. > > --- > In this series PATCH 5: "arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: add display dt nodes for MDSS0 and DPU" > depends on the clock enablement change: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-sa8775p-mm-v3-v1-0-77d53c3c0cef@quicinc.com/ > b4 diff fails. b4 mbox + b4 diff -m also fail. Way to make reviewers life more difficult than it should be. I'll move this patchset to the bottom of the queue. Please in the future send patches in standard way, so our tools can handle it easily. Best regards, Krzysztof
On October 1, 2024 1:16:31 PM GMT+03:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: >On 01/10/2024 08:41, Mahadevan via B4 Relay wrote: >> This series introduces support to enable the Mobile Display Subsystem (MDSS) >> and Display Processing Unit (DPU) for the Qualcomm SA8775P target. It >> includes the addition of the hardware catalog, compatible string, >> relevant device tree changes, and their YAML bindings. >> >> --- >> In this series PATCH 5: "arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: add display dt nodes for MDSS0 and DPU" >> depends on the clock enablement change: >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-sa8775p-mm-v3-v1-0-77d53c3c0cef@quicinc.com/ >> > >b4 diff fails. b4 mbox + b4 diff -m also fail. Way to make reviewers >life more difficult than it should be. > >I'll move this patchset to the bottom of the queue. Please in the future >send patches in standard way, so our tools can handle it easily. This is the first time I read that using b4 tool is a strong requirement. This iteration has been sent using b4, previous, probably, were not. > >Best regards, >Krzysztof >