Message ID | 1350910286-8073-2-git-send-email-thellstrom@vmware.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index 402ab69..d42631c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c @@ -817,11 +817,11 @@ retry: goto retry; } - ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, false, no_wait_reserve, false, 0); + ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, false, true, false, 0); if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY)) { spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock); - if (likely(!no_wait_gpu)) + if (likely(!no_wait_reserve)) ret = ttm_bo_wait_unreserved(bo, interruptible); kref_put(&bo->list_kref, ttm_bo_release_list);
The ttm_mem_evict_first function could theoretically drop the lru lock without retrying if a reservation from off the LRU list ended up waiting. However, since currently there are no users that could cause a wait in that situation so this is not suitable for stable Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)