From patchwork Wed Apr 24 15:52:39 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?b?VmlsbGUgU3lyasOkbMOk?= X-Patchwork-Id: 2485301 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-dri-devel@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork1.kernel.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) by patchwork1.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FCA3FD85 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DF7E62C8 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:00:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C313E5F81; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2013 08:51:42 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,542,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="323917219" Received: from stinkbox.fi.intel.com (HELO stinkbox) ([10.237.72.168]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2013 08:53:10 -0700 Received: by stinkbox (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:53:08 +0300 From: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915: Relax the sprite scaling limits checks Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:52:39 +0300 Message-Id: <1366818759-8707-7-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.5 In-Reply-To: <1366818759-8707-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> References: <1366818759-8707-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces+patchwork-dri-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+patchwork-dri-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.freedesktop.org From: Ville Syrjälä Reduce the size of the the src/dst viewport to keep the scalign ratios in check. v2: Below min size sprite handling squashed to previous patch Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c index 044cc263..27cb14a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c @@ -681,26 +681,19 @@ intel_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc, return -EINVAL; } + /* + * FIXME the following code does a bunch of fuzzy adjustments to the + * coordinates and sizes. We probably need some way to decide whether + * more strict checking should be done instead. + */ max_scale = intel_plane->max_downscale << 16; min_scale = intel_plane->can_scale ? 1 : (1 << 16); - hscale = drm_rect_calc_hscale(&src, &dst, min_scale, max_scale); - if (hscale < 0) { - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Horizontal scaling factor out of limits\n"); - drm_rect_debug_print(&src, true); - drm_rect_debug_print(&dst, false); + hscale = drm_rect_calc_hscale_relaxed(&src, &dst, min_scale, max_scale); + BUG_ON(hscale < 0); - return hscale; - } - - vscale = drm_rect_calc_vscale(&src, &dst, min_scale, max_scale); - if (vscale < 0) { - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Vertical scaling factor out of limits\n"); - drm_rect_debug_print(&src, true); - drm_rect_debug_print(&dst, false); - - return vscale; - } + vscale = drm_rect_calc_vscale_relaxed(&src, &dst, min_scale, max_scale); + BUG_ON(vscale < 0); visible = drm_rect_clip_scaled(&src, &dst, &clip, hscale, vscale); @@ -710,6 +703,25 @@ intel_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc, crtc_h = drm_rect_height(&dst); if (visible) { + /* check again in case clipping clamped the results */ + hscale = drm_rect_calc_hscale(&src, &dst, min_scale, max_scale); + if (hscale < 0) { + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Horizontal scaling factor out of limits\n"); + drm_rect_debug_print(&src, true); + drm_rect_debug_print(&dst, false); + + return hscale; + } + + vscale = drm_rect_calc_vscale(&src, &dst, min_scale, max_scale); + if (vscale < 0) { + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Vertical scaling factor out of limits\n"); + drm_rect_debug_print(&src, true); + drm_rect_debug_print(&dst, false); + + return vscale; + } + /* Make the source viewport size an exact multiple of the scaling factors. */ drm_rect_adjust_size(&src, drm_rect_width(&dst) * hscale - drm_rect_width(&src), @@ -726,10 +738,6 @@ intel_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc, * Adjust to (macro)pixel boundary, but be careful not to * increase the source viewport size, because that could * push the downscaling factor out of bounds. - * - * FIXME Should we be really strict and reject the - * config if it results in non (macro)pixel aligned - * coords? */ src_x = src.x1 >> 16; src_w = drm_rect_width(&src) >> 16;