diff mbox

drm/panel: ld9040: Update calls to gpiod_get*()

Message ID 1414052177-19978-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

Alexandre Courbot Oct. 23, 2014, 8:16 a.m. UTC
Add the new flags argument to calls of (devm_)gpiod_get*() and
remove any direction setting code afterwards.

Currently both forms (with or without the flags argument)
are valid thanks to transitional macros in
<linux/gpio/consumer.h>. These macros will be removed once
all consumers are updated and the flags argument will become
compulsary.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ld9040.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrzej Hajda Oct. 23, 2014, 9:45 a.m. UTC | #1
On 10/23/2014 10:16 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Add the new flags argument to calls of (devm_)gpiod_get*() and
> remove any direction setting code afterwards.
> 
> Currently both forms (with or without the flags argument)
> are valid thanks to transitional macros in
> <linux/gpio/consumer.h>. These macros will be removed once
> all consumers are updated and the flags argument will become
> compulsary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>

It needs patch "gpio: Fix gpio direction flags not getting set" to work
correctly. It is not yet present in drm-next. Beside this:

Acked-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>

--
Regards
Andrzej

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ld9040.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ld9040.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ld9040.c
> index 42ac67b21e9f..dd1d3f2e624e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ld9040.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ld9040.c
> @@ -336,17 +336,12 @@ static int ld9040_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ctx->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset");
> +	ctx->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
>  	if (IS_ERR(ctx->reset_gpio)) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "cannot get reset-gpios %ld\n",
>  			PTR_ERR(ctx->reset_gpio));
>  		return PTR_ERR(ctx->reset_gpio);
>  	}
> -	ret = gpiod_direction_output(ctx->reset_gpio, 1);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "cannot configure reset-gpios %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> -	}
>  
>  	spi->bits_per_word = 9;
>  	ret = spi_setup(spi);
>
Alexandre Courbot Nov. 6, 2014, 3:32 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 10:16 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> Add the new flags argument to calls of (devm_)gpiod_get*() and
>> remove any direction setting code afterwards.
>>
>> Currently both forms (with or without the flags argument)
>> are valid thanks to transitional macros in
>> <linux/gpio/consumer.h>. These macros will be removed once
>> all consumers are updated and the flags argument will become
>> compulsary.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
>
> It needs patch "gpio: Fix gpio direction flags not getting set" to work
> correctly. It is not yet present in drm-next. Beside this:
>
> Acked-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>

The required patch is now merged, can we go on with this patch?
Andrzej Hajda Nov. 6, 2014, 7:26 a.m. UTC | #3
On 11/06/2014 04:32 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> wrote:
>> On 10/23/2014 10:16 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>> Add the new flags argument to calls of (devm_)gpiod_get*() and
>>> remove any direction setting code afterwards.
>>>
>>> Currently both forms (with or without the flags argument)
>>> are valid thanks to transitional macros in
>>> <linux/gpio/consumer.h>. These macros will be removed once
>>> all consumers are updated and the flags argument will become
>>> compulsary.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
>> It needs patch "gpio: Fix gpio direction flags not getting set" to work
>> correctly. It is not yet present in drm-next. Beside this:
>>
>> Acked-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
> The required patch is now merged, can we go on with this patch?
>
Yes, for both panels. Thanks.

Regards
Andrzej
Thierry Reding Nov. 6, 2014, 8:51 a.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:16:17PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Add the new flags argument to calls of (devm_)gpiod_get*() and
> remove any direction setting code afterwards.
> 
> Currently both forms (with or without the flags argument)
> are valid thanks to transitional macros in
> <linux/gpio/consumer.h>. These macros will be removed once
> all consumers are updated and the flags argument will become
> compulsary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ld9040.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

Thierry
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ld9040.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ld9040.c
index 42ac67b21e9f..dd1d3f2e624e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ld9040.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ld9040.c
@@ -336,17 +336,12 @@  static int ld9040_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	ctx->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset");
+	ctx->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
 	if (IS_ERR(ctx->reset_gpio)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "cannot get reset-gpios %ld\n",
 			PTR_ERR(ctx->reset_gpio));
 		return PTR_ERR(ctx->reset_gpio);
 	}
-	ret = gpiod_direction_output(ctx->reset_gpio, 1);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(dev, "cannot configure reset-gpios %d\n", ret);
-		return ret;
-	}
 
 	spi->bits_per_word = 9;
 	ret = spi_setup(spi);