| Message ID | 1435745365-21045-1-git-send-email-human.hwang@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c index 8040ed2..f1c6b76 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c @@ -593,8 +593,7 @@ static int gsc_src_set_transf(struct device *dev, gsc_write(cfg, GSC_IN_CON); - ctx->rotation = cfg & - (GSC_IN_ROT_90 | GSC_IN_ROT_270) ? 1 : 0; + ctx->rotation = (cfg & GSC_IN_ROT_90) ? 1 : 0; *swap = ctx->rotation; return 0; @@ -857,8 +856,7 @@ static int gsc_dst_set_transf(struct device *dev, gsc_write(cfg, GSC_IN_CON); - ctx->rotation = cfg & - (GSC_IN_ROT_90 | GSC_IN_ROT_270) ? 1 : 0; + ctx->rotation = (cfg & GSC_IN_ROT_90) ? 1 : 0; *swap = ctx->rotation; return 0;
The bits for rotation are not used as exclusively. So GSC_IN_ROT_270 can not be used for swap detection. The definition of it is same with GSC_IN_ROT_MASK. It is enough to check GSC_IN_ROT_90 bit is set or not to check whether width / height size swapping is needed. Signed-off-by: Hyungwon Hwang <human.hwang@samsung.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gsc.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)