From patchwork Fri Jan 29 15:09:31 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Javier Martinez Canillas X-Patchwork-Id: 8164201 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-dri-devel@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork1.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork1.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1839F38B for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABBA2039D for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CCB2038F for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9C26E094; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:09:46 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Delivered-To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from lists.s-osg.org (lists.s-osg.org [54.187.51.154]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D736E094 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:09:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from sauron.sisa.samsung.com (unknown [162.246.216.28]) by lists.s-osg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6CE0462CE; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:09:39 -0800 (PST) From: Javier Martinez Canillas To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] drm/exynos: dp: Fix panel and bridge lookup logic Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:09:31 -0300 Message-Id: <1454080171-23769-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.5.0 Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Jingoo Han , Seung-Woo Kim , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Javier Martinez Canillas , Kyungmin Park , Kukjin Kim , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Commit a9fa852886fd ("drm/exynos: dp: add of_graph dt binding support for panel") made the Exynos DP DT binding more consistent since the OF graph could be used to lookup either a panel or a bridge device node. Before that commit, a panel would be looked up using a phandle and a bridge using the OF graph which made the DT binding not consistent. But the patch broke the later case since not finding a panel dev node would cause the driver's to do a probe deferral instead of attempting to lookup a bridge device node associated with the remote endpoint. So instead of returning a -EPROBE_DEFER if a panel is not found, check if there's a bridge and only do a probe deferral if both aren't found. Fixes: a9fa852886fd ("drm/exynos: dp: add of_graph dt binding support for panel") Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas --- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 55 +++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c index b79c316c2ad2..673164b331c8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c @@ -1392,7 +1392,7 @@ static const struct component_ops exynos_dp_ops = { static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; - struct device_node *panel_node = NULL, *bridge_node, *endpoint = NULL; + struct device_node *np = NULL, *endpoint = NULL; struct exynos_dp_device *dp; int ret; @@ -1404,41 +1404,36 @@ static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dp); /* This is for the backward compatibility. */ - panel_node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "panel", 0); - if (panel_node) { - dp->panel = of_drm_find_panel(panel_node); - of_node_put(panel_node); + np = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "panel", 0); + if (np) { + dp->panel = of_drm_find_panel(np); + of_node_put(np); if (!dp->panel) return -EPROBE_DEFER; - } else { - endpoint = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(dev->of_node, NULL); - if (endpoint) { - panel_node = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(endpoint); - if (panel_node) { - dp->panel = of_drm_find_panel(panel_node); - of_node_put(panel_node); - if (!dp->panel) - return -EPROBE_DEFER; - } else { - DRM_ERROR("no port node for panel device.\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - } - } - - if (endpoint) goto out; + } endpoint = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(dev->of_node, NULL); if (endpoint) { - bridge_node = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(endpoint); - if (bridge_node) { - dp->ptn_bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(bridge_node); - of_node_put(bridge_node); - if (!dp->ptn_bridge) - return -EPROBE_DEFER; - } else - return -EPROBE_DEFER; + np = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(endpoint); + if (np) { + /* The remote port can be either a panel or a bridge */ + dp->panel = of_drm_find_panel(np); + if (!dp->panel) { + dp->ptn_bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(np); + if (!dp->ptn_bridge) { + of_node_put(np); + return -EPROBE_DEFER; + } + } + of_node_put(np); + } else { + DRM_ERROR("no remote endpoint device node found.\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + } else { + DRM_ERROR("no port endpoint subnode found.\n"); + return -EINVAL; } out: