diff mbox

[v6,2/2] drm: Prevent release fb after cleanup mode config

Message ID 1491818445-11409-3-git-send-email-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Jeffy Chen April 10, 2017, 10 a.m. UTC
After unbinding drm, the user space may still owns the drm dev fd,
and may trigger fb release after cleanup mode config.

Add a sanity check to prevent that.

Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
---

Changes in v6: None
Changes in v5: None
Changes in v2: None

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Comments

Jeffy Chen April 11, 2017, 3:04 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Sean,

On 04/11/2017 04:31 AM, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 06:00:45PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
>> After unbinding drm, the user space may still owns the drm dev fd,
>> and may trigger fb release after cleanup mode config.
>>
>> Add a sanity check to prevent that.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v6: None
>> Changes in v5: None
>> Changes in v2: None
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c | 5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
>> index e8f9c13..03c1632 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
>> @@ -583,6 +583,11 @@ void drm_fb_release(struct drm_file *priv)
>>   {
>>   	struct drm_framebuffer *fb, *tfb;
>>   	struct drm_mode_rmfb_work arg;
>> +	struct drm_minor *minor = priv->minor;
>> +	struct drm_device *dev = minor->dev;
>> +
>> +	if (WARN_ON(!dev->mode_config.num_fb && !list_empty(&priv->fbs)))
>
> Have you actually seen this happen? num_fb should be tightly couple to
> priv->fbs, so it seems like this could only result from a driver bug (or I'm not
> reading the code correctly).
yes, 100% repro by:
1/ start display server
2/ unbind drm
3/ stop display server

the num_fb would be decreased(with a warning in 
drm_mode_config_cleanup's fb_list check) in 
drm_mode_config_cleanup->drm_framebuffer_free->rockchip_drm_fb_destroy->drm_framebuffer_cleanup

this flow would not modify the priv->fbs at the same time. so it would 
still remains the pointer of those freed fb.

>
> Sean
>
>> +		return;
>>
>>   	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&arg.fbs);
>>
>> --
>> 2.1.4
>>
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
index e8f9c13..03c1632 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
@@ -583,6 +583,11 @@  void drm_fb_release(struct drm_file *priv)
 {
 	struct drm_framebuffer *fb, *tfb;
 	struct drm_mode_rmfb_work arg;
+	struct drm_minor *minor = priv->minor;
+	struct drm_device *dev = minor->dev;
+
+	if (WARN_ON(!dev->mode_config.num_fb && !list_empty(&priv->fbs)))
+		return;
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&arg.fbs);