diff mbox

[PATCHv2] drm: omapdrm: Register omapdrm platform device in omapdss driver

Message ID 1502876941-7486-1-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Tomi Valkeinen Aug. 16, 2017, 9:49 a.m. UTC
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

The omapdrm platform device is a virtual device created for the sole
purpose of handling the omapdss/omapdrm driver split. It should
eventually be removed. As a first step to ease refactoring move its
registration from platform code to driver code.

The omapdrm driver name must be changed internally to avoid probing both
the device registered in platform code and the device registered in the
omapdss driver, as that would otherwise break bisection.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
---

I reworked this patch to create the platform device dynamically.

 drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/core.c | 10 ++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c |  8 +++++++-
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Laurent Pinchart Aug. 16, 2017, 12:31 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Tomi,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wednesday 16 Aug 2017 12:49:01 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> 
> The omapdrm platform device is a virtual device created for the sole
> purpose of handling the omapdss/omapdrm driver split. It should
> eventually be removed. As a first step to ease refactoring move its
> registration from platform code to driver code.
> 
> The omapdrm driver name must be changed internally to avoid probing both
> the device registered in platform code and the device registered in the
> omapdss driver, as that would otherwise break bisection.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>

This looks good to me, so

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

I trust that you have tested the patch with module unloading given that was 
how you found the original issue :-)

> ---
> 
> I reworked this patch to create the platform device dynamically.
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/core.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c |  8 +++++++-
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/core.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/core.c index 4dabe32c7098..6b3247c4f857
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/core.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,8 @@ static void (*dss_output_drv_unreg_funcs[])(void) = {
>  	dss_uninit_platform_driver,
>  };
> 
> +static struct platform_device *omap_drm_device;
> +
>  static int __init omap_dss_init(void)
>  {
>  	int r;
> @@ -118,6 +120,12 @@ static int __init omap_dss_init(void)
>  			goto err_reg;
>  	}
> 
> +	omap_drm_device = platform_device_register_simple("omapdrm_", 0, NULL, 
0);
> +	if (IS_ERR(omap_drm_device)) {
> +		r = PTR_ERR(omap_drm_device);
> +		goto err_reg;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
> 
>  err_reg:
> @@ -135,6 +143,8 @@ static void __exit omap_dss_exit(void)
>  {
>  	int i;
> 
> +	platform_device_unregister(omap_drm_device);
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dss_output_drv_unreg_funcs); ++i)
>  		dss_output_drv_unreg_funcs[i]();
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c index 10e24ca928f2..2b990daf0052
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
> @@ -575,6 +575,12 @@ static int pdev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (omapdss_is_initialized() == false)
>  		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> 
> +	ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to set the DMA mask\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	omap_crtc_pre_init();
> 
>  	ret = omap_connect_dssdevs();
> @@ -762,7 +768,7 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(omapdrm_pm_ops,
> omap_drm_suspend, omap_drm_resume);
> 
>  static struct platform_driver pdev = {
>  	.driver = {
> -		.name = DRIVER_NAME,
> +		.name = "omapdrm_",
>  		.pm = &omapdrm_pm_ops,
>  	},
>  	.probe = pdev_probe,
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/core.c
index 4dabe32c7098..6b3247c4f857 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/core.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/core.c
@@ -103,6 +103,8 @@  static void (*dss_output_drv_unreg_funcs[])(void) = {
 	dss_uninit_platform_driver,
 };
 
+static struct platform_device *omap_drm_device;
+
 static int __init omap_dss_init(void)
 {
 	int r;
@@ -118,6 +120,12 @@  static int __init omap_dss_init(void)
 			goto err_reg;
 	}
 
+	omap_drm_device = platform_device_register_simple("omapdrm_", 0, NULL, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(omap_drm_device)) {
+		r = PTR_ERR(omap_drm_device);
+		goto err_reg;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 
 err_reg:
@@ -135,6 +143,8 @@  static void __exit omap_dss_exit(void)
 {
 	int i;
 
+	platform_device_unregister(omap_drm_device);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dss_output_drv_unreg_funcs); ++i)
 		dss_output_drv_unreg_funcs[i]();
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
index 10e24ca928f2..2b990daf0052 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
@@ -575,6 +575,12 @@  static int pdev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (omapdss_is_initialized() == false)
 		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
 
+	ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to set the DMA mask\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
 	omap_crtc_pre_init();
 
 	ret = omap_connect_dssdevs();
@@ -762,7 +768,7 @@  static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(omapdrm_pm_ops, omap_drm_suspend, omap_drm_resume);
 
 static struct platform_driver pdev = {
 	.driver = {
-		.name = DRIVER_NAME,
+		.name = "omapdrm_",
 		.pm = &omapdrm_pm_ops,
 	},
 	.probe = pdev_probe,