diff mbox series

[rdma-core,5/5] tests: Bug fix for get_access_flags()

Message ID 1606153984-104583-6-git-send-email-jianxin.xiong@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Add user space dma-buf support | expand

Commit Message

Xiong, Jianxin Nov. 23, 2020, 5:53 p.m. UTC
The filter defintion is wrong and causes get_access_flags() always
returning empty list. As the result the MR tests using this function
are effectively skipped (but report success).

Also fix a typo in the comments.

Signed-off-by: Jianxin Xiong <jianxin.xiong@intel.com>
---
 tests/utils.py | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

John Hubbard Nov. 24, 2020, 8:26 p.m. UTC | #1
Just some silly nits I stumbled across while trying to understand the tests.

On 11/23/20 9:53 AM, Jianxin Xiong wrote:
> The filter defintion is wrong and causes get_access_flags() always

              definition

> returning empty list. As the result the MR tests using this function
> are effectively skipped (but report success).
> 
> Also fix a typo in the comments.

Was there another typo somewhere? All I see is an *added* typo...

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianxin Xiong <jianxin.xiong@intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/utils.py | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/utils.py b/tests/utils.py
> index 0ad7110..eee44b4 100644
> --- a/tests/utils.py
> +++ b/tests/utils.py
> @@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ def filter_illegal_access_flags(element):
>       :param element: A list of access flags to check
>       :return: True if this list is legal, else False
>       """
> -    if e.IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC in element or e.IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE:
> -        if e.IBV_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE:
> +    if e.IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC in element or e.IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE in element:
> +        if not e.IBV_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE in element:
>               return False
>       return True
>   
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ def get_access_flags(ctx):
>       added as well.
>       After verifying that the flags selection is legal, it is appended to an
>       array, assuming it wasn't previously appended.
> -    :param ctx: Device Context to check capabilities
> +    :param ctx: Device Coyyntext to check capabilities

I liked the old spelling. "Coyyntext" just doesn't sound as good. :)

>       :param num: Size of initial collection
>       :return: A random legal value for MR flags
>       """
> 

thanks,
Xiong, Jianxin Nov. 24, 2020, 8:43 p.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 12:27 PM
> To: Xiong, Jianxin <jianxin.xiong@intel.com>; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>; Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>; Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>; Sumit Semwal
> <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>; Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>; Vetter, Daniel <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-core 5/5] tests: Bug fix for get_access_flags()
> 
> Just some silly nits I stumbled across while trying to understand the tests.
> 
> On 11/23/20 9:53 AM, Jianxin Xiong wrote:
> > The filter defintion is wrong and causes get_access_flags() always
> 
>               definition

Thanks.

> 
> > returning empty list. As the result the MR tests using this function
> > are effectively skipped (but report success).
> >
> > Also fix a typo in the comments.
> 
> Was there another typo somewhere? All I see is an *added* typo...
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianxin Xiong <jianxin.xiong@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   tests/utils.py | 6 +++---
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/utils.py b/tests/utils.py index 0ad7110..eee44b4
> > 100644
> > --- a/tests/utils.py
> > +++ b/tests/utils.py
> > @@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ def filter_illegal_access_flags(element):
> >       :param element: A list of access flags to check
> >       :return: True if this list is legal, else False
> >       """
> > -    if e.IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC in element or e.IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE:
> > -        if e.IBV_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE:
> > +    if e.IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC in element or e.IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE in element:
> > +        if not e.IBV_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE in element:
> >               return False
> >       return True
> >
> > @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ def get_access_flags(ctx):
> >       added as well.
> >       After verifying that the flags selection is legal, it is appended to an
> >       array, assuming it wasn't previously appended.
> > -    :param ctx: Device Context to check capabilities
> > +    :param ctx: Device Coyyntext to check capabilities
> 
> I liked the old spelling. "Coyyntext" just doesn't sound as good. :)

Hmm, I don't know what happened 
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tests/utils.py b/tests/utils.py
index 0ad7110..eee44b4 100644
--- a/tests/utils.py
+++ b/tests/utils.py
@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@  def filter_illegal_access_flags(element):
     :param element: A list of access flags to check
     :return: True if this list is legal, else False
     """
-    if e.IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC in element or e.IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE:
-        if e.IBV_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE:
+    if e.IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC in element or e.IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE in element:
+        if not e.IBV_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE in element:
             return False
     return True
 
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@  def get_access_flags(ctx):
     added as well.
     After verifying that the flags selection is legal, it is appended to an
     array, assuming it wasn't previously appended.
-    :param ctx: Device Context to check capabilities
+    :param ctx: Device Coyyntext to check capabilities
     :param num: Size of initial collection
     :return: A random legal value for MR flags
     """