Message ID | 20180503164009.14395-4-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 06:40:06PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > DT nodes might be present in the DT but with a status property set to > "disabled" or "fail". In this case, we should not return -EPROBE_DEFER > when the caller ask for a drm_panel instance. Return -ENODEV instead. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c index 2d9e2684c6c8..15df28d20194 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c @@ -136,13 +136,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_panel_detach); * * Return: A pointer to the panel registered for the specified device tree * node or an ERR_PTR() if no panel matching the device tree node can be found. - * The only error that can be reported is -EPROBE_DEFER, meaning that the panel - * device has not been probed yet, and the caller should re-retry later. + * Possible error codes returned by this function: + * - EPROBE_DEFER: the panel device has not been probed yet, and the caller + * should re-retry later + * - ENODEV: the device is not available (status != "okay" or "ok") */ struct drm_panel *of_drm_find_panel(const struct device_node *np) { struct drm_panel *panel; + if (!of_device_is_available(np)) + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); + mutex_lock(&panel_lock); list_for_each_entry(panel, &panel_list, list) {
DT nodes might be present in the DT but with a status property set to "disabled" or "fail". In this case, we should not return -EPROBE_DEFER when the caller ask for a drm_panel instance. Return -ENODEV instead. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)